EricMoinet Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mmmm... I think I'm the one on both of these
> tracks.
>
> CoTA is very hard to do due to its crapy height
> changes, so don't expect to see it before ages.
> Sochi is easier to do : FLAT ! I've made a first
> dat but it is a bit too long at the moment so I
> need to reduce it to the correct lenght before
> first release.
Hi Eric
That sounds very fine. I think a decent/good .dat file is a great start and then we can add other items later on, perhaps the community could join forces in that regard
Regarding CotA I think it must be a hard job to get the elevations right. Perhaps an idea to make a few compromises in order to at least have an Austin layout/track available. But then again, perhaps a correct detailed track is the best - what do other members think of this...??
Thanks Moinet for the fine job in making the .dat files, keep it up