"piss poor" would describe both Webber in Australia and Vettel in Spa. But I don't recall anyone claiming Webber should be banned (see BBC forum) or all of the childish sh*t that got posted in this thread.
Regarding the penalties, the more you look at it the more it's broken.
Webber takes out Lewis - no penalty
Webber takes out a Lotus - no penalty
Lewis violates safety car rules - no penalty until a complaint is filed, then a useless penalty is applied.
Several incidents involving cars being released dangerously in the pit lane have been ignored.
Trulli has an accident under yellow - no penalty
Going by this you'd be forgiven for thinking that they were relaxing the penalty rules, but no.
Schumacher attempts to run Barrichello into the wall - penalty
Vettel runs into Button - penalty
Vettel gets too far from the back of the safety car - penalty
Glock passes under yellow - penalty
Schumacher takes advantage of a rules loophole at Monaco - penalty
I REALLY don't understand the logic. Are they say what Vettel did at Hungary when he was too far from the safety car (which violated the letter of the rules, but not what the rule was intended for) was worse than Webbers mistake at Australia? Trulli ran into another car under yellow flag conditions, but this was seen as acceptable, whilst Glock was penalised just for passing another car under yellow.
The way penalties should work needs to be simplified. To me, Webber and Vettel should not have been penalised for the accidents they have caused. They were mistakes. Silly mistakes, but mistakes none-the-less. Penalties should be reserved for actions which purposely violate the rules or purposely create dangerous situations - Schumacher at Hungary for example.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.netSportsCarArchives.com