GPGSL S8 Round 14 -Monaco Grand Prix - The RD's Short Straw >> SHOCKING NEWS AT PAGE 204!!! <<
Posted by GPGSL
Rico Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thanks Sebastian, i appreciate that :-D Opening in
> a tab didnt work either, it simply said the link
> was broken.
> It was a great race for Minardi. A good haul of
> points here, and somehow Matteo did do what he
> said he would do, its unbeleivable :p
>
> @Mal being inactive, never expected that to
> happen.
Hi Rico, I can't understand why some have problems with the link and some don't. The link works fine for me.
5 x WCC - S5, S6, S7, S8, S10 | 4 x WDC - S5 Nick van der Voort ; S6, S7, S8 Ed Greenhalgh | 2 x WTC - S6 Stuart Ingers; S8 Andrei Sevastian
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thanks Sebastian, i appreciate that :-D Opening in
> a tab didnt work either, it simply said the link
> was broken.
> It was a great race for Minardi. A good haul of
> points here, and somehow Matteo did do what he
> said he would do, its unbeleivable :p
>
> @Mal being inactive, never expected that to
> happen.
Hi Rico, I can't understand why some have problems with the link and some don't. The link works fine for me.
5 x WCC - S5, S6, S7, S8, S10 | 4 x WDC - S5 Nick van der Voort ; S6, S7, S8 Ed Greenhalgh | 2 x WTC - S6 Stuart Ingers; S8 Andrei Sevastian
Stoopid Schreef:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rico Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Thanks Sebastian, i appreciate that :-D Opening
> in
> > a tab didnt work either, it simply said the
> link
> > was broken.
> > It was a great race for Minardi. A good haul of
> > points here, and somehow Matteo did do what he
> > said he would do, its unbeleivable :p
> >
> > @Mal being inactive, never expected that to
> > happen.
>
>
> Hi Rico, I can't understand why some have problems
> with the link and some don't. The link works fine
> for me.
Me neither ... It's also weird for me since I posted the forum spoiler and I can't open it myself unless I open it in a new tab
I Just made it with (spoiler=TITLE)TEXT(/spoiler)
Just use " [ ] " instead of " ( ) "
If you are racing, keep on racing and get some points!
GPG Super League S11 | Driver #41 | Team-manager | Snake Motorsports Racing Group | Next Race: Emmeloord - Flevoland GP | Constructors: 10th | Best Race Finish: 1st
GPG Super League Season 9 Testers Champion*
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rico Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Thanks Sebastian, i appreciate that :-D Opening
> in
> > a tab didnt work either, it simply said the
> link
> > was broken.
> > It was a great race for Minardi. A good haul of
> > points here, and somehow Matteo did do what he
> > said he would do, its unbeleivable :p
> >
> > @Mal being inactive, never expected that to
> > happen.
>
>
> Hi Rico, I can't understand why some have problems
> with the link and some don't. The link works fine
> for me.
Me neither ... It's also weird for me since I posted the forum spoiler and I can't open it myself unless I open it in a new tab
I Just made it with (spoiler=TITLE)TEXT(/spoiler)
Just use " [ ] " instead of " ( ) "
GPG Super League S11 | Driver #41 | Team-manager | Snake Motorsports Racing Group | Next Race: Emmeloord - Flevoland GP | Constructors: 10th | Best Race Finish: 1st
GPG Super League Season 9 Testers Champion*
JohnMaverick écrivait:
-------------------------------------------------------
> EricMoinet schrieb:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Not a good race for SCR.
But with no boost
> and
> > no boss, what can we do ?
> >
> >
> > c) Team bosses
> > ca)All team bosses are checked for activity.
> From
> > the commencement of Season 7, team owners that
> are
> > inactive will receive the following penalties.
> > First inactive penalty: a 10 point constructors
> > title reduction. Second inactive penalty: a 15
> > point constructors title reduction. Third
> inactive
> > penalty: Team forfeiture. The team will be
> passed
> > intact to the number 1 race driver for
> management
> > till the end of the season, whereupon it will
> then
> > be passed to the first on the team waiting
> list.
