Morbid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Please point out to me, where I say that Hamilton
> was not at fault? Please point out to me, where I
> said Massa was at fault? Surely, you can't because
> what I said was:
>
no m8, i wasn't directing my comments to you, actually the first think i tought when they penalised Hamilton was that it was a racing incident and it could've been passed as that.. but if they really wanted to penalise someone would have to be Hamilton... it was unfurtonate for Felipe, but is common sense Hamilton doesn't want to break his wing on purpose regardless of who's in front
but yeah like i said i guess the stewarts argue that Hamilton caused a colision and compromised Felipe's race, whereas Hamilton "got away" with it
but yeah regardless of the penalty, Massa was going to be furious anyway, and Hamilton was going to recieve criticism
> Furthermore, Perez (yes the mexican) had 3
> collisions in this race.
not arguing that at all
> Webber did a carbon copy
> of the Massa/Hamilton accident to Glock in Turn 22
> in FP1. He categorized that as "a small incident",
> even though it had the exact same outcome
> (puncture/broken wing) at an even faster speed. I
> don't see anyone going nuts over that.
it was in a competitive environement, but not under racing circumstances... they where not racing for positions
> I don't see Glock
> pushing Webber around in an agitated state in
> front of the press, claiming that he is dangerous
> and unable to think.
it's a normal reaction from latin drivers, they tend to be more explosive, we see it all the time with Alonso, Montoya, Fisichella, Barrichello... nothing new to me, not getting dramatic over that
> Get some perspective.
don't know what makes you think i got the wrong one, the whole point of this is sharing opinions and discussing them, not impossing one over the others