J i m Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Another thing you are conveniently dismissing
> Bruninho... is that you often claimed that Piquet
> didn't do particularly well in his debut year
> because he lacked testing.
>
> When in actual fact he had ample testing.
He did not had ample testing, how many times I have to say that Hamilton tested more than him. I wasnt saying that just 1 test Bruno was ready to go. I was expecting more tests but Honda took the plug out of F1 before that.
> As I'd have pointed out. He had between 2-3 tests with
> BMW Williams, he had a test with BAR Honda, and he
> was official test driver at Renault for a season
> before his debut, which saw him make his first
> test for the team at Silverstone September 2006,
> same as Hamilton, and he was quickest on his first
> two days! Bruno Senna was not quickest, not even
> slightly.
>
So? It was his first day. Give him a proper winter testing season with a 2009 car and he'd kick their asses at Melbourne.
> So compared with comprehensive winter test seasons
> for Piquet + his tryouts for Williams and BAR,
> Senna would have had about 1 and a half days, if
> he is lucky. Yet somehow you think the would pwn
> all.
>
> That is so delusional it's almost funny.
delusional and almost funny is you thinking that I said that with just 1 day of testing he was ready to pwn them all. I said "if he was that good with just 1 day of testing, imagine how he will be after more testing."
Is it hard to understand? ffs...