GPGSL S7 [SEASON COMPLETED!!!] Rule Changes Announced For S8.
Posted by GPGSL
JohnMaverick Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nothing against JW personally, but both in
> Melbourne (here for sure) and in Suzuka (maybe) he
> had a bit of an advantage coming from the lack of
> a second pitstop, even with the 12.5 seconds
> penalty. It's crappy that this bug occurs, for
> sure, and it's definitely eye-catching that it
> always happens to JW this season, but generally I
> think that 12.5 isn't enough. I agree, however,
> that 25 seconds would be too much on the other
> hand. So, I'd vote for something in the middle
> like 16-18 seconds. But that's only my personal 2
> cents and I'm aware that a change of this rule is
> unlikely to happen.
Am I right in saying that this bug can also be contributed to the track slot used on the mod? I remember from my race director days that in certain track slots there are particular errors that occur - engine failures tend to happen consistently to specific drivers for example? I didn't look into this too much but was simply wondering if the races this season have all been run in the same track slot?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nothing against JW personally, but both in
> Melbourne (here for sure) and in Suzuka (maybe) he
> had a bit of an advantage coming from the lack of
> a second pitstop, even with the 12.5 seconds
> penalty. It's crappy that this bug occurs, for
> sure, and it's definitely eye-catching that it
> always happens to JW this season, but generally I
> think that 12.5 isn't enough. I agree, however,
> that 25 seconds would be too much on the other
> hand. So, I'd vote for something in the middle
> like 16-18 seconds. But that's only my personal 2
> cents and I'm aware that a change of this rule is
> unlikely to happen.
Am I right in saying that this bug can also be contributed to the track slot used on the mod? I remember from my race director days that in certain track slots there are particular errors that occur - engine failures tend to happen consistently to specific drivers for example? I didn't look into this too much but was simply wondering if the races this season have all been run in the same track slot?
brunoboi Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> JohnMaverick Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Nothing against JW personally, but both in
> > Melbourne (here for sure) and in Suzuka (maybe)
> he
> > had a bit of an advantage coming from the lack
> of
> > a second pitstop, even with the 12.5 seconds
> > penalty. It's crappy that this bug occurs, for
> > sure, and it's definitely eye-catching that it
> > always happens to JW this season, but generally
> I
> > think that 12.5 isn't enough. I agree, however,
> > that 25 seconds would be too much on the other
> > hand. So, I'd vote for something in the middle
> > like 16-18 seconds. But that's only my personal
> 2
> > cents and I'm aware that a change of this rule
> is
> > unlikely to happen.
>
> Am I right in saying that this bug can also be
> contributed to the track slot used on the mod? I
> remember from my race director days that in
> certain track slots there are particular errors
> that occur - engine failures tend to happen
> consistently to specific drivers for example? I
> didn't look into this too much but was simply
> wondering if the races this season have all been
> run in the same track slot?
I'd say that's a no, Tom - the trackpack has each track in the specific slot in the calendar (i.e. Melbourne slot 1, Surfer's Paradise slot 2, Suzuka slot 3 etc.).
I'd say it's just horrendously bad luck.
EDIT: Activity deadline has passed, people! Report up in a few moments
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/22/2012 10:01PM by Diax F1.
-------------------------------------------------------
> JohnMaverick Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Nothing against JW personally, but both in
> > Melbourne (here for sure) and in Suzuka (maybe)
> he
> > had a bit of an advantage coming from the lack
> of
> > a second pitstop, even with the 12.5 seconds
> > penalty. It's crappy that this bug occurs, for
> > sure, and it's definitely eye-catching that it
> > always happens to JW this season, but generally
> I
> > think that 12.5 isn't enough. I agree, however,
> > that 25 seconds would be too much on the other
> > hand. So, I'd vote for something in the middle
> > like 16-18 seconds. But that's only my personal
> 2
> > cents and I'm aware that a change of this rule
> is
> > unlikely to happen.
>
> Am I right in saying that this bug can also be
> contributed to the track slot used on the mod? I
> remember from my race director days that in
> certain track slots there are particular errors
> that occur - engine failures tend to happen
> consistently to specific drivers for example? I
> didn't look into this too much but was simply
> wondering if the races this season have all been
> run in the same track slot?
I'd say that's a no, Tom - the trackpack has each track in the specific slot in the calendar (i.e. Melbourne slot 1, Surfer's Paradise slot 2, Suzuka slot 3 etc.).
I'd say it's just horrendously bad luck.
