France V2.0 coming soon

next work will be montreal we think and melbourne we want to do, too.
somebody is working on hungary, so at the moment we do not want to make it.
the cc-line in the first two sectors is from the original GP4...so it has to work...
Hi-res version will follow. We hope today or tomorrow...

France 2005 v1.5 hi-res is now available...#


[ralfsfw26.cybton.com]



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/31/2005 12:36PM by GPGeneration.

Oh great!!!!

what is to change at montreal? is it only pitlane?

---

X (@ed24f1)

I think that the 180 corner was moved, so that the straights before and after it are now shorter

---

its was nice when i drove a quickrace in the rain but when i drove over the bridegestone ''b'' just before the last chicane it dissappeard when i was almost over it, know what i mean? else i can make a screenshot i think

---

If you are racing, keep on racing and get some points!

GPG Super League S11 | Driver #41 | Team-manager | Snake Motorsports Racing Group | Next Race: Emmeloord - Flevoland GP | Constructors: 10th | Best Race Finish: 1st
GPG Super League Season 9 Testers Champion*

yes the 180 corner was moved, so that the straights are shorter, because there was not enough (i don't know whats the name "Auslaufzone" place, when you have an accident.

Runoff you mean maybe?

Thank you, I have test it and I have the same problem... but it isn't really a bug. there is a problem in the *.gp4 files. The logo is in the wrong section. I will fix it an than i load a new *.gp4 file up which you must copy in the wad...



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 08/31/2005 01:12PM by GPGeneration.

ok, i look forward to the Montreal update, and more in the future!

---

X (@ed24f1)

Fantastic Track! Really great work.

Does anyone else notice the tarmac momentarily flickering at the revised Chateau d'Eue corner? It seems to vanish for a second when you drive over it (from any on-board view).

we know about this problem. ralfsfw26 has it, too but i not. so it has to do with something else, graphics may be mapping and so on.
we do not know.

If the tarmac is disappearing entirely, (I assume you have a working .bin) then it maybe because the wrong texture is displayed underneath, or the .bin has more parts than it needs. I experienced a similar problem when working on an oval, and my current Valencia. If neither of those work, then try deleting the last sector in the .dat, create the .bin files, then add the sector again.

I think this problem doesn't happen on every pc because of resolutions perhaps, but I'm not sure



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/31/2005 07:50PM by zeppelin101.

thanks for high resolution. once again ur team did good work.

i am looking forward for new MONTREAL LAYOUT i mean new pitlane and shorter straight lines.that would be great for GP4.

TWO new good tracks upto now is SHANGAI and FRANCE,wow.GP4 can survive more than i expected maybe life long.

===================================================================================================================
i7 950@4GHZ 1.24V|Asus P6X58D-E|Dominators 10GB(2GBx5)1600C8|Corsair H70|Corsair 800D|Corsair HX850|EVGA,Zotac GTX 2x470|VX2433W FULL HD|X-Fi Plantinum|Creative S750 Gigaworks7.1|NZXT Sentry 2|7TB



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/31/2005 08:37PM by sunil.

Thanks... glad it's not just me with the tarmac problem. I'm not technically competent with track editing, so I'm afraid I'll have to be content to fiddle with graphics settings and if that doesn't work, be patient and live with it until an update is released.

I believe you guys have just taken the hi res texures that already were made for the track cause the same bug is still present when at low res the signs are ok. Look at the screenshots what i mean what is wrong !!







Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/04/2005 05:15AM by Bigbrother.

that just needs the mapping to be inverted and that's it

---

I'm against sigpics

The hi-res track was a work with mini maestro and he made the older hi-res version.
it's not new, we said it...
we did only the low-res textures on our own.

but isn't it possible to fix this ???

sure it's possible

---

I'm against sigpics