SchueyFan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Instead of immature ridiculing, how about trying
> to back up your opinion with some facts or
> evidence and trying to have a proper discussion?
Instead of immaturely arguing with obvious facts because you don't like reading about them, why don't you pay said facts a bit more attention? It's obvious to all but Massa fanboys that a driver of Trulli's calibre is more talented. What each driver achieved on paper in terms of on-track results is no reflection on that. Take a closer look at the performance of each driver, at what each driver was able to do with the car they were driving throughout their career so far. It's night and day.
Like I say, I can't believe you're wanting to have this discussion at all, because there's nothing to discuss. On natural talent, Trulli > Massa. Immature ridiculing? Try common sense!
And sorry if I come across pretty abrasive here, but I have a low tolerance for being asked silly questions.
gav Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nah, I mean 95. Again, he had the leading pace
> despite carrying twice the fuel, doing a 1-stop
> race to Hill's 2-stop.
Fair enough, my bad there. I guess I'm still a bit quick to think of the most dominating performances as being the ones that involve winning from the front... He did drive a lot of stunning races like that throughout 95.
bob197724 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> OH Dear
>
> Ferrari have given Massa a vote of confidence. So
> 2/3 races before he gets replaced by Perez then.
Hmmm, we'll see, but yeah, that seems a bit ominous. As said already though, it'll probably just be a straight swap between him and Perez if they choose Perez to replace him; actually that would work out pretty nicely for everyone involved.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/23/2012 07:52PM by EC83.