EDIT: Activity deadline has passed, people! Report up in a few moments
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/22/2012 10:01PM by Diax F1.
GPGSL Activity Check Report
The activity check for the date range 12/01/12 (9PM) - 22/01/12 (9PM) has been completed.
Three drivers will be penalised for their inactivity:
Christian Dux (Scuderia Minardi) - Last Post "January 05, 2012 08:21AM"
Chris Stokel (MAC Racing) - Last Post "December 27, 2011 11:20AM"
Josh Mertz (Martini Paddock Racing) - Last Post "January 11, 2012 01:03AM"
Mertz and Dux are on their first warning, so thus will receive 20 point penalties.
Stokel is on his second warning, and will receive a further 20 point penalty. For the next two races, it will not be possible for MAC Racing to have Stokel as their race driver.
All penalties will be applied for the next race at Montreal.
GPGSL
The activity check for the date range 12/01/12 (9PM) - 22/01/12 (9PM) has been completed.
Three drivers will be penalised for their inactivity:
Christian Dux (Scuderia Minardi) - Last Post "January 05, 2012 08:21AM"
Chris Stokel (MAC Racing) - Last Post "December 27, 2011 11:20AM"
Josh Mertz (Martini Paddock Racing) - Last Post "January 11, 2012 01:03AM"
Mertz and Dux are on their first warning, so thus will receive 20 point penalties.
Stokel is on his second warning, and will receive a further 20 point penalty. For the next two races, it will not be possible for MAC Racing to have Stokel as their race driver.
All penalties will be applied for the next race at Montreal.
GPGSL
Out of interest dean (this isnt an official protest or anything 
), but does Christian (reve-san) referring to another thread where he indicates he will be inactive not count as holiday notification? Just to clarify thats all
_________________________________________________
For a list of EVERY download for GP4, look here: [docs.google.com]
), but does Christian (reve-san) referring to another thread where he indicates he will be inactive not count as holiday notification? Just to clarify thats all _________________________________________________
For a list of EVERY download for GP4, look here: [docs.google.com]
truecrysis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Out of interest dean (this isnt an official
> protest or anything), but does Christian
> (reve-san) referring to another thread where he
> indicates he will be inactive not count as holiday
> notification? Just to clarify thats all
It's a grey area, by all means - but apart from anything else, he said he would be 'less active', not inactive.
Here's the post he made on the GP2 Manager thread:
I'm not convinced that it counts as a 'holiday' personally (which will definitely sound harsh, considering he's my team-mate).
Others may disagree. I'm open to discuss it, though.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Out of interest dean (this isnt an official
> protest or anything
), but does Christian> (reve-san) referring to another thread where he
> indicates he will be inactive not count as holiday
> notification? Just to clarify thats all
It's a grey area, by all means - but apart from anything else, he said he would be 'less active', not inactive.
Here's the post he made on the GP2 Manager thread:
Quote
Reve-san
Hey guys. I´m so sorry to disappoint you again, but several reasons are keeping me from doing the coverages: First of all, a colleague of me has holidays since last week, so I need to do double the work then normal. Second, I´ll be replaced at the beginning of february and will then only have to work one or two days a week. While this might seem good for the manager, it is absolutely bad for me personal, so I hope everyone of you understands if I spend more time writing applications than working on the manager.
pycku schrieb:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As for driver negotiations - who will announce the
> news?
Third: My girlfriend wants to spend a LOT of time with me lately, so I´ve only been home on tuesday this week, and will probably just be home at saturday. So, negotiations results will be up this weekend.
As for the silverstone race: If you don´t mind, I can just upload the results, which will spare me about 3 hours of work. I was so intelligent to save the whole results on my phone, so I would be able to do that from my girlfriend with no problems.
I'm not convinced that it counts as a 'holiday' personally (which will definitely sound harsh, considering he's my team-mate).
Others may disagree. I'm open to discuss it, though.
Diax F1 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> truecrysis Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Out of interest dean (this isnt an official
> > protest or anything), but does Christian
> > (reve-san) referring to another thread where he
> > indicates he will be inactive not count as
> holiday
> > notification? Just to clarify thats all
>
> It's a grey area, by all means - but apart from
> anything else, he said he would be 'less active',
> not inactive.
