The Chinese Grand Prix Thread *** EXPECT SPOILERS!!!***

Posted by iCeMaN pAuL 
That was one crap race. Downforce mmust go, now!!
i must say that was one of the worst races i have ever seen really boring no action nothing at all
An entertaining season, well done for putting on a good show Kimi and Alonso!!

I must agree with you guys though, that track is disgusting. One series of open esses bleed into the next then, oh here's a rather long straight then it's all over for another lap. Even just putting trees around it would help. They be planning something like this surely!??

worst year of my f1 watching life
i hate Alonso ,i hate Renault
we should have won
the ugliset race
renault were fast becuase they used there two races engine for one race
Kimi did not have that luxuray,Monotya too (no way to risk a retirment)
we had every thing thise year
(engine failure-tyre failure-drive shaft failuer-suspension failure-hydrolic failuer-lapped poeple crashing into us-gear box failuer)but a track failuer, :) that was the funniset
Renault didn't realy deserve this,it just shows how unfair the f1 world is
Mclaren is allways the team to loose .

and here are some funny caputers to make up for the bad race:

oh noh....


----
Michael Shcumacher finding out why u should never make fun of the helicopter pilote





-------------------------
gooooz fra ba
-------------------------




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/17/2005 05:25AM by Hakkinenf1.
haha that's 2nd pic is good

i kind of agree, having the fastest car by far for 14 races does make you think mclaren deserve something, but then again if they had the fastest car, they must've threw both championships away...



as has been said time and time again, the fastest car doesn't mean it was the best car.

its no good having a car that can lap 1-second-per-lap faster than anyone else, but can't get past half a race distance, is it?

Renault/Alonso fully deserve both titles, McLaren were not robbed, Renault/Alonso won it fair and square.




RIP Jules, never to be forgotten. #KeepFightingMichael




Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 10/17/2005 03:43PM by Muks_C.
ms has been told off for the pre race crash.

That was an example of what could have happened at the USA had they raced at reduced speed like the FIA wanted.
no,it's an example of Schumacher not being attentive enough for whatever reason


Posted by: Hakkinenf1 (IP Logged)
Date: October 17, 2005 05:23AM

worst year of my f1 watching life


Only been watching F1 for 1 year then have we?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com
Re: The Chinese Grand Prix Thread *** EXPECT SPOILERS!!!***
Date: October 17, 2005 07:55PM
Posted by: chet
lol.. 2002 was the worst from the 21st cent imo.

this yea has been fun :)






"Trulli was slowing down like he wanted to have a picnic" LOL
I'd say 2004, or at least the times Ferrari just walked it.
Well done Renault, very deserved Constructors championship.

About Fisicella etting penalty for holding Räikkönen; FIA changed the rules after Spa. They filled the loophole that Mclaren had found, so that no one could do the same again.


My photo gallery: [viltzu86.deviantart.com]
Hakkenenf1, when McLaren can build a car that doesn't stop on a regular basis, then they might deserve to win it. I think Kimi was hard done by at times, but McLaren certainly weren't. As for Alonso, he just made the most of it, just like MS has for years :)

[Website]
Re: The Chinese Grand Prix Thread *** EXPECT SPOILERS!!!***
Date: October 18, 2005 02:45AM
Posted by: danm
alonso was there regularly. kimi wasnt.

i would love to see mclaren win it next year, i hope they do.

never mind, its exciting though!!


Jenson drives it like he owns it; Lewis drives it like he stole it
at least in 2002 ,i watched all races just for fun,anything that could happen was just fine,in our minde Ferrari should have won all,and anything but that was a good race,but this year ,i had to see my team loosing the title the same way he did in ,1999,2000,2001(Michael and David were head to head tell the arraived to Monaco)and 2003,
and i will say it for the last time,Mclaren were unrelibale,but they didn't loose becuase of that
the unreliable related porblems list here again
1-(AUS)Kimi started last
2-(MAL) Kimi had a flat tyre he could have been third
3-(BAH)both Mclaren were the fastest,buy u know there qualifing problem back then
4-(NUR)last lap retirment because of JV flating Kimi's tyre (1)
5-(CAN)Black falg for Montoya (he could have been (2)
6-(SILV)Kimi getting stock behind Schumi,he could have won although he started (11)
7-(HOCK)Montoya's mistake in qualifing he started last and finished (2)
8-(MONZA)Kimi Had a flat tyre
9-(ISTAN)Montoya got knocked by Tiago (3) isntead of (2)
10-(SPA)Monotya got Knocked by Pizzonia (DNF) isntead of (2) {Mclaren lost 8 pts,Renault Gained 2,means 10 pts,}means Mclaren could have won the title by 1 point.
11-(SUZUK)Montoya got knocked by JV

so tell me how much reliblity is related to the stuff above,so plz stop saying Renault deserved it.