> >
> > cb) In the event of the team boss being removed
> > from the series, either by penalty or by any
> other
> > means, the GPGSL will pass the team management
> to
> > the first driver on that team for the remainder
> of
> > the season. At the close of the season, the
> team
> > slot will be allocated to the next person on
> the
> > team waiting list.
> >
> >
> > I'm not a big fan of this rule :
> > 1- it penalizes the whole team, even its active
> > members;
> > 2- in that case Mal got two penalties, one as a
> > team owner and another one as a driver. That
> makes
> > a lot.
> >
> > I think we should amend these rules for next
> > season as I feel it is not very fair for the
> team
> > members who are doing their best for being
> active,
> > and it's a little bit harsh for a driving team
> > owner who is being given two penalties at once.
>
>
> This rule has been established in this form to
> avoid penalizing active drivers for inactivity of
> their teamowner. The first idea had been to
> distract 10 points from the team perf. But THIS
> really would have penalized active drivers in this
> time. Hence why the team is only distracted points
> from the constructor's championship. This does not
> directly penalize active drivers in this team. But
> on the other hand inactive team owners have to be
> penalized in a way, or they would have superior
> rights to all the drivers, which can't be. Granted
> that in cases like Mal's, this leads to a double
> penalty. But only because Mal has a double-role,
> too and with that also double the responsibility
> to be active. He is not penalized twice as a team
> owner, but he is penalized once as a team owner,
> with a 10 point reduction from the constructor's
> championship table, and he is penalized once as a
> test driver for SMS, with a 10 point perf
> reduction. Simple as that.
>
> [...]
I understand your point of view and I agree that an inactive owner has to be penalized. However I think the way the league does it is a little bit harsh as you penalize the whole team and not only the team owner. What I mean by this is that we are all working very hard to make our team better, going every day at the factory to improve the car and try to get the best strategy for each race, and all this work is now going down only because of one missing person. Hence why I think we should find a better way to penalize the team owner and not the whole team IMO.
Not completely off topic : does someone have news of mortal the last days ? The last thing I've read from him was this enigmatic thread in GP3 forum.
-------------------------------------------------------
> EricMoinet schrieb:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Not a good race for SCR.
But with no boost> and
> > no boss, what can we do ?
> >
> >
> > c) Team bosses
> > ca)All team bosses are checked for activity.
> From
> > the commencement of Season 7, team owners that
> are
> > inactive will receive the following penalties.
> > First inactive penalty: a 10 point constructors
> > title reduction. Second inactive penalty: a 15
> > point constructors title reduction. Third
> inactive
> > penalty: Team forfeiture. The team will be
> passed
> > intact to the number 1 race driver for
> management
> > till the end of the season, whereupon it will
> then
> > be passed to the first on the team waiting
> list.
> >
> > cb) In the event of the team boss being removed
> > from the series, either by penalty or by any
> other
> > means, the GPGSL will pass the team management
> to
> > the first driver on that team for the remainder
> of
> > the season. At the close of the season, the
> team
> > slot will be allocated to the next person on
> the
> > team waiting list.
> >
> >
> > I'm not a big fan of this rule :
> > 1- it penalizes the whole team, even its active
> > members;
> > 2- in that case Mal got two penalties, one as a
> > team owner and another one as a driver. That
> makes
> > a lot.
> >
> > I think we should amend these rules for next
> > season as I feel it is not very fair for the
> team
> > members who are doing their best for being
> active,
> > and it's a little bit harsh for a driving team
> > owner who is being given two penalties at once.
>
>
> This rule has been established in this form to
> avoid penalizing active drivers for inactivity of
> their teamowner. The first idea had been to
> distract 10 points from the team perf. But THIS
> really would have penalized active drivers in this
> time. Hence why the team is only distracted points
> from the constructor's championship. This does not
> directly penalize active drivers in this team. But
> on the other hand inactive team owners have to be
> penalized in a way, or they would have superior
> rights to all the drivers, which can't be. Granted
> that in cases like Mal's, this leads to a double
> penalty. But only because Mal has a double-role,
> too and with that also double the responsibility
> to be active. He is not penalized twice as a team
> owner, but he is penalized once as a team owner,
> with a 10 point reduction from the constructor's
> championship table, and he is penalized once as a
> test driver for SMS, with a 10 point perf
> reduction. Simple as that.