>
> Here's the post he made on the GP2 Manager
> thread:
>
> Hey guys. I´m so sorry to disappoint you again,
> but several reasons are keeping me from doing the
> coverages: First of all, a colleague of me has
> holidays since last week, so I need to do double
> the work then normal. Second, I´ll be replaced at
> the beginning of february and will then only have
> to work one or two days a week. While this might
> seem good for the manager, it is absolutely bad
> for me personal, so I hope everyone of you
> understands if I spend more time writing
> applications than working on the manager.
>
> pycku schrieb:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > As for driver negotiations - who will announce
> the
> > news?
>
> Third: My girlfriend wants to spend a LOT of time
> with me lately, so I´ve only been home on tuesday
> this week, and will probably just be home at
> saturday. So, negotiations results will be up this
> weekend.
>
> As for the silverstone race: If you don´t mind, I
> can just upload the results, which will spare me
> about 3 hours of work. I was so intelligent to
> save the whole results on my phone, so I would be
> able to do that from my girlfriend with no
> problems.
>
> I'm not convinced that it counts as a 'holiday'
> personally (which will definitely sound harsh,
> considering he's my team-mate).
>
> Others may disagree. I'm open to discuss it,
> though.
In my view, that seals it. Less active is not the same as inactive.
GPGSL - Christel VXR team Boss S6-S8, S12 Onwards
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/22/2012 10:54PM by CaptinFranko.
-------------------------------------------------------
> truecrysis Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Out of interest dean (this isnt an official
> > protest or anything
), but does Christian> > (reve-san) referring to another thread where he
> > indicates he will be inactive not count as
> holiday
> > notification? Just to clarify thats all
>
> It's a grey area, by all means - but apart from
> anything else, he said he would be 'less active',
> not inactive.
>
> Here's the post he made on the GP2 Manager
> thread:
>
> Hey guys. I´m so sorry to disappoint you again,
> but several reasons are keeping me from doing the
> coverages: First of all, a colleague of me has
> holidays since last week, so I need to do double
> the work then normal. Second, I´ll be replaced at
> the beginning of february and will then only have
> to work one or two days a week. While this might
> seem good for the manager, it is absolutely bad
> for me personal, so I hope everyone of you
> understands if I spend more time writing
> applications than working on the manager.
>
> pycku schrieb:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > As for driver negotiations - who will announce
> the
> > news?
>
> Third: My girlfriend wants to spend a LOT of time
> with me lately, so I´ve only been home on tuesday
> this week, and will probably just be home at
> saturday. So, negotiations results will be up this
> weekend.
>
> As for the silverstone race: If you don´t mind, I
> can just upload the results, which will spare me
> about 3 hours of work. I was so intelligent to
> save the whole results on my phone, so I would be
> able to do that from my girlfriend with no
> problems.
>
> I'm not convinced that it counts as a 'holiday'
> personally (which will definitely sound harsh,
> considering he's my team-mate).
>
> Others may disagree. I'm open to discuss it,
> though.
In my view, that seals it. Less active is not the same as inactive.
GPGSL - Christel VXR team Boss S6-S8, S12 Onwards
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/22/2012 10:54PM by CaptinFranko.
Incident 2k9 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yeah, it's quite an interesting point. He did
> mention it, but he should have just quickly
> mentioned it here. It would be quite harsh to
> penalise him, but then again rules is rules.
>
> Compromise with a warning perhaps, send him a PM
> saying that he needs to just take 5 minutes to pop
> a post in, and this should fix the situation. My 2
> cents on the matter...
Nice thought there, but he hasn't been on for 15 days. Knowing my luck, his inbox will be full
Personally, the fact that he posted a note on here was fine enough (after all, PMs to me, Marko, the GPGSL account etc. count as holiday notice - so a note saying check the other thread wouldn't be an issue, to me).
The issue I have is the content of what he said. He never said he would be 'inactive' - just 'less active'. In my eyes, it is as Chris has said in the post above. 'Less active' is not the same as 'inactive', and never will be.
...no OP view for the moment - sound issues
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 01/22/2012 11:03PM by Diax F1.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yeah, it's quite an interesting point. He did
> mention it, but he should have just quickly
> mentioned it here. It would be quite harsh to
> penalise him, but then again rules is rules.
>
> Compromise with a warning perhaps, send him a PM
> saying that he needs to just take 5 minutes to pop
> a post in, and this should fix the situation. My 2
> cents on the matter...
Nice thought there, but he hasn't been on for 15 days. Knowing my luck, his inbox will be full
Personally, the fact that he posted a note on here was fine enough (after all, PMs to me, Marko, the GPGSL account etc. count as holiday notice - so a note saying check the other thread wouldn't be an issue, to me).
