_tux_ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> with ati you need to use a motherboard with an ati
> chipset
Well you have to use an nForce chipset with SLi of course, so that's pretty null and void
I read a review of the latest ATi chipset on a board a few weeks ago, and the only places it yielded to nV was in USB transfers and no built-in hardware firewall. They really are quite impressive, and are better overclockers, somewhat unbelievably.
I'm an nV chipset user through and through. I've used an nV motherboard since my 1800+, and they've been great. But I want ATi to do well. I want nV to have a competitor.
If ATi produce a better chipset than nV and motherboard vendors jump onboard, then why would you want nV? With each motherboard upgrade I do I evaluate the best there is, and purchase on that basis. I don't care if it's nV, ATi, Intel, SiS or VIA based. I don't use the nV hardware firewall (and their LAN drivers are are pretty poor anyway), though I appreciate the faster USB2 transfers for external hard drives.
What ATi are doing are no different to nV at all, and their debut in chipsets has been a lot more impressive than nVs was. If my next board was to be an ATi Crossfire one I could essentially get a 40% performance increase at the same time. How is that a bad thing?