Morbid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You really need to learn how to read.
No, YOU need to learn how to read. And once you have, I suggest you learn how to debate maturely and intelligently.
Morbid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> First you bust me for being anti-red bull, because
> they do well. I show you, that cannot be true,
> because I said nice things about Vettel.
You're full of sh*t.
FYI, Vettel is the driver, RedBull is the team. "Saying nice things about Vettel" does nothing to show you're not anti-RedBull.
My point(Which you managed to COMPLETELY avoid addressing) was that you had originally seemed to be saying "Webber is saying something different, therefore Horner is full of bullshit". I pointed out the flaw in your argument, and you've only dug a deeper hole for yourself since.
So yeah, I did bust you there.
Morbid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Then you
> say I am anti-Horner because I am pro Webber. Now
> I busted you for that.
You never busted me for anything son, and as long as you're twisting my words and talking bollocks like this, you never will either. I make that 2-0...
Morbid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Do you care for a third round, or have you had
> enough?
Have I had enough of what? Watching you disappear up your own arse? No way!
I care for as many "rounds" as it takes before you realise that you're losing this argument rather badly and finally admit defeat and shut up. Your delusion of grandeur is positively hilarious, considering that with the logic you've shown here, YOU are the one bringing a banana to a gunfight.
So go on, humiliate yourself some more if you want?
DaveEllis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> When Webber n00bed up in traffic and drove into
> the back of Lewis during a battle. All of the
> examples I gave were situations where Red Bull
> drivers screwed up in traffic. Something that
> everybody loves to make a massive deal out of.
> Then when Horner plays it safe, not to have an
> accident, suddenly they are all perfect and don't
> have accidents. So it's damned if you do and
> damned if you don't. You could say you've praised
> Vettel this year, but you only did when he passed
> 5 cars in a lap and gave you no choice. You spent
> the rest of the year saying he can't race. Now
> Horner tells them to calm down and don't have a
> chance for a crash, and suddenly he's the bad guy.
> What?
The exact point I was trying to make, only worded more nicely. +1
And yeah, Williams were notable for their use of team orders in the early 90s - worst in 1993, but also in '92, the best example being Magny Cours. It was what first made me aware of how team orders worked in F1.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/01/2015 03:08AM by EC83.