The issue I have is the content of what he said. He never said he would be 'inactive' - just 'less active'. In my eyes, it is as Chris has said in the post above. 'Less active' is not the same as 'inactive', and never will be.
...no OP view for the moment - sound issues
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 01/22/2012 11:03PM by Diax F1.
Looking forward to the video coverage! Tis hard work to make a video, i know that for sure.
On the point i raised above, i agree about the penalty, no offence to christian, but i think the fact that he stated he could post the results from his phone if he needed too kinda shows he could post from his phone, and of course he never stated he would be inactive, only less active. Was simply clarifying a possible argument point
_________________________________________________
For a list of EVERY download for GP4, look here: [docs.google.com]
On the point i raised above, i agree about the penalty, no offence to christian, but i think the fact that he stated he could post the results from his phone if he needed too kinda shows he could post from his phone, and of course he never stated he would be inactive, only less active. Was simply clarifying a possible argument point
_________________________________________________
For a list of EVERY download for GP4, look here: [docs.google.com]
Anyway, in preparation for the next race of the calendar, here is an updated OP (from the one towards the start of the thread)
An RD is required for Round 4 Montreal, step up!
[www.mediafire.com] Some say you should click it, you know you want to. [www.gp4central.com] <----GP4 Central
[www.mediafire.com] Some say you should click it, you know you want to.
[www.gp4central.com] <----GP4 Centralmortal Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> An RD is required for Round 4 Montreal, step up!
I'm doing the coverage mate - told Stu earlier today and he was more than happy
-------------------------------------------------------
> An RD is required for Round 4 Montreal, step up!
I'm doing the coverage mate - told Stu earlier today and he was more than happy
Diax F1 Schreef:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Anyway, in preparation for the next race of the
> calendar, here is an updated OP (from the one
> towards the start of the thread)
>
>
Awesome opening theme!! I am in there so it rocks!!
Race starts: 141 | Points: 886 | Podiums: 35 | Race wins: 10
Follow me on: Twitter | Instagram | Facebook
-------------------------------------------------------
> Anyway, in preparation for the next race of the
> calendar, here is an updated OP (from the one
> towards the start of the thread)
>
>
Awesome opening theme!! I am in there so it rocks!!
Race starts: 141 | Points: 886 | Podiums: 35 | Race wins: 10
Follow me on: Twitter | Instagram | Facebook
Charrel Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Diax F1 Schreef:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Anyway, in preparation for the next race of the
> > calendar, here is an updated OP (from the one
> > towards the start of the thread)
> >
> >
>
> Awesome opening theme!! I am in there so it
> rocks!!
The 3 driver screenshots near the end 'change' with each round (R1 had me, Danny Thomas and Chris Hinz - never got around to doing ones for R2 and R3)
Glad you like it though
-------------------------------------------------------
> Diax F1 Schreef:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Anyway, in preparation for the next race of the
> > calendar, here is an updated OP (from the one
> > towards the start of the thread)
> >
> >
>
> Awesome opening theme!! I am in there so it
> rocks!!
The 3 driver screenshots near the end 'change' with each round (R1 had me, Danny Thomas and Chris Hinz - never got around to doing ones for R2 and R3)
Glad you like it though
If my opinion matters i'd like to share it with you all.
I saw the post of Christian where he stated he would be 'less-active.' I already had a bad feeling about this.
Christian should have known that if he would not be posting in the activity check window he SHOULD tell us about it in this forum. There's no reason to refer us to another forum. He could have simply copied pasted the message he wrote in the other forum part.
Mabey it's my fault for not pm'ing him about this when i saw the message earlier. Given he didnt say he would be on holidays given he did say he would be LESS active instead of NOT ACTIVE at all. I think a penaltie should be applied here.
We dont want rumours where Dean is said to be protective of the drivers of the team he's in. We don't want anyone able to say its not fair for a new member to be inactive without a penalty and someone who is in for years gets -20 perf points.
I am sorry for Christian that he has to learn the specifics of this rule the hard way but we do need to keep everything justified for every single member of the series.
I'm really sorry Christian ! Just thought i should need to express my opinion aswell.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"If in doubt, Flat out."
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/23/2012 01:07AM by Rico.
I saw the post of Christian where he stated he would be 'less-active.' I already had a bad feeling about this.
Christian should have known that if he would not be posting in the activity check window he SHOULD tell us about it in this forum. There's no reason to refer us to another forum. He could have simply copied pasted the message he wrote in the other forum part.
