Vader schrieb:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What is so bad about Star Trek-Enterprise?
>
> Gene Roddenberry had a vision - a vison of a
> brighter future were common sense ruled and there
> was always a way to get together. Not national
> pride or patriotism, but tolerance and
> understanding were the keywords. It was about a
> global community living together in peace and
> harmony. It somewhat carried a spark of the ideals
> of The Enlightment. Star Trek Enterprise is
> completely different. For me it is propaganda in
> its ugliest form. It does not portray a global
> dream, it glorifies the American Dream. Why do you
> think the villians are called Suliban (=Taliban)?
> I am pretty sure Roddenberry would have hated its
> political orientation, since it completely lacks
> all philosophical background. Politics without
> ethics are dangerous.
> Enterprise is aweful in every respect. Plus
> Captain Jonathan Archer looks like they actually
> wanted Harrison Ford but couldn't afford to pay
> him. Did I mention that I can't stabnd Harrison
> Ford either since that horrible piece of patriotic
> propaganda crap Air Force 1?
O really? And what about Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country?
At first this film should be about joung Kirk and Spock, but after Fall of the Wall in east europe,
the scenario was changed to version like we know it today.
So they compared Klingons with Russia, Ukraine, Poland, east Germany .... And that isn't propaganda??
And where did you seen Harrison Ford there. As which Character? Indiana Jones, Han Solo or US President?
Anyway Archer is complete different person and one of the best starfleet captains in Star Trek
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------