GPGSL S7 [SEASON COMPLETED!!!] Rule Changes Announced For S8.
Posted by GPGSL
Ok so spa, great classic track, always good to drive here. Although with the boost...hoping that me and gary set a lap in free practise, then it rains ruining everyone elses laps all session giving us a 1-2, me first of course 
*starts hollering and doing a rain dance*
_________________________________________________
For a list of EVERY download for GP4, look here: [docs.google.com]
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/17/2012 11:34PM by truecrysis.
*starts hollering and doing a rain dance*
_________________________________________________
For a list of EVERY download for GP4, look here: [docs.google.com]
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/17/2012 11:34PM by truecrysis.
Turbo Lover schrieb:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Get your facts right mate. Zandvoort was in season
> 3 for the first time on the calendar. After the
> trouble in the season 4 race, Zandvoort was
> replaced by Assen in season 5. Zandvoort was in
> season 6 back on the calendar when I adjusted the
> cc-line and magic data. I even ran the race myself
> without trouble. That double pitting happened also
> before at Hockenheim in season 5, this proves that
> it is not necessary track related. What about the
> problem that the second driver of the first team
> only makes one stop? This occurred on many tracks,
> maybe we should ban those tracks as well despite
> it's also related to the game itself.
I never said that double-pitting would only occur at Zandvoort, I just said it happens accumulated at Zandvoort and your test was a prove for that. As for the seasons, you're right. I mixed that up and meant S4 and S6. S4 was a real chaos and as for S6, it's a pity that the coverage isn't online anymore. But there were also unusual happenings in S6, like Jack running from last to 9th (okay, that alone is not that uncommon yet) and Charrel slipping from pole to 21st and then back to 8th (basically what happened to Marko this time).
Either way, what are we discussing here now? We're both no members of the board (anymore, for you) and so can't decide anything. But it's a fact that this season the race was everything but smooth again and as a member of this series I think it's my good right to ask the board for an investigation. This is what I've done and that doesn't give you the right to attack me personally. And by the way, I said from the beginning on that this is only, unless there's a bug-free version of Zandvoort, which this time it was not. With that the topic is closed for me and I'll see what the board decides.
GPGSL : Team Owner of 'Maverick Track Performance' (MTP)
-------------------------------------------------------
> Get your facts right mate. Zandvoort was in season
> 3 for the first time on the calendar. After the
> trouble in the season 4 race, Zandvoort was
> replaced by Assen in season 5. Zandvoort was in
> season 6 back on the calendar when I adjusted the
> cc-line and magic data. I even ran the race myself
> without trouble. That double pitting happened also
> before at Hockenheim in season 5, this proves that
> it is not necessary track related. What about the
> problem that the second driver of the first team
> only makes one stop? This occurred on many tracks,
> maybe we should ban those tracks as well despite
> it's also related to the game itself.
I never said that double-pitting would only occur at Zandvoort, I just said it happens accumulated at Zandvoort and your test was a prove for that. As for the seasons, you're right. I mixed that up and meant S4 and S6. S4 was a real chaos and as for S6, it's a pity that the coverage isn't online anymore. But there were also unusual happenings in S6, like Jack running from last to 9th (okay, that alone is not that uncommon yet) and Charrel slipping from pole to 21st and then back to 8th (basically what happened to Marko this time).
Either way, what are we discussing here now? We're both no members of the board (anymore, for you) and so can't decide anything. But it's a fact that this season the race was everything but smooth again and as a member of this series I think it's my good right to ask the board for an investigation. This is what I've done and that doesn't give you the right to attack me personally. And by the way, I said from the beginning on that this is only, unless there's a bug-free version of Zandvoort, which this time it was not. With that the topic is closed for me and I'll see what the board decides.
GPGSL : Team Owner of 'Maverick Track Performance' (MTP)
Looking forward to SPA. Me (more or less) and MSC debuting at the same track... AMAZING. Hope not to crash and finish the session.
____
____
To me, the double pitting issue was caused by the rain falling just as the first pit-stop window opened. It can happen on any circuit.
5 x WCC - S5, S6, S7, S8, S10 | 4 x WDC - S5 Nick van der Voort ; S6, S7, S8 Ed Greenhalgh | 2 x WTC - S6 Stuart Ingers; S8 Andrei Sevastian
5 x WCC - S5, S6, S7, S8, S10 | 4 x WDC - S5 Nick van der Voort ; S6, S7, S8 Ed Greenhalgh | 2 x WTC - S6 Stuart Ingers; S8 Andrei Sevastian
truecrysis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ive just noticed the title, is it saying its the
> french GP a genuine error, or am i just missing a
> joke completely? Probably the latter, i've had no
> sleep with the F1 being on this weekend lol.
Belgium, France, close enough eh? :p
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ive just noticed the title, is it saying its the
> french GP a genuine error, or am i just missing a
> joke completely? Probably the latter, i've had no
> sleep with the F1 being on this weekend lol.