Mabey it's my fault for not pm'ing him about this when i saw the message earlier. Given he didnt say he would be on holidays given he did say he would be LESS active instead of NOT ACTIVE at all. I think a penaltie should be applied here.
We dont want rumours where Dean is said to be protective of the drivers of the team he's in. We don't want anyone able to say its not fair for a new member to be inactive without a penalty and someone who is in for years gets -20 perf points.
I am sorry for Christian that he has to learn the specifics of this rule the hard way but we do need to keep everything justified for every single member of the series.
I'm really sorry Christian ! Just thought i should need to express my opinion aswell.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"If in doubt, Flat out."
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/23/2012 01:07AM by Rico.
Stoopid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The reason its 12.5 and not 25 is because the
> driver one stopping also runs with worn tyres for
> longer and also on a heavier fuel load. If you
> look at the fastest laps, John was the slowest
> driver out there, so he did well to even cross the
> line first. That in part is due to the track and
> there not being a great many places to pass.
> Monaco would be even worse, so 12.5 seconds
> doesn't seem enough. However, when you take into
> account tracks such as Monza, Montreal and Spa, he
> would just be a sitting duck, so 12.5 seems really
> harsh! It's a compromise really.
>
> Sure, you feel hard done by Rod, but have you
> thought how hard done by John is, 3 races in a row
> that could have been so much different?
I understood... thanks for explain me! =D
One Racing driver and team manager
GPGSL-3: champion in 2007/2013/2014!
GPGSL-4: testdrivers champion in Season 11!
-------------------------------------------------------
> The reason its 12.5 and not 25 is because the
> driver one stopping also runs with worn tyres for
> longer and also on a heavier fuel load. If you
> look at the fastest laps, John was the slowest
> driver out there, so he did well to even cross the
> line first. That in part is due to the track and
> there not being a great many places to pass.
> Monaco would be even worse, so 12.5 seconds
> doesn't seem enough. However, when you take into
> account tracks such as Monza, Montreal and Spa, he
> would just be a sitting duck, so 12.5 seems really
> harsh! It's a compromise really.
>
> Sure, you feel hard done by Rod, but have you
> thought how hard done by John is, 3 races in a row
> that could have been so much different?
I understood... thanks for explain me! =D
One Racing driver and team manager
GPGSL-3: champion in 2007/2013/2014!
GPGSL-4: testdrivers champion in Season 11!
Rico Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If my opinion matters i'd like to share it with
> you all.
>
> I saw the post of Christian where he stated he
> would be 'less-active.' I already had a bad
> feeling about this.
> Christian should have known that if he would not
> be posting in the activity check window he SHOULD
> tell us about it in this forum. There's no reason
> to refer us to another forum. He could have simply
> copied pasted the message he wrote in the other
> forum part.
>
> Mabey it's my fault for not pm'ing him about this
> when i saw the message earlier. Given he didnt say
> he would be on holidays given he did say he would
> be LESS active instead of NOT ACTIVE at all. I
> think a penaltie should be applied here.
> We dont want rumours where Dean is said to be
> protective of the drivers of the team he's in. We
> don't want anyone able to say its not fair for a
> new member to be inactive without a penalty and
> someone who is in for years gets -20 perf points.
>
> I am sorry for Christian that he has to learn the
> specifics of this rule the hard way but we do need
> to keep everything justified for every single
> member of the series.
>
> I'm really sorry Christian ! Just thought i should
> need to express my opinion aswell.
I have to agree with Rico about this. Sorry Christian!
5 x WCC - S5, S6, S7, S8, S10 | 4 x WDC - S5 Nick van der Voort ; S6, S7, S8 Ed Greenhalgh | 2 x WTC - S6 Stuart Ingers; S8 Andrei Sevastian
-------------------------------------------------------
> If my opinion matters i'd like to share it with
> you all.
>
> I saw the post of Christian where he stated he
> would be 'less-active.' I already had a bad
> feeling about this.
> Christian should have known that if he would not
> be posting in the activity check window he SHOULD
> tell us about it in this forum. There's no reason
> to refer us to another forum. He could have simply
> copied pasted the message he wrote in the other
> forum part.
>
> Mabey it's my fault for not pm'ing him about this
> when i saw the message earlier. Given he didnt say
> he would be on holidays given he did say he would
> be LESS active instead of NOT ACTIVE at all. I
> think a penaltie should be applied here.
