F 91-642

Still in progress
I am not competing with Stan.
I should build this car anyway to learn my self how to made 3D modeling





Post Edited (03-05-04 12:53)

U/

looks nice, looks different to Stans, but glad you're not put off by that and your still going with it. Good work keep going

I will continue and finished this car. Just want it to be as right as possible.
I

U/

red x here :/
at least lemme see it :P

@ Stan

I have change server now...
And I move this pictures to this place at th same time





















Post Edited (03-01-04 13:14)

U/

It looks(dare I say it) even more accurate than Stan's version
Amazing, considering that you don't have much experience in modelling(as you say).




F1archives * Facebook * YouTube

looks great man.. but it looks kinda.. uhm.. chubby..

sure greg like u say

Stan TM? HAHA! funny..

Hehe, now, if you could only copy Alesi_Fan's sidepod edges(in the way they are curved), it'll be nigh on complete. Also, the suspension bulges on the nose or your model are just a bit to pronounced, compared to the real car.

1990:


1991:




Post Edited (03-01-04 21:11)


F1archives * Facebook * YouTube

Thanks

@Berger fan

I have made some modeling in 3d before, but that was about 4-5 years back.
It was some tutorials, simple shapes and an attempt to made a motorcycle.
(still not finished) So I decided to have another go at it. Thanks to GP4 and formula 1.
This is my first car I modeling.

I believe that I had all I needed to make this F1 but the more you look at things,
you will see small differences you did not see at first.
The 642 was used from start -91 and at Magny-Cours the 643 arrived as you know.

Do you know when they start used the

U/

The Ferrari that season was diff at every gp so u cant realy say when they used them or no

Ferrari used the more squared sidepod(on the older shape) from Phoenix, Interlagos and Imola. They also used it in Canada and Mexico.

@ Alesi_Fan: That's a superb painting! Did you give to Gerhard yourself?




F1archives * Facebook * YouTube

OK!

I will save the

U/

I have made some changes an a small progress forward.







Post Edited (03-05-04 13:15)

U/

Looking great!
two small things though:

1) The sidepod openings are a bit too far forward, and need to curve downwards.

2) The whole airbox and engine cover needs to be a (little) bit thinner.

other than that, it's almost perfect!




F1archives * Facebook * YouTube

it looking really good, it could be a tough choice when both these excellent ferraris are finished. but i would agree with berger_fan about the airbox/engine cover point. there is one of these cars in the ferrari garage in the town im living which i occasionally stare at and it seems to be a very slim, slight car whereas the model does appear maybe a little bulky.

keep up the good work.

j o n .





in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, in practice, there is.

OK!

I will try to change that.
My "blueprint" is for 641/2 so I work by feeling and pictures now.
About wing position, was it 5 cm lower and 10 cm forward compare to -90?
You tell Erix about on his Dallara. I guesses that goes for all car -91.
Thanks for the support



U/

Quote: About wing position, was it 5 cm lower and 10 cm forward compare to -90?
---------
Yes, they were, for all cars. 10cms narrower from the rear - the front stays the same.




F1archives * Facebook * YouTube