Dahie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> They are not, they are in perspective, however
> roughly the same, so they can be compared. Still,
> one doesn't fit this comparison, which is
> Williams.
Let's put it another way. With a wide-angle lens (which this looks to be - somewhere between 12mm and 17mm) the middle of the car would be exaggerated. Unless all the cars were taken at exactly the same distance and angle and with the same focal length, then no comparison can be drawn. They're all different, but look at the Renault to show just how exaggerated the difference can be.
You can compare basic shape and style, but wheelbase is out - especially so with the detail on wheelbase they've attempted on the (again, exaggerated example) Williams (which as already out anyway as Dahie has said).