> We dont want rumours where Dean is said to be
> protective of the drivers of the team he's in. We
> don't want anyone able to say its not fair for a
> new member to be inactive without a penalty and
> someone who is in for years gets -20 perf points.
>
> I am sorry for Christian that he has to learn the
> specifics of this rule the hard way but we do need
> to keep everything justified for every single
> member of the series.
>
> I'm really sorry Christian ! Just thought i should
> need to express my opinion aswell.
I have to agree with Rico about this. Sorry Christian!
5 x WCC - S5, S6, S7, S8, S10 | 4 x WDC - S5 Nick van der Voort ; S6, S7, S8 Ed Greenhalgh | 2 x WTC - S6 Stuart Ingers; S8 Andrei Sevastian
Cool theme! Good job! :D
Jenson drives it like he owns it; Lewis drives it like he stole it
GPGSL Canadian Grand Prix Performance Files
Race Drivers Perf
** GP3edit - Performance File **
[Team #00]
Name=Aston Martin,Racing
Performance=795,815,1100
First Driver=1,Ed Greenhalgh,16146,569,16175,570
Second Driver=2,John Warrington,16066,584,16092,584
[Team #01]
Name=Shadow,Subaru
Performance=791,811,1100
First Driver=3,Marko Aleksander,16122,591,16149,589
Second Driver=4,Ruben Greidanus,16069,583,16086,591
[Team #02]
Name=True North,BMW
Performance=784,804,793
First Driver=5,Norbert Horváth,16049,596,16079,593
Second Driver=6,Glen Sheppard,16041,597,16075,591
[Team #03]
Name=ART,Ford
Performance=789,809,1000
First Driver=7,Carlos Rodriguez,16090,591,16113,598
Second Driver=8,Rodrigo Vilela,16058,581,16083,589
[Team #04]
Name=MPR,Lancia
Performance=790,810,900
First Driver=9,Charrel Jalving,16117,575,16143,576
Second Driver=10,John Maverick,16064,585,16090,586
[Team #05]
Name=SCR,Holden
Performance=786,806,1000
First Driver=11,Ross Cartwright,16101,592,16134,587
Second Driver=12,Daniel Thomas,16083,600,16109,600
[Team #06]
Name=ScalaGP,MotoriModerni
Performance=784,804,900
First Driver=14,Gianluigi Silvestre,16024,595,16053,588
Second Driver=15,Zsigmond Somogyi,16100,600,16133,593
[Team #07]
Name=Minardi,MotoriModerni
Performance=783,803,788
First Driver=16,Ben Johnson,16094,599,16122,600
Second Driver=17,Dean Kittleson,16102,589,16124,588
[Team #08]
Name=Christel,VXR
Performance=787,807,763
First Driver=18,Jack Elleker,16050,585,16072,588
Second Driver=19,Michael Pedersen,16058,578,16073,592
[Team #09]
Name=Snake,Motorsports
Performance=784,804,773
First Driver=20,Tommi Karjalainen,16100,578,16124,581
Second Driver=21,Nick Worseling,16032,595,16067,584
[Team #10]
Name=MAC,Racing
Performance=786,806,1100
First Driver=22,Christopher Hinz,16090,590,16112,593
Second Driver=23,Jack Hunsley,16035,595,16067,593
[File]
Version=215
[Tyres]
Team #00=0
Team #01=1
Team #02=1
Team #03=1
Team #04=0
Team #05=1
Team #06=1
Team #07=0
Team #08=1
Team #09=0
Team #10=1
[Gears]
Team #00=7
Team #01=7
Team #02=7
Team #03=7
Team #04=7
Team #05=7
Team #06=7
Team #07=7
Team #08=7
Team #09=7
Team #10=7
Test Drivers Perf
** GP3edit - Performance File **
[Team #00]
Name=Aston Martin,Racing
Performance=795,815,1100
First Driver=24,Stuart Ingers,16113,590,16145,585
Second Driver=25,Adam Davies,16115,581,16134,588
[Team #01]
Name=Shadow,Subaru
Performance=791,811,1100
First Driver=26,Tobias Kederer,16116,570,16139,576
Second Driver=27,Tom Pellatt,16083,587,16106,594
[Team #02]
Name=True North,BMW
Performance=784,804,793
