So who likes there Conspiracy Theories then?
Posted by DaveEllis
noy oydea moytoy!
oym gowna harv me a shyer noy, cos oym very dortoy.
(I heard that Nadine bird from Girls Aloud talking on Radio 1 about how she like to make herself feel good, she said "Oy have a noyce shyer"
RIP Jules, never to be forgotten. #KeepFightingMichael
oym gowna harv me a shyer noy, cos oym very dortoy.
(I heard that Nadine bird from Girls Aloud talking on Radio 1 about how she like to make herself feel good, she said "Oy have a noyce shyer"
RIP Jules, never to be forgotten. #KeepFightingMichael
wow, you spelt that correctly even though you've got your hands (or hand) full.
unless you already finished in the 2 minutes since my last post?
RIP Jules, never to be forgotten. #KeepFightingMichael
unless you already finished in the 2 minutes since my last post?
RIP Jules, never to be forgotten. #KeepFightingMichael
wow, you and me are on FIRE at the moment, its like forum tennis.
RIP Jules, never to be forgotten. #KeepFightingMichael
RIP Jules, never to be forgotten. #KeepFightingMichael
Well, using the recognised court evidence of a Hollywood film, I'd say yeah! Course he did. :/
()()
[]
[]
/snigger
edit damn that it reformats what you write
-----------------
She says brief things, her love’s a pony
My love’s subliminal
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/20/2006 09:51AM by -qwerty-.
what a great video about 9/11
wow, you and me are on FIRE at the moment, its like forum tennis.
Yeah, that was a really special moment there two nights ago, just me, you and a big empty forum.
Yeah, that was a really special moment there two nights ago, just me, you and a big empty forum.
bumpy bump bump
have a look at this, they reckon it was a controlled demolition of the World Trade Towers, and a 3rd WTC building too.
as much as i hate Bush and Co, i don't think they would have planned it. if they did, they are more evil than i could ever imagine humans to be.
RIP Jules, never to be forgotten. #KeepFightingMichael
have a look at this, they reckon it was a controlled demolition of the World Trade Towers, and a 3rd WTC building too.
as much as i hate Bush and Co, i don't think they would have planned it. if they did, they are more evil than i could ever imagine humans to be.
RIP Jules, never to be forgotten. #KeepFightingMichael
of all the questionable things about that day, the buildings going down so smoothly is near the top.
i think its common to have large buildings wired up just in case.
but even if they bought it down, it could've been safer that way than letting them topple...
____
Tony
i think its common to have large buildings wired up just in case.
but even if they bought it down, it could've been safer that way than letting them topple...
____
Tony
large buildings are wired up just in case? i never knew that. that's quite shocking.
RIP Jules, never to be forgotten. #KeepFightingMichael
RIP Jules, never to be forgotten. #KeepFightingMichael
all these theories are very angled.. they never really tell the whole story..
Muks_C Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> bumpy bump bump
>
> have a look at this, they reckon it was a
> controlled demolition of the World Trade Towers,
> and a 3rd WTC building too.
>
I think you don't need to be a physics ace to figure out what happens if you apply extreme pressure from above on a sealed hollow body. It will burst somewhere below the point of pressure. When the buildings starts falling together, air in gets compressed, builds up pressure and will eventually discharge whereever it finds a weak spot to do so. This is why the windows keep crashing way down and whyt looks like explosions on the wiggly videos.
Try this with a milk carton. hit it straightfrom above with a hammer and watch the milk burst out somewhere below the point of pressure. That's not a conspiracy, that's simply physics.
REHAB IS FOR QUITTERS
-------------------------------------------------------
> bumpy bump bump
>
> have a look at this, they reckon it was a
> controlled demolition of the World Trade Towers,
> and a 3rd WTC building too.
>
I think you don't need to be a physics ace to figure out what happens if you apply extreme pressure from above on a sealed hollow body. It will burst somewhere below the point of pressure. When the buildings starts falling together, air in gets compressed, builds up pressure and will eventually discharge whereever it finds a weak spot to do so. This is why the windows keep crashing way down and whyt looks like explosions on the wiggly videos.
Try this with a milk carton. hit it straightfrom above with a hammer and watch the milk burst out somewhere below the point of pressure. That's not a conspiracy, that's simply physics.
REHAB IS FOR QUITTERS
yeah i agree, i thought it was just the way the force from above made the lower windows blow out, but just offered it up for discussion, as they were trying to make a big deal of the "explosions" in the video.
RIP Jules, never to be forgotten. #KeepFightingMichael
RIP Jules, never to be forgotten. #KeepFightingMichael
That is backed up by the point that unlike most buildings of its size, the WTC buildings were not 1 central column supporting it, but 1 thin column in the center and 4 on the outside. So weak points from the building crumbling will be easily visible from the outside
The core is actually a lot thicker than what was widely reported. heres a bbc image of the core, which would make it seem very likely it could collapse, and under is a photo of the core which takes up a lot of floorspace.
[911research.wtc7.net]
try the milk carton trick again and see if you can get it to go down perfectly, or does it collapse irregurly?
i've no idea if those videos are real, but going with the windows popping in lower floors, then you'd expect to see a hell of a lot more explosions. but then you'd expect the same if it was wired up too.
and don't forget they were buuild to withstand impact from a 747.
Thats been explained from the way the strucutre was built.
of course. its all been explained many times in many ways, and it will still be being explained in a hundred years from now
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/28/2006 05:28PM by b-tone.
The core is actually a lot thicker than what was widely reported. heres a bbc image of the core, which would make it seem very likely it could collapse, and under is a photo of the core which takes up a lot of floorspace.
[911research.wtc7.net]
try the milk carton trick again and see if you can get it to go down perfectly, or does it collapse irregurly?
i've no idea if those videos are real, but going with the windows popping in lower floors, then you'd expect to see a hell of a lot more explosions. but then you'd expect the same if it was wired up too.
and don't forget they were buuild to withstand impact from a 747.
Thats been explained from the way the strucutre was built.
of course. its all been explained many times in many ways, and it will still be being explained in a hundred years from now
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/28/2006 05:28PM by b-tone.
about it being built to withstand a hit from a 747, they didn't factor in the fuel.
the hijacked planes were almost fully (Bin
) laden, something the designers didn't account for during design and construction. had the planes been empty of fuel, little or no fire would have spread, and in theory, they shouldn't have collapsed, they reckon.
RIP Jules, never to be forgotten. #KeepFightingMichael
the hijacked planes were almost fully (Bin
) laden, something the designers didn't account for during design and construction. had the planes been empty of fuel, little or no fire would have spread, and in theory, they shouldn't have collapsed, they reckon.RIP Jules, never to be forgotten. #KeepFightingMichael
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.