NeilPearson Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> rfactor has some serious flaws, most of which are
> found in F1C, they did fix alot of the crap from
> F1C, however still alot of flaws from it. For me
> the graphics are poor. running on full details it
> just looks wierd. for me, Nr2003 looks alot
> better. For me it wasnt worth it, but for alot of
> others they really enjoy the game, so you might
> like it.
I wouldn't say there were many serious flaws. It's better than it was. It still doesn't feel right for me, and I'll probably never race seriously on it.
That said, it is very flexible, and while there are hundreds of mods, and most of them are crap, it's more than worth it for the 5-10 excellent mods. If you're not sure which form of racing you want, then it's hard to go wrong with rFactor, to be honest.
I'll also disagree with Neil - I think the graphics are awesome on the mods... the textures on the base game are piss-poor, but it was never meant as a game to race out of the box, so I can't really hold that against them. The sense of immersion at the fictional Lienz track(s) is unreal - miles above anything I can remember seeing in any sim, not just motor-racing.