First Driver=28,Daniel Mills,16063,580,16095,579
Second Driver=29,Owen Edwards,16042,591,16066,595
[Team #03]
Name=ART,Ford
Performance=789,809,1000
First Driver=30,Jake Legge,16034,592,16074,581
Second Driver=31,Stefan van Renselaar,16051,591,16076,592
[Team #04]
Name=MPR,Lancia
Performance=790,810,900
First Driver=32,Dan Paddock,16131,570,16155,573
Second Driver=33,Josh Mertz,16007,593,16038,592
[Team #05]
Name=SCR,Holden
Performance=786,806,1000
First Driver=34,Maikel de Boer,16053,578,16081,579
Second Driver=35,Joseph Gilson,16038,591,16063,594
[Team #06]
Name=ScalaGP,MotoriModerni
Performance=784,804,900
First Driver=36,Matteo Scala,16045,596,16079,590
Second Driver=37,Juliano Muller,16042,590,16065,594
[Team #07]
Name=Minardi,MotoriModerni
Performance=783,803,788
First Driver=38,Ricardo van Smirren,16041,591,16087,573
Second Driver=39,Christian Dux,16009,591,16038,592
[Team #08]
Name=Christel,VXR
Performance=787,807,763
First Driver=40,Connor Steer,16077,595,16103,599
Second Driver=41,Gary Spencer,16033,587,16060,590
[Team #09]
Name=Snake,Motorsports
Performance=784,804,773
First Driver=42,Deyan Rangelov,16002,598,16037,593
Second Driver=43,Mal Stoddart,16047,592,16075,595
[Team #10]
Name=MAC,Racing
Performance=786,806,1100
First Driver=44,Chris Stokel,15981,600,16011,600
Second Driver=45,Nathan McGregor,16078,600,16106,600
[File]
Version=215
[Tyres]
Team #00=0
Team #01=1
Team #02=1
Team #03=0
Team #04=1
Team #05=1
Team #06=0
Team #07=1
Team #08=0
Team #09=1
Team #10=1
[Gears]
Team #00=7
Team #01=7
Team #02=7
Team #03=7
Team #04=7
Team #05=7
Team #06=7
Team #07=7
Team #08=7
Team #09=7
Team #10=7
Team Boosts
Aston Martin,Racing - 4
Shadow,Subaru - 4
ART,Ford - 3
MPR,Lancia - 2
SCR,Holden - 3
ScalaGP,MotoriModerni - 2
MAC,Racing - 4
Race Driver Boosts
Ed Greenhalgh
Marko Aleksander
Carlos Rodriguez
Charrel Jalving
Ross Cartwright
Daniel Thomas
Zsigmond Somogyi
Ben Johnson
Dean Kittleson
Tommi Karjalainen
Christopher Hinz
Test Driver Boosts
Stuart Ingers
Adam Davies
Tobias Kederer
Tom Pellatt
Dan Paddock
Connor Steer
Nathan McGregor
Race Drivers Perf
** GP3edit - Performance File **
[Team #00]
Name=Aston Martin,Racing
Performance=795,815,1100
First Driver=1,Ed Greenhalgh,16146,569,16175,570
Second Driver=2,John Warrington,16066,584,16092,584
[Team #01]
Name=Shadow,Subaru
Performance=791,811,1100
First Driver=3,Marko Aleksander,16122,591,16149,589
Second Driver=4,Ruben Greidanus,16069,583,16086,591
[Team #02]
Name=True North,BMW
Performance=784,804,793
First Driver=5,Norbert Horváth,16049,596,16079,593
Second Driver=6,Glen Sheppard,16041,597,16075,591
[Team #03]
Name=ART,Ford
Performance=789,809,1000
First Driver=7,Carlos Rodriguez,16090,591,16113,598
Second Driver=8,Rodrigo Vilela,16058,581,16083,589
[Team #04]
Name=MPR,Lancia
Performance=790,810,900
First Driver=9,Charrel Jalving,16117,575,16143,576
Second Driver=10,John Maverick,16064,585,16090,586
[Team #05]
Name=SCR,Holden
Performance=786,806,1000
First Driver=11,Ross Cartwright,16101,592,16134,587
Second Driver=12,Daniel Thomas,16083,600,16109,600
[Team #06]
Name=ScalaGP,MotoriModerni
Performance=784,804,900
First Driver=14,Gianluigi Silvestre,16024,595,16053,588
Second Driver=15,Zsigmond Somogyi,16100,600,16133,593
[Team #07]
Name=Minardi,MotoriModerni
Performance=783,803,788
First Driver=16,Ben Johnson,16094,599,16122,600
