Forse la domanda non era per me, ma io non sto un gran che.
Vader schrieb:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That would negate the nature of a question,
> yes even of communication itself. Asking questions
> is part of communication. Communication can never
> be a one way road. Constructing a question that
> can't trigger off any kind of response would defy
> its purpose.
>
> Or in other words: it's within the definition of
> "question" that at least searching for an answer
> is essential. May it be a final answer, an "I
> don't know" or at least an "I'll have to think
> about about it."
>
> The only possible way would be if someone asked
> you a question in language you don't understand
> and you fail to notice that it was a question. It
> is, however, disputable if a question that is not
> being recognized as such (for what reason ever) is
> a question at all. It has been encoded as a
> question by communicator A but communicator B
> failed to decode it, thus it is a question on the
> side of the speaker but not on the side of
> recipient ...
>
> I recommend to read Watzalawick.
That's a really nice answer. But can't things that weren't intended as a question (such as my very "That's a really nice answer."
be interpreted as such? Don't all statements imply in a question? Not the one that (maybe) motivated the statement, but a question that comes after the statement?
Um dois três quatro cinco seis sete oito nove dezEins zwei drei vier fünf sechs sieben acht neun zehnOne two three four five six seven eight nine tenОдин два три четыре пять шесть семь восемь девять десять