Belgium, France, close enough eh? :p
these title jokes becomes harder and harder to choose I suppose
truecrysis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ok so spa, great classic track, always good to
> drive here. Although with the boost...hoping that
> me and gary set a lap in free practise, then it
> rains ruining everyone elses laps all session
> giving us a 1-2, me first of course
>
> *starts hollering and doing a rain dance*
>
>
If I join you in the rain dance, AND give you first dibs on the buffet table afterwards, could I entice you into letting me top the timesheets?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ok so spa, great classic track, always good to
> drive here. Although with the boost...hoping that
> me and gary set a lap in free practise, then it
> rains ruining everyone elses laps all session
> giving us a 1-2, me first of course
>
> *starts hollering and doing a rain dance*
>
>
If I join you in the rain dance, AND give you first dibs on the buffet table afterwards, could I entice you into letting me top the timesheets?
Turbo Lover Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> JohnMaverick Schreef:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Turbo Lover schrieb:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Get your facts right mate. Zandvoort was in
> > season
> > > 3 for the first time on the calendar. After
> the
> > > trouble in the season 4 race, Zandvoort was
> > > replaced by Assen in season 5. Zandvoort was
> in
> > > season 6 back on the calendar when I adjusted
> > the
> > > cc-line and magic data. I even ran the race
> > myself
> > > without trouble. That double pitting happened
> > also
> > > before at Hockenheim in season 5, this proves
> > that
> > > it is not necessary track related. What about
> > the
> > > problem that the second driver of the first
> > team
> > > only makes one stop? This occurred on many
> > tracks,
> > > maybe we should ban those tracks as well
> > despite
> > > it's also related to the game itself.
> >
> >
> > I never said that double-pitting would only
> occur
> > at Zandvoort, I just said it happens
> accumulated
> > at Zandvoort and your test was a prove for
> that.
> > As for the seasons, you're right. I mixed that
> up
> > and meant S4 and S6. S4 was a real chaos and as
> > for S6, it's a pity that the coverage isn't
> online
> > anymore. But there were also unusual happenings
> in
> > S6, like Jack running from last to 9th (okay,
> that
> > alone is not that uncommon yet) and Charrel
> > slipping from pole to 21st and then back to 8th
> > (basically what happened to Marko this time).
> >
> > Either way, what are we discussing here now?
> We're
> > both no members of the board (anymore, for you)
> > and so can't decide anything. But it's a fact
> that
> > this season the race was everything but smooth
> > again and as a member of this series I think
> it's
> > my good right to ask the board for an
> > investigation. This is what I've done and that
> > doesn't give you the right to attack me
> > personally. And by the way, I said from the
> > beginning on that this is only, unless there's
> a
> > bug-free version of Zandvoort, which this time
> it
> > was not. With that the topic is closed for me
> and
> > I'll see what the board decides.
>
>
>
> You're the only one that demands consequences for
> Zandvoort, so it is not strange that my different
> view on the matter becomes 'personal'. About
> drivers rocketing from the end of the grid to the
> front, in the Nations Cup this season Team France
> was starting at Piranema in 21st place and was
> finishing in sixth place without boost. At Le Mans
> Team France was starting from last place but
> finishing in 8th place without boost. Odd things
> happens on every track and Zandvoort is no
> exception. Although I'm not an official member of
> the board anymore, I'm still linked to it as an
> advisor. So that explains more or less the urge to
> put things into perspective with this matter.
> Topic closed.
>
>
>
>
> Stoopid Schreef:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > To me, the double pitting issue was caused by
> the
> > rain falling just as the first pit-stop window
> > opened. It can happen on any circuit.
>
>
> Nope, both cars had the same amount of fuel which
> wouldn't be a problem if the cars where running
> more spread out of each other. That wasn't sadly
> the case with Ed running in 1st place and John in
> 4th place.
I don't want Zandvoort on the calendar but rather than shouting about it, I'm simply not going to vote for it
-------------------------------------------------------
> JohnMaverick Schreef:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Turbo Lover schrieb:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Get your facts right mate. Zandvoort was in
> > season
> > > 3 for the first time on the calendar. After
> the
> > > trouble in the season 4 race, Zandvoort was
> > > replaced by Assen in season 5. Zandvoort was
> in
> > > season 6 back on the calendar when I adjusted
> > the
> > > cc-line and magic data. I even ran the race
> > myself
> > > without trouble. That double pitting happened
> > also
> > > before at Hockenheim in season 5, this proves
> > that
> > > it is not necessary track related. What about
> > the
> > > problem that the second driver of the first
> > team
> > > only makes one stop? This occurred on many
> > tracks,
> > > maybe we should ban those tracks as well
> > despite
> > > it's also related to the game itself.
> >
> >
> > I never said that double-pitting would only
> occur
> > at Zandvoort, I just said it happens
> accumulated
> > at Zandvoort and your test was a prove for
> that.
