Top Gear

Posted by Ianwoollam 
Re: Top Gear
Date: December 12, 2005 09:50PM
Posted by: DaveEllis
*cough* you had InMe (shite), Muse and Limp Bizkit in your sig when you were busy insulting my musical tastes.

Anyway, want a fight, take it somewhere else (or PM, dont really care). Let us grown ups talk please.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/12/2005 10:01PM by DaveEllis.
Re: Top Gear
Date: December 12, 2005 10:06PM
Posted by: matt3454
yep gota agree inme are shite, muse are class tho and limp bizkit are ok, but past it. You say your grown up, but one question meant with no offence is are you really above 14 and listen to HIM. Because round here i have never met anyone other than bam loving/him 12-14 year olds.

=P

_______________________________________________________________________

Re: Top Gear
Date: December 12, 2005 10:12PM
Posted by: DaveEllis
No offence taken, because that is where most people heard of HIM. But no, im 21 and had RazorBlade Romance before Bam had heard of HIM during the Deep Shadows And Brilliant Highlights years. You can see a million heartagrams walking about on skate kiddies who watched Jackass, but it doesnt mean they like the music, there just there for the image.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com
Re: Top Gear
Date: December 12, 2005 10:35PM
Posted by: madotter
There was me thinking this was a tread for Top Gear?????

Why dont people just understand that people has different tastes, if some 40 year old still wants to listen to the Spice Girls then so be it. What right does anyone have telling someone else that their music taste is wrong!?

anyway back to this ;) ;) ;)

Re: Top Gear
Date: December 12, 2005 10:58PM
Posted by: gav
Hmm... from that angle it kinda looks like a lady-bird.
Re: Top Gear
Date: December 12, 2005 11:00PM
Posted by: madotter
yeah, but tell me you dont want it now ;)
Re: Top Gear
Date: December 12, 2005 11:01PM
Posted by: gav
I'd stick it on Ebay tbh.
Re: Top Gear
Date: December 12, 2005 11:01PM
Posted by: Covfan
It looks slightly like that Ford Street Ka
Re: Top Gear
Date: December 12, 2005 11:07PM
Posted by: zeppelin101
Crap colour there I have to say, the one Clarkson was driving looked a lot better
Re: Top Gear
Date: December 12, 2005 11:09PM
Posted by: DaveEllis
I'd consider ebaying it, but like Clarkson, i wouldnt want to give up that power.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com
Re: Top Gear
Date: December 12, 2005 11:11PM
Posted by: chet
am i the only one who thinks thats ugly?








"Trulli was slowing down like he wanted to have a picnic" LOL
Re: Top Gear
Date: December 12, 2005 11:12PM
Posted by: DaveEllis
No. I think its ugly too. But its still stunning in a different way

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com
Re: Top Gear
Date: December 12, 2005 11:17PM
Posted by: zeppelin101
How the hell they managed to get 10 radiators in the bloody thing among the 4 turbo chargers is beyond me
Re: Top Gear
Date: December 12, 2005 11:57PM
Posted by: villarule
Ive always preffered the red version, though Jezza's was very cool.

I fact I think is great, and threw at a mate at college who said a Mclaren F1 is still better:

Both the Veyron and F1 can be at a standstill, the Veyron can let the F1 get to 120 before it starts moving and still will beat it to 200. I would have thought it'd be really heavy, but with acceleration like that, it cant be that heavy.

Also, how many rpm is the engine it, I missed it in the show.


Re: Top Gear
Date: December 12, 2005 11:59PM
Posted by: Muks_C
not sure on the rpm, but 0-60 = 2.5 seconds! holy moly!




RIP Jules, never to be forgotten. #KeepFightingMichael
Re: Top Gear
Date: December 13, 2005 12:13AM
Posted by: zeppelin101
Well if the rev-counter was telling the truth on the shots they kept showing of it, it's about 10,000 :P
Re: Top Gear
Date: December 13, 2005 12:16AM
Posted by: villarule
I was thinking that, but the bottom number was 1001, and it has 1001bhp, and Jezza could see how much hp he was using, so im guessing its a metre which shows how much horses you are using.


Re: Top Gear
Date: December 13, 2005 12:54AM
Posted by: DaveEllis
The counter was a render, and it was of the BHP

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com
Re: Top Gear
Date: December 13, 2005 09:49AM
Posted by: gav
That counter is in the car though I believe - there was another car in the recent past that had one too, but I've no idea what now.

I don't think it'll rev that much to be honest. It's full of turbo's, is around 8-litre IIRC, and has 16 cylinders... it doesn't need to rev high. It won't actually be able to. It'll have torque everywhere.

//edit: yup - limit is only 6,300rpm, and you get immense "neck wrenching" torque at as low as 2,000rpm apparently.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/13/2005 09:50AM by gav.
Re: Top Gear
Date: December 13, 2005 09:58AM
Posted by: -qwerty-
I thought it said 16.4 on the engine - though a 16.4 l engine is closer to a spitfire engine size I guess!

A rolls royce had an BHP- omenter too, iirc.

-----------------

She says brief things, her love’s a pony
My love’s subliminal
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Maintainer: mortal, stephan | Design: stephan, Lo2k | Moderatoren: mortal, TomMK, Noog, stephan | Downloads: Lo2k | Supported by: Atlassian Experts Berlin | Forum Rules | Policy