Look, it is right that M$ didn't make the decision to give JPM a drive-thru penalty. And he probably didn't even have the slightest say in the matter. BUT that is NOT the whole story!
The point is question here is that M$ GAVE jpm the blame, saying that he left him no room, and THAT is clearly a lie! And do not give me any maybe it is not a lie on purpose talk, or M$ might have seen it differently. No one could have seen it better than him. Look at the pic above. The one that is excactly at the moment of impact. You can see it because M$ right front tyre is slightly elevated from the track. Yet it is still far from OFF (on the grass) the track. There can be some dispute, but in the end, there can be no doubts.
It seems that there is room to go around, not much but there IS room. And there was defintely no need to RAM anyone. M$ just had to decide between holding on (ramming) or holding back (losing the lead, which he had lost already). He gambled on the wrong horse, thats all. And he did it in ERROR because he was BEHIND not in front, as can clearly be seen from the pictures before the turn, and the t-cam view from JPM. M$ planted his left tyre between JPM's tyre and bargeboard. So there can be no doubts, that is but as to WHY M$ would give JPM the blame...
I am pretty sure that has to do with those types of rulings that favour M$. As I said, I do not think that M$ has a hand in those rulings. They are made without conspiracy and/or bribery like many would like to claim. I am more certain that it is the awe and HALO effect that gathers around extremely talented and successful drivers (and any that kind of people in general, not only drivers). Its just like with Senna. People are so blinded by the awesome amount of skill and acheivement, that they simply cannot fathom that said person does something wrong. THAT is the reason why M$ time and time again lucks out on the FIA rulings. It is human error but not on the part of M$, but of the FIA stewards.
As to whether or not M$ is AWARE of this halo, and that there is a slip-margin which he can play within, that others cannot, that is an entirely different question. I think that he is. And that is why he layed the blame on JPM, and that is also why M$ hesitated so much when he was asked if he thought the FIA ruling was fair. He hesitated because he IS aware of the HALO, and he does not quite want to lose it. And shedding light on its existance, does put it at risk. If anyone should have had a drive-thru penalty (which I do not think either should have had) it should have been M$.
That is why people are screaming Alex.
On the other hand I can understand you position. You are constantly under siege, and to be honest some of the shots taken are of very poor, even appaling quality, and the forum would certainly be better off without them. But the fact that everyone (or at least some, which we all know the names of) turns black into white, does not give you the right to turn white into black.
Hands down, your hero is a superior driver - one of a kind, no doubt about that. But that does not mean that you cannot strike a balance between admiration and a critical stance (when needed). As I have tried here that one can also adopt a stance of balanced and nuanced critique, instead of "no holds barred combat".
At least thats the story from my point of view.
It's only after we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything.