Öggo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>Q5: I already wrote this one too. He has done the first one and the rotated it!
I think that's not the point. Watch the lock carefully, compare it with Q2/Q3, didn't you see that they are different? Two edges was turned while others not. If you are a shaper, as you described, you will definatly copy the made one to generate the rest two? don't you think it's very strange to turn to edges, and this two edge are just the same as I turned?
Mapping the belt will cost about 30 minutes' work, we also have a reason to use others to save time.
and you can make a deep explore into the mapping , just minutes ago (while writing this reply) there' was a new discovery to support my doubt , look at this:
any words want to say? trying to map the same is nearly impossible in ZM coz you can't input the coordinates.
You can expriment with yourself , just import the two cars and map ferr_int and ferrari_3
Q1:
Why did the segments' height and the belt width fits well?
Q2:
I want to know the way Nicola make the belt straight ,and why didn't he make the other straight.
Q3:
If I remove the unstraight one away..
I want to know, why the mapping of the 2nd segment and 3rd segment has a same unflat?
A
Racing and
Rail fan.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/05/2007 01:53PM by Enzojz.