>
> [...]
I understand your point of view and I agree that an inactive owner has to be penalized. However I think the way the league does it is a little bit harsh as you penalize the whole team and not only the team owner. What I mean by this is that we are all working very hard to make our team better, going every day at the factory to improve the car and try to get the best strategy for each race, and all this work is now going down only because of one missing person. Hence why I think we should find a better way to penalize the team owner and not the whole team IMO.
Not completely off topic : does someone have news of mortal the last days ? The last thing I've read from him was this enigmatic thread in GP3 forum.
And how would you penalize a team owner who is not a driver at the same time? Since this has to be our reference, first of all. And also explain to me, please, how, in your opinion, a driver is penalized by the constructor's championship point reduction? I'd agree with you if there was a team perf reduction, but this isn't the case. It's simply a reduction of the championship points, the perfs stay untouched! So again, please display me how the other team members are penalized in this scenario and how the team 'is going down'? And make a suggestion of how else a team owner who isn't a driver could be penalized otherwise.
GPGSL : Team Owner of 'Maverick Track Performance' (MTP)
GPGSL : Team Owner of 'Maverick Track Performance' (MTP)
Nice work by the two Demon drivers. Didn't expect too much in Brazil, but got a half reasonable result for the two lads! Well done....
GPGSL Team Owner Debut - Melbourne, Season 8 - present
GPGSL Test Debut - Hungary, Season 4. GPGSL Race Debut - Adelaide, Season 5.
GPGSL Team Owner Debut - Melbourne, Season 8 - present
GPGSL Test Debut - Hungary, Season 4. GPGSL Race Debut - Adelaide, Season 5.
Expected more but 7th is very good. I had hopes for a podium or even a victory (I let myself dream, heh) but I just wasn't good enough. Stefan is still hunting for big points with his podium, so a big congratulations for him 
Overall, happy but not satisfied at all.
Stats: 139 Starts / 7 Wins / 9 Poles / 5 Fastest laps
Overall, happy but not satisfied at all.Stats: 139 Starts / 7 Wins / 9 Poles / 5 Fastest laps
Wow, I still can't believe that I've won my first race, even at my absolute favorite track. A big thanks to the team for the fantastic car. Finally we were able to show how fast it really is. Now it's party time, everyone come and join us at TSM, we'll put the word party to a completely new level 
The tables will be up on saturday, as atm I only have limited internet access.
@Stu: Could you please post a pic of the quali results & the fastest laps?
Some mods
F1 1996 | F1 2002 | F1 2007 | F1 2011 | F1 2013 | F1 2015 | F1 2018
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 03/21/2013 07:15PM by kedy89.
The tables will be up on saturday, as atm I only have limited internet access.
@Stu: Could you please post a pic of the quali results & the fastest laps?
Some mods
F1 1996 | F1 2002 | F1 2007 | F1 2011 | F1 2013 | F1 2015 | F1 2018
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 03/21/2013 07:15PM by kedy89.
Pleased I was able to at least make some progress in the race, but still not a good weekend for us MPR lads :/
Interested in managing an F1 team? Sign up for the Grandprixgames F1 Manager game here
Interested in managing an F1 team? Sign up for the Grandprixgames F1 Manager game here
Rico Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thanks Sebastian, i appreciate that :-D Opening in
> a tab didnt work either, it simply said the link
> was broken.
> It was a great race for Minardi. A good haul of
> points here, and somehow Matteo did do what he
> said he would do, its unbeleivable :p
>
> @Mal being inactive, never expected that to
> happen.
you should just reckon my greatness and let me be the head designer for your cars
My GPGSL Career
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thanks Sebastian, i appreciate that :-D Opening in
> a tab didnt work either, it simply said the link
> was broken.
> It was a great race for Minardi. A good haul of
> points here, and somehow Matteo did do what he
> said he would do, its unbeleivable :p
>
> @Mal being inactive, never expected that to
> happen.
you should just reckon my greatness and let me be the head designer for your cars
My GPGSL Career
senna9194 Schreef:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rico Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Thanks Sebastian, i appreciate that :-D Opening
> in
> > a tab didnt work either, it simply said the
> link
> > was broken.
