rFactor Screenies.

I don't know it's not as bad as they say. But not very nice thou

I do not say that he is perfect, that it is possible to be improved more very many, but is not myself horrible

OS: WinXP Professional 5.1 CPU: Intel Pentium D, 2.8 GHz Monitor: Packard Bell 17" Video: Ati HD4850 512MB DDR3 Sound: Sound Blaster Audigy Memory: 2GB DDR2 HD: 200 GB DirectX: 9.0c

ISIs Monaco barely even resembles reality losely, its absolutely terrible and will just be worse for convertion to rfactor.

many tracks are not resembled the reality and there are convert to the rfactor, in addition of which monaco not this finished

OS: WinXP Professional 5.1 CPU: Intel Pentium D, 2.8 GHz Monitor: Packard Bell 17" Video: Ati HD4850 512MB DDR3 Sound: Sound Blaster Audigy Memory: 2GB DDR2 HD: 200 GB DirectX: 9.0c

Most tracks are decently close to reality. F1C tracks, are not. They are pathetic. At least convert tracks which are decent instead of doing F1C tracks just for the "credit" of getting a track out.

Minimum work, poor result.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com

try and improve your english that might be a good start..
i dont convert stuff i make my own FYI





Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/05/2005 03:33PM by Stan.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com

is that imola?

Barcelona

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com

ok, where are u getting all these from.

I have not played it for a few weeks now have been waiting for an f1 update

the helmets are just so bad its untrue

OS: WinXP Professional 5.1 CPU: Intel Pentium D, 2.8 GHz Monitor: Packard Bell 17" Video: Ati HD4850 512MB DDR3 Sound: Sound Blaster Audigy Memory: 2GB DDR2 HD: 200 GB DirectX: 9.0c

Sidepods are a *bit* low-poly arent they?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com

could've at least fixed the broken verts before rendering :p

to do it you better

OS: WinXP Professional 5.1 CPU: Intel Pentium D, 2.8 GHz Monitor: Packard Bell 17" Video: Ati HD4850 512MB DDR3 Sound: Sound Blaster Audigy Memory: 2GB DDR2 HD: 200 GB DirectX: 9.0c

how about you using the tools at your disposal correctly? no? ok then.

e// don't challenge me, you'll lose.





Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/11/2005 08:58PM by six degrees.

If you mean we should go do better than dont worry, you'll be embaressed about that comment one day

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com

this badly, it does not have reflections

OS: WinXP Professional 5.1 CPU: Intel Pentium D, 2.8 GHz Monitor: Packard Bell 17" Video: Ati HD4850 512MB DDR3 Sound: Sound Blaster Audigy Memory: 2GB DDR2 HD: 200 GB DirectX: 9.0c

CoDeXiTo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> this badly, it does not have reflections
>

end of the world, isn't it?

I didn't do the render, I did the 3D model. Myself. Something you're unnaccustomed to.

you do not criticize so much if you do not like that they criticize to you

lol

OS: WinXP Professional 5.1 CPU: Intel Pentium D, 2.8 GHz Monitor: Packard Bell 17" Video: Ati HD4850 512MB DDR3 Sound: Sound Blaster Audigy Memory: 2GB DDR2 HD: 200 GB DirectX: 9.0c