Brawn GP (topic rename)

DaveEllis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Virgin isn't a title sponsor. Sidepod, engine
> cover, front wing and rear wing are still blank.

doesn't necessarily mean anything. AT&T only have 3 small logos on the headrest, top of engine cover and front wing, and they are still a title sponsor.

---

X (@ed24f1)

Well who knows, maybe at the next GP with the 2 week gap Virgin will have more sponsor positions on the car, and possibly a new livery to incorporate that

SchueyFan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> DaveEllis Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Virgin isn't a title sponsor. Sidepod, engine
> > cover, front wing and rear wing are still
> blank.
>
> doesn't necessarily mean anything. AT&T only have
> 3 small logos on the headrest, top of engine cover
> and front wing, and they are still a title
> sponsor.


It does mean something. Virgin is not a title sponsor. Brawn have said it too.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com

i know virgin aren't a title sponsor yet, but what i meant was that the amount of logos doesn't necessarily equate to whether a sponsor is a title sponsor or not.

---

X (@ed24f1)

Why are brawn 22 and 23? Shouldn't they be 20 and 21 being that there is only 20 cars on the grid?

Something to with them being a new entry, thus couldnt use Honda's numbers and the fact that Force India already had promotional stuff and merchandise with their team numbers on, meaning that Brawn had to use the following numbers.

_______________________________________________________________________

oh alright, thanks matt

---

"Arguing on the internet is like taking part in the Special Olympics...Even if you win you're still retarded"

I couldn't see the race yet, any more sponsors?

yes, MIG Investments - on the front wing endplates and nose

[en.f1-live.com]

---

X (@ed24f1)