Adelaide Street Circuit rebuilt first pictures

Well, the CC-Line not working at all except for the first part of the lap up till about the first sector point.

super__alonso...


thanks friend!

Track-Packs 1988-1991-1993-1994-1995-1997-1999

Is anyone working on a CC line for the track?



"There are some pikeys there at Turn 10 putting tarmac down - what do you think of that?" - Martin Brundle

A CC-line is a quick job, shouldn't take days to make, so there's no point to say that someone is "working" on it.

But, surely someone will make one if he has a bit of free time. I'll have some free time on Thursday, if nobody makes a CC-line until then, I'll do it.


My unfinished tracks: [www.grandprixgames.org]
Send bug reports and track editing questions to f1virtualblog@gmail.com

Prblanco Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A CC-line is a quick job, shouldn't take days to
> make, so there's no point to say that someone is
> "working" on it.
>
> But, surely someone will make one if he has a bit
> of free time. I'll have some free time on
> Thursday, if nobody makes a CC-line until then,
> I'll do it.


Wasn't aware it was a quick thing to do, but glad you are on it...



"There are some pikeys there at Turn 10 putting tarmac down - what do you think of that?" - Martin Brundle

Use this track for the CC-Line

[rapidshare.com]

Jagdpanzer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Wasn't aware it was a quick thing to do, but glad
> you are on it...


That'S quite relative if you consider making thorough ingame test with attention to speed and car behaviour. Sorting out problems and inaccuracies can be quite time consuming.
I once spent 4 hours for one cc-line That's an extreme example but the track had very challenging and tricky corners so that I had to rebuild some sections two or three times to get it right and smooth





Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/05/2007 11:16PM by Ruboy.

Yep mate when I said quick, I meant it doesn't take days... that's my definition of "quick" when talking about tracks


My unfinished tracks: [www.grandprixgames.org]
Send bug reports and track editing questions to f1virtualblog@gmail.com

Prblanco Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yep mate when I said quick, I meant it doesn't
> take days... that's my definition of "quick" when
> talking about tracks

That's absoluely right, too

Iv'e got some issues with the bridges. The textures are dissapearing!!! They are not transparent. The bridges were imported from the original melbourne track as they are the same.









The gum trees I imported from another hi-res track. I think they look great!!

Convert one texture to DXT1+Semi transparency (I painted red circle around texture), because it's now DXT5+Full transparency and that's reason for your problem with the bridges.

Is there any way to use the same texture for both the track and the other bits of tarmac(run-offs, etc)., so it looks more seamless?


F1archives * Facebook * YouTube

Berger_Fan schreef:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Is there any way to use the same texture for both
> the track and the other bits of tarmac(run-offs,
> etc)., so it looks more seamless?


Yes and no, you can use the same tarmac texture for the track and run-offs, but ingame GP4 makes the tarmac texture of the track darker.

---

My Grand Prix 4 Files
I'm a total dick. How many people can say that?

in game the track (.bin) uses the maps\tarmacmap.tex and not what you see in GP4 Builder for instance.
There are ways to make it all the same - use no bin, use more bin, or use a different bin

____
Tony

b-tone Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> in game the track (.bin) uses the
> maps\tarmacmap.tex and not what you see in GP4
> Builder for instance.
> There are ways to make it all the same - use no
> bin, use more bin, or use a different bin


What does 'more' .bin mean?

b-tone Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> in game the track (.bin) uses the
> maps\tarmacmap.tex and not what you see in GP4
> Builder for instance.

I always wondered why did my track always use the original track texture instead of the one I wanted.. it works now!

more bin - a trick from MarioB to use the pitverge bin for more than just pitverge. For instance if the track has another unused layout, you can make that, convert the bin, and rename the bin to pitverge.

What I'd really like is more bin options, or convert 3d to bin, or something like that.

____
Tony

That's a really great idea...never thought about it. It was always a graphical problem when there was another layout...it just never looked very good when using the alternative layout as a normal object with normal textures. I noticed that the DTM tracks looked much better concerning this and I wondered why
Btw, how are the alternative track sections named? The must be TRACK class, right? The real layout is named from TRACK_00 undtil TRACK_XX. Which names do you use for the other layout to avoid conflicts?

I asked Lo2k about another bin feature in the track editing thread. It could make track tarmac even more realistic.

I need some help with editing the .dat file. The finish line is too far forward. It should be at the end of the pit buildings. Also the pit lane exit is wrong with the kerb. Before the CC-Line is made could someone move the finish line back and fix the pit exit?? Its not like I can't move the finish line back 9 sectors, but it is adding the 9 sectors after the finish line and having the spacing correct as well as fixing bankings, verges, walls etc.. I can fix the .gp4 file

Diagram:


The finish line needs to be moved back to the double red line and the section of pit lane deleted and added at the exit. Sectors have to be added between lines.

Circuit:

[www.filefactory.com]



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/10/2007 08:16AM by super__alonso.

Moving the finish line is easy.. but that will mean you'll have to make a cc-line all over again.