> > As for the seasons, you're right. I mixed that
> up
> > and meant S4 and S6. S4 was a real chaos and as
> > for S6, it's a pity that the coverage isn't
> online
> > anymore. But there were also unusual happenings
> in
> > S6, like Jack running from last to 9th (okay,
> that
> > alone is not that uncommon yet) and Charrel
> > slipping from pole to 21st and then back to 8th
> > (basically what happened to Marko this time).
> >
> > Either way, what are we discussing here now?
> We're
> > both no members of the board (anymore, for you)
> > and so can't decide anything. But it's a fact
> that
> > this season the race was everything but smooth
> > again and as a member of this series I think
> it's
> > my good right to ask the board for an
> > investigation. This is what I've done and that
> > doesn't give you the right to attack me
> > personally. And by the way, I said from the
> > beginning on that this is only, unless there's
> a
> > bug-free version of Zandvoort, which this time
> it
> > was not. With that the topic is closed for me
> and
> > I'll see what the board decides.
>
>
>
> You're the only one that demands consequences for
> Zandvoort, so it is not strange that my different
> view on the matter becomes 'personal'. About
> drivers rocketing from the end of the grid to the
> front, in the Nations Cup this season Team France
> was starting at Piranema in 21st place and was
> finishing in sixth place without boost. At Le Mans
> Team France was starting from last place but
> finishing in 8th place without boost. Odd things
> happens on every track and Zandvoort is no
> exception. Although I'm not an official member of
> the board anymore, I'm still linked to it as an
> advisor. So that explains more or less the urge to
> put things into perspective with this matter.
> Topic closed.
>
>
>
>
> Stoopid Schreef:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > To me, the double pitting issue was caused by
> the
> > rain falling just as the first pit-stop window
> > opened. It can happen on any circuit.
>
>
> Nope, both cars had the same amount of fuel which
> wouldn't be a problem if the cars where running
> more spread out of each other. That wasn't sadly
> the case with Ed running in 1st place and John in
> 4th place.
I don't want Zandvoort on the calendar but rather than shouting about it, I'm simply not going to vote for it
Bring on the racing in the rain!!!!
@JohnM, @JohnW, @ Ruben, guys guys, stay cool, keep your calm! in times of financial crisis we can not afford to go to war.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"If in doubt, Flat out."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"If in doubt, Flat out."
Rico Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> @JohnM, @JohnW, @ Ruben, guys guys, stay cool,
> keep your calm! in times of financial crisis we
> can not afford to go to war.
I'm so cool I could quite happily live in a freezer :D I meant my comment in a nice way, no malice intended. Looking forward to Spa
-------------------------------------------------------
> @JohnM, @JohnW, @ Ruben, guys guys, stay cool,
> keep your calm! in times of financial crisis we
> can not afford to go to war.
I'm so cool I could quite happily live in a freezer :D I meant my comment in a nice way, no malice intended. Looking forward to Spa
I know you didnt mate no worries.
JohnWarrington Schreef:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rico Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > @JohnM, @JohnW, @ Ruben, guys guys, stay cool,
> > keep your calm! in times of financial crisis we
> > can not afford to go to war.
>
> I'm so cool I could quite happily live in a
> freezer :D I meant my comment in a nice way, no
> malice intended. Looking forward to Spa
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"If in doubt, Flat out."
no worries.JohnWarrington Schreef:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rico Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > @JohnM, @JohnW, @ Ruben, guys guys, stay cool,
> > keep your calm! in times of financial crisis we
> > can not afford to go to war.
>
> I'm so cool I could quite happily live in a
> freezer :D I meant my comment in a nice way, no
> malice intended. Looking forward to Spa
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"If in doubt, Flat out."
Latest, accurate version of Spa
[www.mediafire.com] Some say you should click it, you know you want to.
[www.gp4central.com] <----GP4 Central
[www.mediafire.com] Some say you should click it, you know you want to.
[www.gp4central.com] <----GP4 CentralI dont know, all you guys who are complaining about Zandvoort. Personally, i think it is fine. I will be voting for it for EVERY season, given that I have won EVERY race I have contested there!!!!
GPGSL Team Owner Debut - Melbourne, Season 8 - present
GPGSL Test Debut - Hungary, Season 4. GPGSL Race Debut - Adelaide, Season 5.
GPGSL Team Owner Debut - Melbourne, Season 8 - present
GPGSL Test Debut - Hungary, Season 4. GPGSL Race Debut - Adelaide, Season 5.
My vote is probably biased; but is a lottery one off not good for random factor reasons?
And indeed, I wish there were more wet/changable races. Bring them on!
Jenson drives it like he owns it; Lewis drives it like he stole it
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/19/2012 11:11AM by danm.
And indeed, I wish there were more wet/changable races. Bring them on!
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/19/2012 11:11AM by danm.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.