Ferrari + Marlboro = Death...

That Macca was the advertisement itself :D By the way if I were Montezemolo I'd put something like this on the cars.



But probably they wouldn't be blamed only because of the hidden trademark anyway.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 05/07/2010 12:26AM by DaiMOn.

Hell yeah, that would be just about perfect. :D

LMAO!

---

anyway, this looks even better that that... but it has the bar code... in the 90s only UK and Germany dont allowed to show tobbaco, and when this was there nobody said nothing

The laws are stricter now than they were in the 90s, which is why the iconic Marlboro board at the top of Hanger Straight disappeared.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com

DaveEllis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The laws are stricter now than they were in the
> 90s, which is why the iconic Marlboro board at the
> top of Hanger Straight disappeared.

I didn't know that board had any history, but it always was a bit ridiculous having non-tobacco cars, and then a Marlboro on-track ad.

---

X (@ed24f1)

The boards contract was in place long before the laws so used a loophole to get around it. When the laws were tightened, the board went.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com

Frantic Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> [www.ultimatecarpage.com]
> rrari-F1-2000_2.jpg
>
> that would look better

yes, here's a quick mock-up

I think the 2nd one does look better (although not as good as DaiMOn's suggestion above )

I doubt any legal challenge could rule a white box as a subliminal marlboro ad.

---

X (@ed24f1)

SchueyFan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Frantic Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> [www.ultimatecarpage.com]
>
> > rrari-F1-2000_2.jpg
> >
> > that would look better
>
> yes, here's a quick mock-up
> [img443.imageshack.us]
> rc20102a.jpg
> I think the 2nd one does look better (although not
> as good as DaiMOn's suggestion above )
>
> I doubt any legal challenge could rule a white box
> as a subliminal marlboro ad.


and funny enough they did the first

And as I predicted. Ferrari have nothing new for Monaco.

Yesterday at Monaco. No bar code necessary

Well..well. It seems Kimi is still in contract with Marlboro? :D:D

All this stuff about looking at a logo on a car and suddenly running out to the shop to buy smokes is stupid. Ferrari could write "Only cool people smoke" in giant letters all over the car and it would not make one bit of difference to the smoking habits of people. I mean if you so effected buy advertising you would be to poor to buy smokes after spending all your money of new fitness machines from the shopping network!

The Thunder from Downunder

now its getting ridiculous - people complaining about Marlboro track advertising in the Red Bull simulation laps of Monaco...

[smh.drive.com.au]

---

X (@ed24f1)

SchueyFan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> now its getting ridiculous - people complaining
> about Marlboro track advertising in the Red Bull
> simulation laps of Monaco...
>
> [smh.drive.com.au]
> ette-controversy-20100520-vg89.html?autostart=1

Yeah I noticed the Marlboro ads on the simulations I thought that the tracks were just off the internet and they where just there. Didn't know they were made by RBR.

The RBR tracks are off the net. Albert Park is a GP4 conversion as can be seen by the out dated wall positions.

RBR run rFactor Pro.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com

yes, i can't believe the spokeswoman claimed that RB made the tracks

---

X (@ed24f1)

Might be slightly unrelated to Marlboro, but Ferrari celebrates its 800th GP this weekend.