Mosely admits to favouring ferrari....

Posted by Hologide 
Mosely admits to favouring ferrari....
Date: October 24, 2007 11:22PM
Posted by: Hologide
[www.crash.net]

make what you wish of this ;)
Re: Mosely admits to favouring ferrari....
Date: October 25, 2007 12:08AM
Posted by: Joe_Satriani
That's not really what he said...what he explained there actually makes sense IMO.
Re: Mosely admits to favouring ferrari....
Date: October 25, 2007 12:43AM
Posted by: RonnyF1
Joe_Satriani Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That's not really what he said...what he explained
> there actually makes sense IMO.

yup
Re: Mosely admits to favouring ferrari....
Date: October 25, 2007 01:55AM
Posted by: Jagdpanzer
Max's logic here seems correct to me....



"There are some pikeys there at Turn 10 putting tarmac down - what do you think of that?" - Martin Brundle
Re: Mosely admits to favouring ferrari....
Date: October 25, 2007 02:26AM
Posted by: Covfan
Confirms what we already knew tbh.
Re: Mosely admits to favouring ferrari....
Date: October 25, 2007 06:33AM
Posted by: Razorsedge
Yeah, especially this quote from the article......

“I use my neutrality with a huge amount of responsibility and stay in close contact with Ferrari to assure them that no British ‘mafia' or cartel tries to take advantage of them,” he stressed. “But should we find it necessary to impose our technical or sporting regulations, then Ferrari is treated like any other team. Should we find irregularities on a Ferrari – like the moveable floor after the Australian Grand Prix– it is removed and banned.”

;)

Re: Mosely admits to favouring ferrari....
Date: October 25, 2007 01:00PM
Posted by: IWE
But I always thought it wouldnt need a rocket-scientist to regognize "moving aero-component" if its made with f**king pivots and springs.. Thatkind parts were already against rules at those times. FIA should have taken all points away after that race.

Kimi, so, Massa Fernando Sebastian is faster than you. Can you confirm you understood that message?
Re: Mosely admits to favouring ferrari....
Date: October 25, 2007 03:03PM
Posted by: marcl
That says it all really. Banned after the race so why did they not loose points.
Re: Mosely admits to favouring ferrari....
Date: October 25, 2007 04:12PM
Posted by: Joe_Satriani
Because during the race it was not illegal?
Re: Mosely admits to favouring ferrari....
Date: October 26, 2007 11:14AM
Posted by: IWE
Joe_Satriani Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Because during the race it was not illegal?


It was 101% illegal.. But "FIA didnt have any test to prove it was illegal" even everybody was able to see how that part did work. There wasnt anything unclear about it. Its just so difficult to push it down by hand or with standing on it to prove what eyes can see and brains understands anyway.

So it "was NOT" illegal. FIA just asked friendly to get rid of it. For some reason BAR didnt get any friendly request to remove their illegal things from car before they had already 2 race ban..

Kimi, so, Massa Fernando Sebastian is faster than you. Can you confirm you understood that message?
Re: Mosely admits to favouring ferrari....
Date: October 27, 2007 04:09AM
Posted by: Slash
it's not what you see, it's what you can prove, if you can't prove it is ilegal, then it's not, deal with it, they could've proven for next race, but it was too late, Ferrari changed it
Re: Mosely admits to favouring ferrari....
Date: October 27, 2007 09:24AM
Posted by: Red_Bull
“ Should we find irregularities on a Ferrari – like the moveable floor after the Australian Grand Prix–it is removed and banned.”

So it damn well should be! I mean, come on. Max is acting like Ferrari are all innocent and naive. Yeah right...





Re: Mosely admits to favouring ferrari....
Date: October 27, 2007 10:44AM
Posted by: IWE
Slash Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> it's not what you see, it's what you can prove, if
> you can't prove it is ilegal, then it's not, deal
> with it, they could've proven for next race, but
> it was too late, Ferrari changed it


They cud have proved it just with pressing it down by fingers.. Yea I know that wouldnt have been "official way" to test it. Just stupid but true. lol

Anyway everybody knows that part was illegal and how fixing that crime would have effected to this year worldchampionship results...

Kimi, so, Massa Fernando Sebastian is faster than you. Can you confirm you understood that message?
Re: Mosely admits to favouring ferrari....
Date: October 27, 2007 11:11AM
Posted by: mikef1
You'd need more than fingers to prove that IWE, the Ferrari passed that standard test therefore it didn't move more than the allowed tolerance under the load specified by the original FIA rule.
I'm no Ferrari fan but they just found a loop hole in the rule, something all clever designers try to achieve to gain extra performance. Still glad they got found out as it was not safe imo.
Also remember that according to reports, it wasn't just Ferrari who had to change their floor in the end.
Re: Mosely admits to favouring ferrari....
Date: October 27, 2007 03:36PM
Posted by: Muks_C
don't let that fact in your last sentence get in the way of a good Ferrari-bashing though, Mike.




RIP Jules, never to be forgotten. #KeepFightingMichael
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Maintainer: mortal, stephan | Design: stephan, Lo2k | Moderatoren: mortal, TomMK, Noog, stephan | Downloads: Lo2k | Supported by: Atlassian Experts Berlin | Forum Rules | Policy