New Tracks - What you want

With much progress being made with track editing, I'm wondering what people want at this stage...



1. I'm a fussy kind of person, so I want full fancy tracks with all new objects and graphics. This includes all things such as pit buildings, grandstands, gravel traps, marshalls, trees, helicopters, grandstands with crowds, new horizon scene, banner ads, wet-weather reflections, ducks swimming on nice ponds, etc. Something with the level of detail as the default tracks, if not more.

2. I'm less fussy, but I want some level of detail, so basic tracks with basic details such as the odd grandstand, banner ads here and there and gravel traps where needed.

3. Don't care what it looks like, I just wanna drive new tracks damnit! :D




Please vote 1, 2 or 3 now :p





==================================
Huh?

#1 because I like everything to be hi-quality, re-res, hi-poly,.. Close as possible to perfection!

Kimi, so, Massa Fernando Sebastian is faster than you. Can you confirm you understood that message?

1!!!

:P

_________________________________

1

but for trees I don't need 2048x2048 texture

1

1


WilliamsF1 Supporters

AMD Athlon64 3400, 512mb Corsair XMS3200LL memory, Asus K8V Deluxe mobo, Powercolor Radeon X800 Pro VIVO, 160G Maxtor HD, Soundblaster Audigy, Windows XP SP2.

You know james it's slowly getting there. i'm making & like atm a track to be of the same quality as the better bog standard gp4 ones... all the objects like marshalls ,cranes , trees, helicopters, grandstands with crowds are not a problem to import and place but as i'm finding a lot of thought needs to be put on layout & placement ..... all the views covered no gaping holes in the horizons etc..... thanks to maverick a lot of people are now trying to develop tracks.. more info is needed though ,a fuller fatter complete track making tutorial you could say>..>>>>>>>>

[www.realgpx.com]

1 but my computer can't handle hi-res so #3 :D

1 too!!!

---

Oh yeh it has to be fun & challenging to drive too>>>>>>>> very important



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/12/2005 05:58PM by jimbob1.

I think im gonna try and make a diff, so ill say 1



AMD64 3400+ (running at 2,66ghz atm )DDR400 1gb(running at 433) Asus K8N-E Deluxe mobo, 6800ultra, Tagan tg-480w, Audigy 2Zs, Logitech Z-5500 speakers
Using X-aser Lanfire case with 5 fans inside cathodelights etc included aswell :P

2, because if we wait on 1 we will never get all the tracks we need. I'm thinking about circuits for the other mods, like 79, 86, 88, 99, etc. If we had a correct layout for the tracks used in those years,we could race a historic season. The eye candy could always come later....



"There are some pikeys there at Turn 10 putting tarmac down - what do you think of that?" - Martin Brundle

get the news out of the way first at 1, then the old ones i say.

www.footballsfinestgfx.co.uk

Jagdpanzer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 2, because if we wait on 1 we will never get all
> the tracks we need. I'm thinking about circuits
> for the other mods, like 79, 86, 88, 99, etc. If
> we had a correct layout for the tracks used in
> those years,we could race a historic season. The
> eye candy could always come later....
>
>


This is the kind of response I was hoping for.

All those who want perfection I fear will be waiting a long time. Track editing is becoming much easier, but it isn't that easy by a long shot.



==================================
Huh?

1 of course, very good idea !!!!

for me 1 & 2 keep in mind lower spec computers

1

__________________________



Help keep our forums tidy.

Use the search function...

1


________________________________________________________________________________________________ G0 Schumie, G00000000!!!!!! ···· Patrick

Definitely 1.
Eventualy 2 if people is promising to bring updates up to 1 class

this thread has the shortest answers i've ever seen

btw, 1 for me too

---

I'm against sigpics