LoL @ site update news!

November 2013 - haha ha

---

It's only after we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything.

You mean you only just noticed.

---

[www.mediafire.com] Some say you should click it, you know you want to. [www.gp4central.com] <----GP4 Central

Morbid! That's not like you?

---

At this rate, even that's pushing it :p

I am not sure I get it. What is out of character EC83?

---

It's only after we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything.

Morbid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am not sure I get it. What is out of character
> EC83?

Well, you're just usually among the first to notice these things...

---

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/02/2009 05:42PM by EC83.

EC83 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Morbid Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I am not sure I get it. What is out of
> character
> > EC83?
>
> Well, you're just usually among the first to
> notice these things...

Absolutely no offense to Morbid, but no he ain't. He's normally amongst the later arrivers to threads.

---

Everyone knows that million-to-one chances happen 9 times out of 10; indeed, it's a common requirement in fairy tales. If the human didn't have to overcome huge odds, what would be the point? Terry Pratchett - The Science Of Discworld

GPGSL S5 Race driver for IED.

turkey_machine Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> EC83 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Morbid Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > I am not sure I get it. What is out of
> > character
> > > EC83?
> >
> > Well, you're just usually among the first to
> > notice these things...
>
> Absolutely no offense to Morbid, but no he ain't.
> He's normally amongst the later arrivers to
> threads.

It has nothing to do with "arriving" in threads. It is about attention to detail and observation. Of which, Morbid is top notch.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com

So I guess this has been changed a long time ago, and I am like the man walking into a room of F1 fanatics going; "Look Michael Schumacher isn't driving for Ferrari any more!"

---

It's only after we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything.

Are you the same person?

---

Everyone knows that million-to-one chances happen 9 times out of 10; indeed, it's a common requirement in fairy tales. If the human didn't have to overcome huge odds, what would be the point? Terry Pratchett - The Science Of Discworld

GPGSL S5 Race driver for IED.

No straight answers here it seems... tsk, tsk, tsk!

On the question you offer, "are you the same person", I would answer you, turkey_machine: "That really depends".

On a molecular level, certainly not: an almost uncountable number of molecules have been destroyed, exchanged and replaced. On the atomic level, it is even worse. On a cellular level, I am still not the same, since billions of cells have died and billions of new cells have taken their place.

If we go into the spiritual level, assuming you accept such notions, the question becomes really bizarre, because we have barely been able to define a spiritual me across the globe and the ages. Perhaps the perceived me is only the particularized form of the collective consciousness, and the perceived you is a different particularized form of the same collective consciousness. That would make me and you the same, albeit different in matter at this present moment. Upon death, that would be subject to change of course. Some spiritual traditions even reject the me altogether.

Am I recognizable to the average person? Well, I got my hair changed at the hair dresser the other day, so for some I guess yes, and others no. That depends on their level of awareness and perceptive faculties upon glancing my material figure.

What really makes the answer worth considering, is compared to WHEN am I the same person? People I met in public school would have a very hard time recognizing me, but those that have met me in the last 2 years probably could.

So... what kind of a question is that? Do you really wish a deep philosophical and spiritual debate? Do you think my account has been hi-jacked, just because I am not on the beat and I lost my sig? Maybe you think I am Massa in disguise, and I am confused because I got a big knock on my head. Or is this perhaps some sort of trick question, where on one hand you inject a witty remark and on the other offer some level of dismay at my lack of presence on these boards?

Answers please. I don't have all day. I am already decomposing!

---

It's only after we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything.

Good to have you back

What site update news?




The Flanker is gone.

Morbid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No straight answers here it seems... tsk, tsk,
> tsk!
>
> On the question you offer, "are you the same
> person", I would answer you, turkey_machine: "That
> really depends".
>
> On a molecular level, certainly not: an almost
> uncountable number of molecules have been
> destroyed, exchanged and replaced. On the atomic
> level, it is even worse. On a cellular level, I am
> still not the same, since billions of cells have
> died and billions of new cells have taken their
> place.
>
> If we go into the spiritual level, assuming you
> accept such notions, the question becomes really
> bizarre, because we have barely been able to
> define a spiritual me across the globe and the
> ages. Perhaps the perceived me is only the
> particularized form of the collective
> consciousness, and the perceived you is a
> different particularized form of the same
> collective consciousness. That would make me and
> you the same, albeit different in matter at this
> present moment. Upon death, that would be subject
> to change of course. Some spiritual traditions
> even reject the me altogether.
>
> Am I recognizable to the average person? Well, I
> got my hair changed at the hair dresser the other
> day, so for some I guess yes, and others no. That
> depends on their level of awareness and perceptive
> faculties upon glancing my material figure.
>
> What really makes the answer worth considering, is
> compared to WHEN am I the same person? People I
> met in public school would have a very hard time
> recognizing me, but those that have met me in the
> last 2 years probably could.
>
> So... what kind of a question is that? Do you
> really wish a deep philosophical and spiritual
> debate? Do you think my account has been
> hi-jacked, just because I am not on the beat and I
> lost my sig? Maybe you think I am Massa in
> disguise, and I am confused because I got a big
> knock on my head. Or is this perhaps some sort of
> trick question, where on one hand you inject a
> witty remark and on the other offer some level of
> dismay at my lack of presence on these boards?
>
> Answers please. I don't have all day. I am already
> decomposing!

No answers needed Lasse.

Wheel's still working fine BTW, thanks!

---

Everyone knows that million-to-one chances happen 9 times out of 10; indeed, it's a common requirement in fairy tales. If the human didn't have to overcome huge odds, what would be the point? Terry Pratchett - The Science Of Discworld

GPGSL S5 Race driver for IED.

no problem dude, glad to hear that

---

It's only after we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything.