Canadian GP ***Spoilers***

Posted by chet 
Re: Canadian GP ***Spoilers***
Date: June 13, 2011 04:05PM
Posted by: nvooght
To be honest Massa was unlucky in his incident, but those things happen sometimes when its wet and dry on the track.

___________________________________________________________________
Waiting for March.
Re: Canadian GP ***Spoilers***
Date: June 13, 2011 04:17PM
Posted by: EC83
Morbid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As far as I know, all this cursing, swearing,
> blaming and hand waving at slower cars, is the
> invention of Senna. Before him, other drivers
> understood that slower cars had a right to race
> too.

Watch Watkins Glen 1980 alone, specifically Reutemann v Piquet. You'll see Reutemann "doing a Senna" and gesticulating at Piquet to get out of his way when they were racing for position and all Piquet was doing "wrong" was defending the apexes of corners.
My point is that other drivers did this long before Senna; in fact he probably just observed others and decided to take it a bit further.



Re: Canadian GP ***Spoilers***
Date: June 13, 2011 04:22PM
Posted by: Nickv
nvooght Schreef:
-------------------------------------------------------
> To be honest Massa was unlucky in his incident,
> but those things happen sometimes when its wet and
> dry on the track.


He drove on slicks on a soaking wet part of the track. That's not unlucky. He was lucky that he didn't smash his entire car to pieces.

I wonder if this race has given some more confidence to Schumacher. He seemed to have lost the fire a bit for the last few races, especially after Turkey. Maybe this was the little step up he needed.
Re: Canadian GP ***Spoilers***
Date: June 13, 2011 04:31PM
Posted by: DaveEllis
Karthikeyan had also just come out of the pits, and his unusual explanation for his lack of pace was that he didn’t know he had been given slicks, and had thus deliberately driven on the wet line…

“For whatever reason I didn’t get a call saying we were going to go on slicks, so in my mind I thought I was still on intermediates,” said the Indian. “And when I came out of the pits I realised that they were slicks, but it was too late because I was on the wet line and the car was sliding a lot.”


o_O

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com
Re: Canadian GP ***Spoilers***
Date: June 13, 2011 05:24PM
Posted by: Morbid
EC83 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Watch Watkins Glen 1980 alone, specifically
> Reutemann v Piquet. You'll see Reutemann "doing a
> Senna" and gesticulating at Piquet to get out of
> his way when they were racing for position and all
> Piquet was doing "wrong" was defending the apexes
> of corners.
> My point is that other drivers did this long
> before Senna; in fact he probably just observed
> others and decided to take it a bit further.

There is a vast difference between single incidents and a standard operating procedure.



It's only after we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 06/13/2011 05:25PM by Morbid.
Re: Canadian GP ***Spoilers***
Date: June 13, 2011 06:00PM
Posted by: danm
Karthikeyan had also just come out of the paddock, and his unusual explanation for his lack of pace this season was that he didn’t know he had been given an F1 car, and had thus deliberately driven at the national speed limit of 30mph in lit street zones…

'For whatever reason I didn’t get a call saying I was going to go drive for HRT this year, so in my mind I thought I was still on the way to Tesco in my wife's Ford Escort,” said the Indian. “And when I came out of the pits I realised that the car had no indicators, but it was too late because I was on the main road and had forgotten my shopping list'


Jenson drives it like he owns it; Lewis drives it like he stole it
Re: Canadian GP ***Spoilers***
Date: June 13, 2011 09:06PM
Posted by: Slash
too many buttons on my wheel, too many buttons on my wheel



maybe he pitted, felt the conditions on the track where improving, but given the fact he's not in a good team, he figured they can't make smart desicions... "they must've put me on wets still.. they must've, i'm not even going to look at them"
Re: Canadian GP ***Spoilers***
Date: June 13, 2011 09:52PM
Posted by: SchueyFan
DaveEllis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As for Massas accident, I don't really see what
> the HRT did wrong. Massa just lost it on slicks on
> a wet part of the track, and given Massas history
> of hilarity in wet conditions, I don't see why
> anyone is surprised by that. But it should also be
> considered that the HRTs were outside the 107% of
> the pole time, and only the big teams holding back
> in Q1 is keeping them in the race. We have cars
> which are the slowest in F1 for over a decade, and
> they are only being allowed to race because other
> teams hold back because of the nature of the
> current qualifying. So there is an argument to be
> made that HRT are too slow and shouldn't be there
> anyway. Not that it excuses Massa from another
> moment of stupidity.

Well Karthikeyan didn't break any rules, but lapped cars probably should give up the racing line in that situation. I think Massa also underestimated just how slow Narain's exit to the corner was, although I'd like to see his onboard footage to see if he actually braked to let Massa by or not.


flat tyre Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fun fact - the last 8 sessions have all been red
> flagged. A record?

If you don't include Montreal qualifying ;)





X (@ed24f1)
Re: Canadian GP ***Spoilers***
Date: June 13, 2011 10:59PM
Posted by: chet
Vader Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Slash Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Vader Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > chet Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > That was..special. Right now, for me that
> win
> > > > means as much as his whole wdc! That meant
> a
> > > lot
> > > > to me! More tomorrow when I'm at my
> computer
> > > > though! Button was class. That win > all
> his,
> > > and
> > > > damon hills wins, jv's wins, and juan
> pablos
> > > > poles, combined!
> > >
> > > A win handed to him by several SCs and a
> > mistake
> > > by Vettel.
> >
> > lmao, a mistake because he was so comfortable
> that
> > he lost concentration?, or was a mistake
> induced
> > by the pressure Jenson put on him?
> >
>
> A mistake due to driving at the limit for so long.
> It happens to everyone sooner or later. Usually no
> big deal, in this race decisive.

Saftey cars are a part of racing. Mistakes are a part of racing and they were part of this race.

Vettel made a mistake under pressure Button put on him. It was that simple. Vettel's mistake was not a brain fade. Vettel's mistake was a mistake induced by the fact he had drive quick! He got flustered and you saw the result.

The reason I appreciated that win so much was because it was a race Button was his usual measured self and Lewis-type aggressive when he needed to be. There were stages when it was wet when he should have maybe been more aggressive for position, but other than that his race was perfect.

Can you say the same for Vettel?

He had pressure for about 2 laps from Massa. After that he scampered off. However, he made the mistake of not driving hard enough on slicks early enough. He was arrogant. He assumed the win was in the bag. I mean, who would doubt him? He had Webber, Schumacher in a shite car, and the always cautious Button behind. He probably thought he had an easy ride because it was neither Lewis or Alonso. Fact is, he vastly under-estimated Button and that was his mistake.

Sure, without the saftey car Button would not have been in that position but there was a safety car and that is that. It was what it was and Vettel did not make the most of his opportunity because he got cocky. You saw that in his face afterwards. The race was his! Still, he's still young and he's been due a mistake. He will learn, and thats what matters. Button showed pure class yesterday. A class only experience will gain you.

Button surprised even myself with his drive. I said it last time, he along with Vettel, Lewis and Alonso are on another level this season. They are simply amazing. Button the last 3 races has been a pleasure to watch. Ive got so much more out of it than his 2009 races. Why? Because this time he is against far more formidable opponents. Vettel is a stronger driver, a WDC, Lewis is better than ever, Alonso is driving amazing yet Button is there with them. Maybe still not on their level but he's not as far as he was last year.

The Button and Mclaren relationship is amazing. The Button-Lewis relationship just as amazing.

Recently I've come to accept Button is not a great who will be remembered by everyone. Ive accepted there are a number of quicker, maybe better drivers out there right now and I certainly don't have the same opinion of him I once used to where to me, he was God who could do no wrong. But then he goes and does something like this and makes me re-think him again. Yesterday he displayed everything I've ever wanted him to show as a driver and more. He has times like Oz where he got flustered and made a meal of the incident (in hindsight I accept that penalty - had my fanboy hat on at the time) but he wont make the same mistake twice. That's something Lewis needs to learn.

Button IS NOT a contender of the title IMO but expect more wins. He will not beat Vettel, Lewis or Alonso in the points at the end but if he's more than 20-25 points behind 2nd place (or Lewis) i will be amazed. Button is a fly you will never shake off.






"Trulli was slowing down like he wanted to have a picnic" LOL
Re: Canadian GP ***Spoilers***
Date: June 13, 2011 11:23PM
Posted by: DaveEllis
but lapped cars probably should give up the racing line in that situation.

No. A lapped car should be predictable in it's movement.

Vettel's mistake was a mistake induced by the fact he had drive quick! He got flustered and you saw the result.

Might be reading a bit much into it. He wasn't the fastest in the race and he pushed beyond the limit in tricky conditions, rather than got flustered.

He was arrogant.

Ok, now you're getting into fanboy mode here. Arrogant? Seriously? No, it's called being conservative. As Jackie Stewart said, the best way to win a race is the slowest way possible, and Red Bull is a perfect example of that this year. Vettel has never ran off into the lead of *any* race, he has always managed the gap between the 5-10 second mark. It's managing the car, it's managing the gap, and it's making sure you aren't unnecessarily risking yourself or in Red Bulls case, the car. It's race craft, and Red Bull and Vettel have gotten damn good at it. But it won't work every time, and China and Montreal were examples. It isn't arrogant - it's a plan that the team sticks to every weekend, and the 60 point gap this season shows it's working.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com
Re: Canadian GP ***Spoilers***
Date: June 13, 2011 11:24PM
Posted by: gav
Quote
chet
He was arrogant. He assumed the win was in the bag.

Conversely, you could say he was measured - keeping a respectable gap to the cars behind without taking risks on a tricky surface.

To be fair, it would have worked - he was five corners from the finish and despite all our prayers for a grandstand finish, he wasn't realistically going to be overtaken by Button... and maybe that's what caught him out - he relaxed and took his eye off the ball?

Still, we're over-analysing. He's still relatively inexperienced compared to those chasing him and the track surface was treacherous off-line. He got caught out. It happens. He still managed to increase his points lead by two points.


Edit 2: It seems Dave and I are thinking alike on this one.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 06/13/2011 11:25PM by gav.
Re: Canadian GP ***Spoilers***
Date: June 13, 2011 11:26PM
Posted by: DaveEllis
To be fair, it would have worked - he was five corners from the finish and despite all our prayers for a grandstand finish, he wasn't realistically going to be overtaken by Button... and maybe that's what caught him out - he relaxed and took his eye off the ball?

I'm actually glad Vettel made the mistake, because I think DRS would have simply gifted Jenson the win. and I'd rather not have the racing spoiled by that.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com
Re: Canadian GP ***Spoilers***
Date: June 13, 2011 11:32PM
Posted by: gav
Nah, Button had made the gap up to Vettel, but he'd only made up 0.3 the previous lap or something. He wasn't going to be on Vettel's wing come the hairpin, as Webber and Button were on Schumacher, and the McLaren's DRS isn't fast enough in a straight-line to just overhaul a 0.5 second lead let alone a 1 second lead, and even if he'd got alongside Vettel, it's not like he could have just stuck it up the inside on slicks - he'd need to be clearly ahead before the braking point.

It would have made the next lap thrilling if there was one though.

I agree completely though. Once more, DRS was making the pass, not putting drivers into a position to pass. As in Turkey, it was ridiculous. The clearest example was on the last lap - Massa should never have been allowed to overtake Kobayashi - he didn't make that move, he just got up behind him, pressed a button and drove for the line. It wasn't an overtake, it was a calamity.

Edit: I wish I'd proof-read what I write.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 06/13/2011 11:33PM by gav.
Re: Canadian GP ***Spoilers***
Date: June 13, 2011 11:38PM
Posted by: chet
If it were Lewis behind instead of Button. Vettel would not have been silly enough to gap a slower Merc, and his team mate by 3 seconds. If it were Lewis you could be sure Vettel would have been on it.

The issue to me was tyre temperature. Button had it, Vettel on cruise mode didn't. He didn't have the confidence to push and find where the grip was, and once upto speed he went too far.

Even I thought Vettel had it in the bag. Once into second I expected Button to close, and follow the leader.

I seriously believe if Alonso or Lewis were the drivers behind Vettel would have been more alert, and probably won. Maybe the issue was he never had to push the entire race. He had an easy ride whereas Button was forced to push most the way. Maybe that was the mistake? The guy held of a raging Fernando at Singapore and Lewis at Barcelona. Realistically, Button would have been easy to hold off. As far as I've seen Vettel has never really considered Button a threat, and to a point I would agree. Vettel is a better driver in all areas whereas with Lewis and Fernando they are at least equal in all areas. If it were me I would have thought the same. Fact is Button has built a reputation for cruising and collecting, and whilst two of his rivals had retired, would he risk a run in with Vettel?

Either way I just feel Vettel got complacent. They say driving slower is often a quicker way to crash.

But as I say, he seems more able to learn from mistakes than Lewis. You will be sure he wont make the same mistake twice.

Still I guess it's a simple difference of opinion. Its just nice to know he can still make mistakes when it counts because we need a few more!!!!!

Also, I was going to add to my previous post. Vader, it seemed as if you were suggested the safety cars were lucky for Button, and they were. But you have to consider that I guess due to the regulation for the safety car, Vettel picked up free pitstops. I guess being due to regulation it isn't luck. Its more to do with chance I guess.






"Trulli was slowing down like he wanted to have a picnic" LOL
Re: Canadian GP ***Spoilers***
Date: June 13, 2011 11:44PM
Posted by: DaveEllis
No offence chet, but you're just making it up as you go along now. Tyre temperatures are an issue? No confidence to push? Got complacent? Sorry man, but that's just poor. He made a mistake whilst fighting from the lead. When others make mistakes none of these are issues - it was a mistake whilst fighting for the lead, nothing more. Just because he's made less mistakes than everyone else this season doesn't mean we should start over analysing it.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com
Re: Canadian GP ***Spoilers***
Date: June 13, 2011 11:46PM
Posted by: Slash
i taught i saw Kobayashi out of shape coming out of last corner, a bit like Webber when Button passed him..

i have no doubt Jenson would've passed Vettel with the DRS (of course).. the guy was flying and honesly i think he deserves all the credit he's given by Withmarsh.. the guy was 4th with 5 laps to go but the best of everything is that he looked convincing in every corner.. like he was driving with some unleashed fury thinking "@#$%& it i almost crash before, if i don't now i'll win"... he drove with the right menatlity at the right time.

i don't think we should count him off for the championship just yet... the funniest things is that Lewis does the talking, yet Jenson is the one who brings the resutls, he said he was aiming to win these last 2 races, yet Jenson almost won Monaco and did this one...

aout the safety car.. well somehow safety car didn't help him last race, it did yesterday, is how it always works, he still dod some good racing coming to the front.. i think he was the best guy yesterday, and justice was served, the best guy won.
Re: Canadian GP ***Spoilers***
Date: June 14, 2011 12:23AM
Posted by: chet
DaveEllis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No offence chet, but you're just making it up as
> you go along now. Tyre temperatures are an issue?
> No confidence to push? Got complacent? Sorry man,
> but that's just poor. He made a mistake whilst
> fighting from the lead. When others make mistakes
> none of these are issues - it was a mistake whilst
> fighting for the lead, nothing more. Just because
> he's made less mistakes than everyone else this
> season doesn't mean we should start over analysing
> it.


About the temperatures, Kravitz mentions it himself too. Fact is Button was driving 100% everylap on slicks. Vettel wasn't. The laptimes suggest he was too cautious, and it seemed to be it cost him when he needed to be aggressive.

[news.bbc.co.uk]

Disagree with the rest, but it's hard to disagree with ted, and he mentions it was what Horner said.

edit - [www.f1fanatic.co.uk]

wow at the pole positions! that is amazing for vettel. more poles than alonso and lewis yet they have had cars capable of championships/wins/poles for longer you could argue! amazing. the guy really is a qualifying specialist !






"Trulli was slowing down like he wanted to have a picnic" LOL



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/14/2011 12:43AM by chet.
Re: Canadian GP ***Spoilers***
Date: June 14, 2011 12:42AM
Posted by: DaveEllis
Vettel had done 2 laps around the same speed as Jenson (give or take 3 or 4 tenths). Pirellis take less than a lap to get up to temperature. If they were low in temperature after 2 laps of being 4 tenths off of Buttons speed, then it stands to reason that every other car on the grid was driving on ice cold tyres, from being significantly lower speed than both of them.

In reality, the speed required to keep the tyre temperatures up in those conditions is not that high. The surface was dry and the tyres were soft. If Vettel had temperature issues, then everybody else was running on room temperature tyres.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com
Re: Canadian GP ***Spoilers***
Date: June 14, 2011 09:22AM
Posted by: SchueyFan
DaveEllis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No. A lapped car should be predictable in it's
> movement.

Yes, but if he had cleared off to the side of the track early enough, that would be fine as well. I think Narain actually tried to move at the last second, but it was too late due to the closing speeds. Narain was nowhere near the far left of the road.





I think that was the same lap that Karthikeyan was doing a Vettel at Turn 5 and was way off line. Considering his understandable lack of grip, I don't think he should have been wandering along on the racing line at slow speed, when he could have used his mirrors to see that Massa - and other cars were coming behind him.

It was a racing incident. Massa underestimated just how slow Karthikeyan was out of the corner, and Karthikeyan perhaps could've been more 'gentlemanly' considering the situation.

Slash Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> i taught i saw Kobayashi out of shape coming out
> of last corner, a bit like Webber when Button
> passed him..

Yes, Kobayashi was out of shape in the last corner, but obviously without the double DRS zone Massa wouldn't have been close enough in the first place









X (@ed24f1)




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/14/2011 09:23AM by SchueyFan.
Re: Canadian GP ***Spoilers***
Date: June 14, 2011 09:27AM
Posted by: marcl
I do not get why people say Vettel cracked under pressure. The guy has shown in Monaco and Spain that he does not crack. He made a simple driving error and paid for it, button made 3 errors in the race and won. He hit alonso needed a front wing and tyre and the safety car saved him. Yes the Lewis thing was 50/50 but Button was still invloved in 2 crashes that put 2 main rivals out.

I really do not get why people are being hard on Vettel and praising button.

Yes it was a good win as he had to pass loads of cars, but in reality at the start of the race he was all over the place just about keeping the car on the road. Then he switched to inters and the red flag saved him there.

It was a messy race by button and he only got his act together in the last 10 laps where he was fault less, in a car that was more set up for the conditions than vettel was.

Had they been able to move Alonso's car like on a normal track Button would been last!

Yes you make the most of every chance you get, but it was not a fault less drive like everyone is making it out to be. had it been Lewis or someothers that hit cars etc and won they would not be getting this praise at all.

Mclaren do seem to be building their cars stronger now though, maybe trying to make them Lewis proof lol.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/14/2011 10:24AM by marcl.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Maintainer: mortal, stephan | Design: stephan, Lo2k | Moderatoren: mortal, TomMK, Noog, stephan | Downloads: Lo2k | Supported by: Atlassian Experts Berlin | Forum Rules | Policy