-------------------------
gooooz fra ba
-------------------------
4 was KRs fault not JVs you dolt.
5 was mclarens fault.
6 if KR cant get past MS then thats his problem
7 If montoya cant keep the car on the road why does this mean renault dont deserve it?
9 That was montoyas fault not Tiago.

Only an idiot would say Renault didnt deserve the title.
Sil3nt-War Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 4 was KRs fault not JVs you dolt.
> 5 was mclarens fault.
> 6 if KR cant get past MS then thats his problem
> 7 If montoya cant keep the car on the road why
> does this mean renault dont deserve it?
> 9 That was montoyas fault not Tiago.
>
> Only an idiot would say Renault didnt deserve the
> title.


4. that was def'nly stupid JV's fault. what did u saw the race.
9. tiago was just missed to barrichello in the same condition's just b'coz of his fault brakes. in that case he should allow the leaders to pass away clean not follow their ass and hit them.that's what he did to montoya. it's not montoya fault.

yeah, renault deserves this title but purely lucky same with alonso.what a lucky he is. his car got burnt after the race when he came to pitlane in china. what a lucky he was this year.
for sure he drove very well this season but not top most drives in f1 history.

You mustn´t read the press conference after the race. The team asked Alonso to do it.

Fernando, what happened in the pit lane with the engine? Some problem?
FA: It went on fire. My engineers kept on telling me during the in lap to really go on the throttle in the pit lane because it was the last V10 engine racing in Formula One and I was on the throttle and it got on fire a little bit
Re: The Chinese Grand Prix Thread *** EXPECT SPOILERS!!!***
Date: October 18, 2005 09:48AM
Posted by: Ali
"...worst year of my f1 watching life
>i hate Alonso ,i hate Renault
>we should have won
>the ugliset race
>renault were fast becuase they used there two races engine for one race
>Kimi did not have that luxuray,Monotya too (no way to risk a retirment)
>we had every thing thise year
>;(engine failure-tyre failure-drive shaft failuer-suspension failure-hydrolic >failuer-lapped poeple crashing into us-gear box failuer)but a track failuer, >that was the funniset
>Renault didn't realy deserve this,it just shows how unfair the f1 world is
>Mclaren is allways the team to loose..."


Objective, very objective...

"...
>1-(AUS)Kimi started last
>2-(MAL) Kimi had a flat tyre he could have been third
>3-(BAH)both Mclaren were the fastest,buy u know there qualifing problem back >then
>4-(NUR)last lap retirment because of JV flating Kimi's tyre (1)
>5-(CAN)Black falg for Montoya (he could have been (2)
>6-(SILV)Kimi getting stock behind Schumi,he could have won although he started >;(11)
>7-(HOCK)Montoya's mistake in qualifing he started last and finished (2)
>8-(MONZA)Kimi Had a flat tyre
>9-(ISTAN)Montoya got knocked by Tiago (3) isntead of (2)
>10-(SPA)Monotya got Knocked by Pizzonia (DNF) isntead of (2) {Mclaren lost 8 >pts,Renault Gained 2,means 10 pts,}means Mclaren could have won the title by 1 >point.
>11-(SUZUK)Montoya got knocked by JV

>so tell me how much reliblity is related to the stuff above,so plz stop saying >Renault deserved it..."

I don't want to offend you but it is a little funny to see how far your analysis go.
This one is curious: "Kimi getting stock behind Schumi..." I mean, this is F1, I think, that is part of it.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Maintainer: mortal, stephan | Design: stephan, Lo2k | Moderatoren: mortal, TomMK, Noog, stephan | Downloads: Lo2k | Supported by: Atlassian Experts Berlin | Forum Rules | Policy