gav Wrote:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Daniel Knott Wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The ref was utterly biased though - summed up by making us lose
> cos he
> > made carragher take the penalty again - the first one he took
> was
> > brilliant, but cos he had to retake it, he couldn't do the same
> thing
> > again, as the goaley would know. Also, you can't really place it
> if
> > you have to take it again, as the thing with penalties is you
> have to
> > pick your spot and then stick to it with confidence - if you have
> to
> > retake it, especially with a goaley good at saving them, you have
> to
> > change where you put it.
>
> The ref hadn't blown his whistle. How is that bias?
>
> I thought he was alright all match - it's the way it's been throughout
> the tournament - 'soft' tackles punished - that goes for all the
> African teams, Japan, Aussieland, all of us. It's nothing new, it's
> just the way it's been all the way through. I thought Hargreaves early
> 'fouls' were very harsh, but it was fine after that IMO.
>
>
>
> VaderTrophy.com
I thought he had, ok I am sorry. He was very susceptable to portugese play acting though and portugese demands.
Also, what are the rules about keepers on the goal line for penalties?
Is it just before they are kicked?
H E L L O