Second Driver=17,Dean Kittleson,16102,589,16124,588
[Team #08]
Name=Christel,VXR
Performance=787,807,763
First Driver=18,Jack Elleker,16050,585,16072,588
Second Driver=19,Michael Pedersen,16058,578,16073,592
[Team #09]
Name=Snake,Motorsports
Performance=784,804,773
First Driver=20,Tommi Karjalainen,16100,578,16124,581
Second Driver=21,Nick Worseling,16032,595,16067,584
[Team #10]
Name=MAC,Racing
Performance=786,806,1100
First Driver=22,Christopher Hinz,16090,590,16112,593
Second Driver=23,Jack Hunsley,16035,595,16067,593
[File]
Version=215
[Tyres]
Team #00=0
Team #01=1
Team #02=1
Team #03=1
Team #04=0
Team #05=1
Team #06=1
Team #07=0
Team #08=1
Team #09=0
Team #10=1
[Gears]
Team #00=7
Team #01=7
Team #02=7
Team #03=7
Team #04=7
Team #05=7
Team #06=7
Team #07=7
Team #08=7
Team #09=7
Team #10=7
Test Drivers Perf
** GP3edit - Performance File **
[Team #00]
Name=Aston Martin,Racing
Performance=795,815,1100
First Driver=24,Stuart Ingers,16113,590,16145,585
Second Driver=25,Adam Davies,16115,581,16134,588
[Team #01]
Name=Shadow,Subaru
Performance=791,811,1100
First Driver=26,Tobias Kederer,16116,570,16139,576
Second Driver=27,Tom Pellatt,16083,587,16106,594
[Team #02]
Name=True North,BMW
Performance=784,804,793
First Driver=28,Daniel Mills,16063,580,16095,579
Second Driver=29,Owen Edwards,16042,591,16066,595
[Team #03]
Name=ART,Ford
Performance=789,809,1000
First Driver=30,Jake Legge,16034,592,16074,581
Second Driver=31,Stefan van Renselaar,16051,591,16076,592
[Team #04]
Name=MPR,Lancia
Performance=790,810,900
First Driver=32,Dan Paddock,16131,570,16155,573
Second Driver=33,Josh Mertz,16007,593,16038,592
[Team #05]
Name=SCR,Holden
Performance=786,806,1000
First Driver=34,Maikel de Boer,16053,578,16081,579
Second Driver=35,Joseph Gilson,16038,591,16063,594
[Team #06]
Name=ScalaGP,MotoriModerni
Performance=784,804,900
First Driver=36,Matteo Scala,16045,596,16079,590
Second Driver=37,Juliano Muller,16042,590,16065,594
[Team #07]
Name=Minardi,MotoriModerni
Performance=783,803,788
First Driver=38,Ricardo van Smirren,16041,591,16087,573
Second Driver=39,Christian Dux,16009,591,16038,592
[Team #08]
Name=Christel,VXR
Performance=787,807,763
First Driver=40,Connor Steer,16077,595,16103,599
Second Driver=41,Gary Spencer,16033,587,16060,590
[Team #09]
Name=Snake,Motorsports
Performance=784,804,773
First Driver=42,Deyan Rangelov,16002,598,16037,593
Second Driver=43,Mal Stoddart,16047,592,16075,595
[Team #10]
Name=MAC,Racing
Performance=786,806,1100
First Driver=44,Chris Stokel,15981,600,16011,600
Second Driver=45,Nathan McGregor,16078,600,16106,600
[File]
Version=215
[Tyres]
Team #00=0
Team #01=1
Team #02=1
Team #03=0
Team #04=1
Team #05=1
Team #06=0
Team #07=1
Team #08=0
Team #09=1
Team #10=1
[Gears]
Team #00=7
Team #01=7
Team #02=7
Team #03=7
Team #04=7
Team #05=7
Team #06=7
Team #07=7
Team #08=7
Team #09=7
Team #10=7
Team Boosts
Aston Martin,Racing - 4
Shadow,Subaru - 4
ART,Ford - 3
MPR,Lancia - 2
SCR,Holden - 3
ScalaGP,MotoriModerni - 2
MAC,Racing - 4
Race Driver Boosts
Ed Greenhalgh
Marko Aleksander
Carlos Rodriguez
Charrel Jalving
Ross Cartwright
Daniel Thomas
Zsigmond Somogyi
Ben Johnson
Dean Kittleson
Tommi Karjalainen
Christopher Hinz
Test Driver Boosts
Stuart Ingers
Adam Davies
Tobias Kederer
Tom Pellatt
Dan Paddock
Connor Steer
Nathan McGregor
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.