hi-res request

[news.bbc.co.uk]

Anyone?

Its an awesome picture! Thanks

---

"Trulli was slowing down like he wanted to have a picnic" LOL

[www.darrenheath.com]

photographers website?




LS's Tip of the week
ESSENTIAL OILS aren't essential unless you're an engine, a gearbox or a twat

Just so you know, his rates for prints start at £150, so unless you REALLY want it, find a sponsor.

[Website]

haha. I just saw that. nevermind. I will keep hunting

Also, I have caught on pretty slow but Flickr is an awesome place for F1 images!!!

---

"Trulli was slowing down like he wanted to have a picnic" LOL

It can be good. Are there any particularly good accounts you've found for F1 photos?

[Website]

[www.flickr.com]

Other than ive found myself losing alot of time (without realizing) just browsing.

---

"Trulli was slowing down like he wanted to have a picnic" LOL

If someone can remove the copyright ring, you can try this link or the picture below.

It's too small an image resolution to work with, sadly. Nevermind!

I gave it a shot.




Jenson drives it like he owns it; Lewis drives it like he stole it

Looked @ this blokes Web Page and some of his shots, but is it me or does he do a lot of 'Out of Focus' shots for dramatic effect.....

This one seems as though it's been post-processed to include some of the blur too. It was probably an out-of-focus shot to begin with (or more likely poorly panned), but with excellent composition and obviously at a good point in the race, so he added the radial blur around the outsides of the car to make it look as though it was shot at a super-slow shutter-speed. It looks post-processed as the rear of Massa's car and the front of Button's are softer than the rest of their cars and the lines of the grid-boxes at the top of the image (the left-side of the grid) - hence why I suspect a touch of radial blur has been used.

Don't get me wrong - I do my fair share of post processing myself (I'm actually doing some on a load of school portraits right now... I'm just taking a coffee break), and if it can rescue an image like this then that's fine, but I suspect at a decent desktop res (say 1680x1050 upwards) it would look a lot poorer due to the original image just being too blurred in the centre.