You're also ignoring the fact that Sim studied motorsport engineering (or something along those lines). He's got a lot more knowledge in this field than most of the forum put together.
Yes autogyro, different constructions and designs of materials have different properties under different stresses, be they prolonged or sudden, of which composites are of course much more susceptible to failure under loads, individually, they weren't designed for than that of most metals, but the side-impact tests are in place almost exclusively to test this sort of crash, so those impact-absorbent structures are there to safe-guard a driver in side-on collisions.
You undermine your own argument by using steel as a example. Comparing side-impacts in those closed-cockpit cars has no relevance here, both because of the use of steel vs composites and more importantly the lack of a tub in such cars. Any roll-cage can be rendered useless in any given impact. I'd go as far as arguing a composite tub is safer in any directional impact, until secondary impacts are taken into account.
//edit: I keep looking at Sato's crash and still haven't decided if the
right rear suspension collapses before it spins. Everything suggests otherwise, but in one of the replay shots it does look as though it rotates towards the rear of the car slightly. It could just be the camber deceiving me. I'm staggered they red-flagged the session. I'm mildly surprised they continued to show yellows. I know if 1 car can crash, so can another, but still - any impact would have been at 30-40mph tops maybe, and they didn't need to keep marshals in the firing line.
Nice to see a BMW on pole, but I can't help but feel it's just another Melbourne with a car optimised entirely for qualifying that will just fail miserably in the race. Kimi looks very, very heavy.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/05/2008 04:41PM by gav.