> > It was a great race for Minardi. A good haul of
> > points here, and somehow Matteo did do what he
> > said he would do, its unbeleivable :p
> >
> > @Mal being inactive, never expected that to
> > happen.
>
> you should just reckon my greatness and let me be
> the head designer for your cars
I perfectly trust Maikel de Boer for designing the cars.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"If in doubt, Flat out."
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rico Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Thanks Sebastian, i appreciate that :-D Opening
> in
> > a tab didnt work either, it simply said the
> link
> > was broken.
> > It was a great race for Minardi. A good haul of
> > points here, and somehow Matteo did do what he
> > said he would do, its unbeleivable :p
> >
> > @Mal being inactive, never expected that to
> > happen.
>
> you should just reckon my greatness and let me be
> the head designer for your cars
I perfectly trust Maikel de Boer for designing the cars.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"If in doubt, Flat out."
Rico Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> senna9194 Schreef:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Rico Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Thanks Sebastian, i appreciate that :-D
> Opening
> > in
> > > a tab didnt work either, it simply said the
> > link
> > > was broken.
> > > It was a great race for Minardi. A good haul
> of
> > > points here, and somehow Matteo did do what
> he
> > > said he would do, its unbeleivable :p
> > >
> > > @Mal being inactive, never expected that to
> > > happen.
> >
> > you should just reckon my greatness and let me
> be
> > the head designer for your cars
>
> I perfectly trust Maikel de Boer for designing the
> cars.
when did this happen? D:
My GPGSL Career
-------------------------------------------------------
> senna9194 Schreef:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Rico Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Thanks Sebastian, i appreciate that :-D
> Opening
> > in
> > > a tab didnt work either, it simply said the
> > link
> > > was broken.
> > > It was a great race for Minardi. A good haul
> of
> > > points here, and somehow Matteo did do what
> he
> > > said he would do, its unbeleivable :p
> > >
> > > @Mal being inactive, never expected that to
> > > happen.
> >
> > you should just reckon my greatness and let me
> be
> > the head designer for your cars
>
> I perfectly trust Maikel de Boer for designing the
> cars.
when did this happen? D:
My GPGSL Career
Yeah!!!!!!! YES YES YES YES YES YES!!!!!!!
C'MOOOOOON!!!!!
wow... right... YEEEEEEEEEEEEES!!
What a bloody fantastic race! Literally SO over the moon with the win and fourth for Team Shadow. We took a huge gamble and used the last of our boost here but it paid off! Pulling back from our worst start to a season ever, I am so happy to see our name back on top.
Well done Tobias, you deserve this result after investing so much time in the tester series and then coming to a surprisingly noncompetitive car in the TSM. Thank you so much for sticking with us matey and may it be the first of many for you.
Ruben, what a guy you are, you've really had the most unlucky season of anyone so far and you should be fighting for the lead in the championship following your performances last year. Take this result and build on it!
Thanks to all for running this round of the GPGSL - it's rounds like these that make you realise how great it is!
C'MOOOOOON!!!!!
wow... right... YEEEEEEEEEEEEES!!
What a bloody fantastic race! Literally SO over the moon with the win and fourth for Team Shadow. We took a huge gamble and used the last of our boost here but it paid off! Pulling back from our worst start to a season ever, I am so happy to see our name back on top.
Well done Tobias, you deserve this result after investing so much time in the tester series and then coming to a surprisingly noncompetitive car in the TSM. Thank you so much for sticking with us matey and may it be the first of many for you.
Ruben, what a guy you are, you've really had the most unlucky season of anyone so far and you should be fighting for the lead in the championship following your performances last year. Take this result and build on it!
Thanks to all for running this round of the GPGSL - it's rounds like these that make you realise how great it is!
With Kederer's win, that makes it 8 different winners, and 7 different winning constructors. I think there is a strong chance of having a 9th different winner at Spa.
With Kederer's win, that makes it 8 different winners, and 7 different winning constructors. I think there is a strong chance of having a 9th different winner at Spa.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.