EC83 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'm inclined to agree with verdict of 60/40
> Vettel's fault. There's a fine line in that kind
> of situation between being brilliant and being
> utterly stupid, and Seb stepped over it rather
> epically here. I'm also surprised and disappointed
> that he wasn't apologetic when interviewed
> afterwards, it's always been one of his saving
> graces when he's screwed up in the past(Melbourne
> 2009 for example). And doing the crazy sign after
> the crash might have been a kneejerk reaction, but
> he was miles off there IMO. To me it smacked of a
> belief that it had been his right to have Webber
> jump out of his way and not contest the position,
> which is un-Vettel-like and does surprise me.
DaveEllis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Interesting onboard from Webber there on the BBC.
> He actually turned LEFT into Vettel, then Vettel
> appears in frame and only then does Mark move
> right, as Vettel pulls ahead.
>
> It seems like Vettel decided "I'm going through
> here, if you want to have an accident then lets go
> have an accident".
This sums it up for me, apart from the 40% Webber issue. Webber left the door open and closed it too late. He chose to make it inches tight. When Hamilton and Button had at it, they had up to a cars width between them in the braking zone. If you want to put it all on the line, then this is what can happen. BOTH opted for "you will submit or crash!", and @#$%& happened. Webbers major fault was, that he STAYED in on Vettel after the pass was completed! The smart thing to do as a racer, would be to zoom out into the ideal line and set Vettel up for the chicane, exactly as it happened with Button and Hamilton. Vettel focused on the brake marker and getting to the turn in. A more experienced driver would have kept his eye on Webber.
It's only after we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything.