RFactor Mods/Updates/Fixes/Links/News

indeed, i actually prefer to play with the FormulaIS cars as i can pretend its a series. i find it hard to pretend to be playing f1 in non f1 cars/helmets/circuits etc. but hey thats just me probably.

great work with the tracks, its nice to have some proper ones, not as twisty as the rf ones.

---

since there making f1c tracks into rfactor tracks. cant they make the shapes into rfactor too. i want the fw26 shape for my team the default shapes good but i want somethin origional lol

it should'nt be too difficult, i believe the damage model is very similar to F1C? anyone know if theres a plugin for Z-mod so you can save the shapes as .GMT files?

there isnt yet..

Kimi, so, Massa Fernando Sebastian is faster than you. Can you confirm you understood that message?

is there a link that works for the F1 mini mod ?? thanks

---

Magic Senna

i'm still looking for a working link for the beta of suzuka




LS's Tip of the week
ESSENTIAL OILS aren't essential unless you're an engine, a gearbox or a twat

[rapidshare.de]

OS: WinXP Professional 5.1 CPU: Intel Pentium D, 2.8 GHz Monitor: Packard Bell 17" Video: Ati HD4850 512MB DDR3 Sound: Sound Blaster Audigy Memory: 2GB DDR2 HD: 200 GB DirectX: 9.0c

Suzuka 2002 Mirror

[www.menudeimotori.com]

Cheers Alex

That Rapidshare system is shite, i hate it and have yet to actually get a download to work

It says my IP is already downloading a file for some reason




LS's Tip of the week
ESSENTIAL OILS aren't essential unless you're an engine, a gearbox or a twat

I've read at racesim central that some people have used GTR circuits, is this true?

And how do you go about doing this?




LS's Tip of the week
ESSENTIAL OILS aren't essential unless you're an engine, a gearbox or a twat

Yes its true. They wont be released because its illegal.

Looking at the pics of Suzuka and Melborune, these conversions are pretty shocking...

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com

people have been using graphics from GTR tracks\conversions as they are already in dds format

i havent and wont dload these tracks.

Dave is rite.

there ace for f1c etc.. but rfactor well its a joke

im not saying they're bad conversions or anything... im just saying.. why.. wat is the point in them?

---

"Trulli was slowing down like he wanted to have a picnic" LOL

Tried Suzuka, and whilst chet wont say it, i will, its crap! Its just shockingly bad in every way. Grip levels feel off, the graphics are crap, the pace car doesnt work, pit lane lights dont work, the author hasnt even put in work to make the menus look respectable, hes just used F1C ripped stuff.

If anything kills rFacotr, its the massive influx of shockingly bad conversions we're about to get.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com

Like you say Dave, what rFactor needs is people like Redline making tracks from a clean sheet.

Im looking forward to these tools for for rfactor that will eventually get...

www.footballsfinestgfx.co.uk

DaveEllis Escrito:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Tried Suzuka, and whilst chet wont say it, i will,
> its crap! Its just shockingly bad in every way.
> Grip levels feel off, the graphics are crap, the
> pace car doesnt work, pit lane lights dont work,
> the author hasnt even put in work to make the
> menus look respectable, hes just used F1C ripped
> stuff.
>
> If anything kills rFacotr, its the massive influx
> of shockingly bad conversions we're about to get.
>
>
>
> vMax.Ellis
> Velocity Maximum Simulation Racing
> www.vMaxSR.com


if you do not like, you do not use it, nobody forces to you



OS: WinXP Professional 5.1 CPU: Intel Pentium D, 2.8 GHz Monitor: Packard Bell 17" Video: Ati HD4850 512MB DDR3 Sound: Sound Blaster Audigy Memory: 2GB DDR2 HD: 200 GB DirectX: 9.0c

Im not using it...But this is exactly what people voiced concerns over. There is no standard, people are editing there tracks all over the place with different grip levels. I've seen at least 3 different Suzuka grip settings. How much is that going to screw up online? I've seen a whole bunch of modified grip settings for the default tracks and more and more people are complaining of mismatches online. Same problems as the F1C community. They dont go for quality over quantity and nobody works together to create a base system to keep things in check.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/16/2005 06:09PM by DaveEllis.

They are shockingly bad and while I welcomed a quick go at Imola just to see how the F1 cars fared on a real F1 track now its just getting rediculous. Theres an official track list at RSC though that sorts the proper tracks from the conversions and if this develops into a full track database like GPL has it shouldnt be a problem, we can easily stay away from these abysmal tracks and not miss any good ones.

does someone has a link for the f1 minimod that works?

---

Magic Senna