Official disclosure of extra extraterrestrial life imminent
Posted by mortal
I believe there's a word for it. 
Edit: You know, this post really loses its impact being top of a new page...
K*bots UK, specialist providers of 'fun science' Curriculum Enhancement days for Primary and Secondary schools in Britain.
Please find us on [en.wikipedia.org] for more information.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/23/2009 08:19PM by Locke Cole.
Edit: You know, this post really loses its impact being top of a new page...
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/23/2009 08:19PM by Locke Cole.
to say water there's water on the moon might be misleading, have a look at that (especially the text below the picture 
):
[antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov]
used to be GPGSL's Nick Heidfeld
):[antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov]
used to be GPGSL's Nick Heidfeld
Slash schrieb:
-------------------------------------------------------
> h2o is water, even if it's just those 3 particles
true but most people would misunderstand it if you just say there's water on the moon. it's a good headline but the reality is much more boring than this line suggests. that's my objection, not the fact itself.
> 1 liter of water, could be 10000 days of oxygen
> for 1 person
i guess this is a guess
i doubt that the water on the moon is of any use as there's too much work needed to get it. interesting to know though.
used to be GPGSL's Nick Heidfeld
-------------------------------------------------------
> h2o is water, even if it's just those 3 particles
true but most people would misunderstand it if you just say there's water on the moon. it's a good headline but the reality is much more boring than this line suggests. that's my objection, not the fact itself.
> 1 liter of water, could be 10000 days of oxygen
> for 1 person
i guess this is a guess
i doubt that the water on the moon is of any use as there's too much work needed to get it. interesting to know though.
used to be GPGSL's Nick Heidfeld
DaveEllis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Water on the moon; The Indian Chandra mission
> proved that water exists.
>
> Really? Is that why the top search result for it
> is actually this thread? In fact, even if you play
> around with the words for the search, you find no
> site that would be worth mentioning.
You spelt it wrong.
Chandrayaan 1 was the craft.
[en.wikipedia.org]
Everyone knows that million-to-one chances happen 9 times out of 10; indeed, it's a common requirement in fairy tales. If the human didn't have to overcome huge odds, what would be the point? Terry Pratchett - The Science Of Discworld
GPGSL S5 Race driver for IED.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Water on the moon; The Indian Chandra mission
> proved that water exists.
>
> Really? Is that why the top search result for it
> is actually this thread? In fact, even if you play
> around with the words for the search, you find no
> site that would be worth mentioning.
You spelt it wrong.
Chandrayaan 1 was the craft.
[en.wikipedia.org]
Everyone knows that million-to-one chances happen 9 times out of 10; indeed, it's a common requirement in fairy tales. If the human didn't have to overcome huge odds, what would be the point? Terry Pratchett - The Science Of Discworld
GPGSL S5 Race driver for IED.
Check this: [divinecosmos.com]
NASA's Moon-Smashing Mission
Date:10-16-09
Host:George Noory
Guests:Richard C. Hoagland, Open Lines
During the first half of the program, George spoke with Coast to Coast AM science advisor Richard C. Hoagland about NASA's recent moon-smashing mission. The Lunar CRater Observation and Sensing Satellite, or LCROSS, sent two probes crashing into the Moon's surface last Friday morning, looking for signs of water (see video). Scientists and lay spectators expecting to see the much-hyped impact event were let down when it appeared nothing had happened. The biggest observatories on the planet and even Hubble saw nothing, Hoagland said.
"There was and is a hidden agenda around this mission," he suggested. According to Hoagland, LCROSS is part of a carefully constructed campaign to prepare the populace for imminent disclosure. The President of the United States will soon announce that scientists have discovered ruins on the moon, he added. Nobody saw the LCROSS debris plume because the probes struck a building which swallowed the effects of the explosion, he continued. Hoagland outlined some of the evidence that led him to this conclusion, and announced that the information would be available in a forthcoming paper on this website, [www.enterprisemission.com]
Hoagland also commented on an NBC special about the symbology in Dan Brown's new book, the recent Balloon Boy saga, an upcoming 2012 show on the SyFy channel, and mass consciousness and the Princeton EGGs. These events are part of a cascade of "synchronicities that are driven by this increase in the background physics," he explained, noting that we can expect to see more leading up to the pivotal 2012 date. "There is something big coming," Hoagland added.
[www.mediafire.com] Some say you should click it, you know you want to.
[www.gp4central.com] <----GP4 CentralEdited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/26/2009 02:55AM by mortal.
Richard Hoagland is a 'science advisor'!? Since when?
I guess since he's been on Coast to Coast. That's what it says, science adviser to Coast to Coast AM.
[www.mediafire.com] Some say you should click it, you know you want to. [www.gp4central.com] <----GP4 Central
[www.mediafire.com] Some say you should click it, you know you want to.
[www.gp4central.com] <----GP4 Central
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.