Dictionary for Womens personal ads

ROFL² - ROFL = ROFL (ROFL -1)

ROFL (ROFL-1) = ROFL^2 x -ROFL. And that doesn't equal ROFL² - ROFL.

PWNED

Nick, please go to the San Andreas thread, i have a question for you

EDIT: ignore me, you already went there

---

RIP Jules, never to be forgotten. #KeepFightingMichael



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/19/2006 04:34PM by Muks_C.

So youre saying 2x(2-1) = 2^2 x -2 which equals -8 as oposed to 4-2 which equals 8....oh dear :P

---

Hmm, I really need to relearn that trick

nick you muppet

ROFL(ROFL-1)= (ROFL x ROLF) + (ROFL x -1)
=ROFL² - ROFL

Te hee guess it is Nickv who got PNWED [/end geek mode]

---

I will strike back

No he didn't.

Note the error:

ROFL(ROFL-1)= (ROFL x ROLF) + (ROFL x -1) = ROFL² - ROFL



NickKK Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Te hee guess it is Nickv who got PNWED


gary42 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> nick you muppet
>
> ROFL(ROFL-1)= (ROFL x ROLF) + (ROFL x -1)
> =ROFL² - ROFL

---

It's only after we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything.

Lol that's just evil :P

---

Morbid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No he didn't.
>
> Note the error:
>
> ROFL(ROFL-1)= (ROFL x ROLF) + (ROFL x -1) = ROFL²
> - ROFL
>
>
>
> NickKK Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Te hee guess it is Nickv who got PNWED
>
>
> gary42 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > nick you muppet
> >
> > ROFL(ROFL-1)= (ROFL x ROLF) + (ROFL x -1)
> > =ROFL² - ROFL

RxOxLxF=RxOxFxL
Therefore: ROLF=ROFL

PWNED²

STOP WITH THE MATHS PEOPLE!!!!!!!

---

Everyone knows that million-to-one chances happen 9 times out of 10; indeed, it's a common requirement in fairy tales. If the human didn't have to overcome huge odds, what would be the point? Terry Pratchett - The Science Of Discworld

GPGSL S5 Race driver for IED.

gary42 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Morbid Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > No he didn't.
> >
> > Note the error:
> >
> > ROFL(ROFL-1)= (ROFL x ROLF) + (ROFL x -1) =
> ROFL²
> > - ROFL
> >
> >
> >
> > NickKK Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Te hee guess it is Nickv who got PNWED
> >
> >
> > gary42 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > nick you muppet
> > >
> > > ROFL(ROFL-1)= (ROFL x ROLF) + (ROFL x -1)
> > > =ROFL² - ROFL
>
> RxOxLxF=RxOxFxL
> Therefore: ROLF=ROFL
>
> PWNED²


I bow to your mathematical prowess :D

---

NickKK Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I bow to your mathematical prowess :D

I knew my two maths a-levels would come in useful one day....

Two mistakes do not make a right. Worst cover-up ever!

gary42 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> RxOxLxF=RxOxFxL
> Therefore: ROLF=ROFL
>
> PWNED²

---

It's only after we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything.

Morbid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Two mistakes do not make a right. Worst cover-up
> ever!
>
> gary42 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > RxOxLxF=RxOxFxL
> > Therefore: ROLF=ROFL
> >
> > PWNED²

Where's the problem there? Multipliclation is commutative....

Think he actually means you doing PWNEDxPWNED instead of PWNEDx2, which is what you shoulda done.

---

Everyone knows that million-to-one chances happen 9 times out of 10; indeed, it's a common requirement in fairy tales. If the human didn't have to overcome huge odds, what would be the point? Terry Pratchett - The Science Of Discworld

GPGSL S5 Race driver for IED.

can you maths dudes get a room already...?

---

RIP Jules, never to be forgotten. #KeepFightingMichael

No, I object to the notion that ROFL² equals RxOxFxL = RxOxFxL, which opens of up for RxOxLxF = RxOxFxL.

In a mathematical equation, no mathematician would take 4 constants and multiply them with each other, and interchange the order of the letters in multiplication, and at the same time keep that as a single expression, when no operation lets them interact with a different set of constants. Using ROFL as RxOxFxL when it never meets say STFU (SxTxFxU) or something similar is needless and redundant. No mathematician in his or her right mind would be so sloppy and let that stand. For ease of future operation and translucency, it would be collected in a single expression, say Z.

This was not done. Hence there is a significance in the order of the letters in ROFL (Z) and it is not the same as ROLF ( Y ). From this follows that;

RxOxLxF = RxOxFxL

would be the same as

Z = Y

which clearly is false. Hence;

ROLF = ROFL

is false.

So, there is no PWNED²... rather now we can say the original error i pointed out stands!

Q.E.D.

---

It's only after we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/20/2006 04:10PM by Morbid.

Have you heard of the equation with a letter that's manipulated to make 1 seemingly = 2? Via clever algebra it looks possible, but falls foul of not being able to divide by zero. This is similar, but I've sussed where he's gone wrong.

ROFL² can be expressed like this without falling foul of algebraic rules:

(RxOxFxL) x (RxOxFxL) (and variations on that theme provided there's an R, an O, an F and an L in each bracket).

So he didn't fall foul, but just needed to do this instead:

(ROFL)².

Think scientific calculators. They need the brackets when doing some square functions, otherwise they don't output what you'd expect.

And instead of this ROFL madness, try replacing them with numbers, 2, 4, 5, 6 for example, and then tell me you can't interchange 2x4x5x6 with 6x4x5x2 and any combination thereof. This off the back of a Maths AS level.

PWNED³!!!

---

Everyone knows that million-to-one chances happen 9 times out of 10; indeed, it's a common requirement in fairy tales. If the human didn't have to overcome huge odds, what would be the point? Terry Pratchett - The Science Of Discworld

GPGSL S5 Race driver for IED.





Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/20/2006 06:31PM by turkey_machine.

Your argument is very similar to other rhetorical examples with teaching value. This one I would call the peacock. The bird looks very impressive on initial display, but once you pluck it, there isn't much left.

Re-read your post, and then re-read mine, and you will see, that you point out things that you refute, that I never claimed. Thus you refute nothing.

I didn't talk about rules of algebra, but good and tidy practice, when you are communicating your calculations.

Also quite funny that you point out the necessity of putting the expression into brackets, and immediately run foul of it yourself with PWNED³.

Thus it looks like you correct what I said, but you don't. The (PWNED)³ is thus not achieved... in fact you didn't even achieve (PWNED).

And all the anal bickering aside, gary42 made a cocky hybris with PWNED², and I appeared (as anyone else could have done) as nemesis, and pointed out the typo in the calculations and we all know it.

---

It's only after we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything.