Meanwhile Boba LS has described, elsewhere on this forum, how the FIA have swarmed over the first corner incidents like small flying insects, who's diet primarily consists of decomposing matter, to the Dionaea muscipula. Or in ordinary in english like flies to the Venus Flytrap. What gives? 10 positions for just being invovled?!? Proposed, deliberated and decided in total secrecy within leby Morbid - F1
*crackle-prshhht-crackle* Jean Todt kicks in a point of view: From Jean Todt has defended stewards following criticism of Juan Pablo Montoya's penalty. The Ferrari boss says that mid-race penalties like the one meted out to Montoya are always likely to be controversial. He added that stewards face exactly the same pressures that hamper referees in football games. He told Motorsport Neby Morbid - F1
I know that Alex. I also agree. But I also posted that my opinion was that if anyone should had a penalty, it should have been Michael Schumacher, because he was the one that made the mistake. And I was giving leverage to that opinion with Button as my voice: "Montoya braked late into the first corner and held his line, leaving enough room for Michael. Their scrap was definitely downby Morbid - F1
Williams current position, from ' ... Williams chief operating officer Sam Michael has now said that he will not pass judgement with regards to who was at fault until he has seen the video of the incident. However he has admitted that the team will be asking the FIA for clarification with regards to the incident and the penalty. Michael said: "I want to reserve judgement on the circby Morbid - F1
This might prove a bit interesting: Buttons view on the aaccident and subsequent penalty , from [ [] ]: Jenson Button says Michael Schumacher was responsible for the first-corner collision at Sepang. Juan Pablo Montoya was penalised by stewards for the clash with Schumacher, which left the Ferrari man without a front wing. Button, who finished fourth, agrees with Montoya that he did give Sby Morbid - F1
I just passed 5 (with great grades!) huge exams in 8 weeks. I have a month or two before the dung hits the fan again. So until then I guess you are stuck with me and my monster postsby Morbid - F1
remember how MS squeezed ralf almost into the pitwall last year, jeez that was his own brother and it was dangerous, legal or not. As I said, this thing at Sepang was bound to happen. It has been in the cards since Nürburgring last year. Btw, here is a fresh poll from ITVF1.COM: Did JPM deserve his 'drive-through' penalty? Yes 8.36% (581 votes) No 91.64% (6371 votes) And no I didby Morbid - F1
RoFL! You have a very good point there!by Morbid - Grand Prix 3
That type of argument is generally known in latin as "argumentum ad hominem". I do not expect you to already know what that means, so I will try to explain it. Your are using an argument that attack JPM's personality concerning language usage, and there after connect this to his approach and attitude towards to being a driver, and all the other drivers. But the way that JPM choby Morbid - F1
You might wanna post this at the SDI (creators of GpxPatch) forum. Rene Smith and the hang-arounds are usually very helpful.by Morbid - Grand Prix 3
Hey It worked! Hurrah! I will just sneak off now, rejoice because my puny html code abilities have been increased, and wait for some decency, common sense and reasonability to rejoin the discussion. Remember we are supposed to be friends, right?by Morbid - F1
Sorry for the doublepost. But with the way that this discussion is going, I think that is quite important that I do not let any psycho layout typos on my part go unadressed. So once again here it is, and again sorry for the bother, as I intended it (PLEASE PLEASE PRAY PRAY) 8| Oh come ON!! Have some consistency in your critique! I thought we agreed to discuss this in a respectable way! 1)by Morbid - F1
Uhmm, maybe you should explain what you mean by - attractive drivers -. I mean, I am not applying for any seats, but those who might want to, can misunderstand the term - attractive drivers -. I take it you don't mean good looks right?by Morbid - Grand Prix 3
Ah jeez!!! I forget to switch off the bold somewhere! Now 2/3 of my post looks like I am screaming at the top of my lungsby Morbid - F1
Oh come ON!! Have some consistency in your critique! I thought we agreed to discuss this in a respectable way! 1) Alex first you show us a slideshow of pics claiming that JPM had understeer like M$ had. We all know that a car that understeers wants to continue in a straight line, and it usually comes from carrying to much speed into the corner. So by that argument, both drivers were beyond theby Morbid - F1
Hey canuck do you know the word "fatalism"?by Morbid - F1
"... and that has degraded into a totally polarized black and white picture..."? Ermm... Sorry for the typo. that should have been "has NOT degraded", of course.by Morbid - F1
Hm, I think we would be better off if we reserved the insults for drivers that really do something horrible. For once we have actually created a discussion, that revolves about something with MS in it, and that has degraded into a totally polarized black and white picture. Lets keep it that way. I am really, really tired of the "Schumi - Yupiee! Yeah!" and "Schumi - Booh!Hiss!"by Morbid - F1
I subscribe to that point of view. It is a shame that there has been no pictures from Schumi's t-cam, or from the chopper. That would settle the blame in ernest. I still hold that the blame rests on MS shoulders. But the exercise is quite pointless, since its such a marginal case. It may be an error of judgement, but a side from who ever did it - it wasn't grave (like Irvine and Burtiby Morbid - F1
Sorry Ellis2kX, that I didn't notice that you signed off MSN. I was too caught up in typing this. Ah well! Just goes to show that I really mean what I said.by Morbid - F1
Look, it is right that M$ didn't make the decision to give JPM a drive-thru penalty. And he probably didn't even have the slightest say in the matter. BUT that is NOT the whole story! The point is question here is that M$ GAVE jpm the blame, saying that he left him no room, and THAT is clearly a lie! And do not give me any maybe it is not a lie on purpose talk, or M$ might have seen itby Morbid - F1
I agree with the crazy cannuck. The originals are best, and I even think they look more realistic. The edited ones looked washed out, like someone hosed them with a bleaching agent.by Morbid - Grand Prix 4
LoL! I hadn't thought about that. Females do appear here from time to time. Hmmm... I'd better stick with my original statemant. What if female lurkers get the idea that I will sit on their face, if they one day decide to post something? Can't have that! That would indeed be a very Morbid greeting ritual...by Morbid - Grand Prix 3
And the cover of clouds parted, the sun shined like it have never shined before, thus driving the darkness from the land. And booming voice echoed from north to south, east to west and covered the land and water alike in sound: Welcome to the forum, sitonmyface! No seriously, it is always nice to see new faces around here, although I think I will decline your generous offerby Morbid - Grand Prix 3
Hey Carson, I am probably somewhat on the anti-schumist team, but I think there should room for your sig here, without the "please, don`t complain!". If you feel that there is not, I would be happy to side with you (within reason of course, we can't have 5 megs sized sigs) in a "Freedom for pro-schumi sigs" team.by Morbid - Grand Prix 3