F1 doesn't need British GP - Ecclestone

Posted by madotter 
F1 doesn't need British GP - Ecclestone
Date: October 25, 2009 09:14AM
Posted by: madotter
Bernie Ecclestone insists he is prepared to scrub Britain's name from the 2010 calendar if Silverstone does not want to pay the going rate for its Formula One race.

With Donington's chances now all but over, it had been expected that the F1 chief executive might move to safeguard the British Grand Prix by reaching an alternate deal with the race's traditional venue.

But after a Silverstone spokesman said Ecclestone's current offer is not "commercially viable", the British billionaire hit back: "No one is forcing them to take it.

"This is business. We have offered them a deal," he told the Daily Express newspaper. Do we need a British Grand Prix? No."

Ecclestone disputes that Silverstone, scene of F1's very first world championship event in 1950, should enjoy protected status as one of the sport's 'traditional' venues.

"Italy is a traditional race because they have always raced at Monza," he argued. "Monaco is traditional as they have always had the same track.

"Britain and France have raced at three different circuits. They want a cut-price deal because it is traditional. That's not traditional to me. Britain is not protected," said Ecclestone.

"I would like a new plane because it's traditional as I have had one for 40 years but no one is offering me a cheap deal. That's not how it works."

Meanwhile, The Times newspaper reports that Donington's breach of contract may cost the circuit up to 15 million pounds sterling in cancellation fees.
Re: F1 doesn't need British GP - Ecclestone
Date: October 25, 2009 10:40AM
Posted by: mortal
Somehow I doubt the fans would be overly amused by that, what with having a British F1 champ n' all.


[www.mediafire.com] Some say you should click it, you know you want to. :-) [www.gp4central.com] <----GP4 Central
Re: F1 doesn't need British GP - Ecclestone
Date: October 25, 2009 11:08AM
Posted by: senna9194
madotter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bernie Ecclestone insists he is prepared to scrub
> Britain's name from the 2010 calendar if
> Silverstone does not want to pay the going rate
> for its Formula One race.
>
> With Donington's chances now all but over, it had
> been expected that the F1 chief executive might
> move to safeguard the British Grand Prix by
> reaching an alternate deal with the race's
> traditional venue.
>
> But after a Silverstone spokesman said
> Ecclestone's current offer is not "commercially
> viable", the British billionaire hit back: "No one
> is forcing them to take it.
>
> "This is business. We have offered them a deal,"
> he told the Daily Express newspaper. Do we need a
> British Grand Prix? No."
>
> Ecclestone disputes that Silverstone, scene of
> F1's very first world championship event in 1950,
> should enjoy protected status as one of the
> sport's 'traditional' venues.
>
> "Italy is a traditional race because they have
> always raced at Monza," he argued. "Monaco is
> traditional as they have always had the same
> track.
>
> "Britain and France have raced at three different
> circuits. They want a cut-price deal because it is
> traditional. That's not traditional to me. Britain
> is not protected," said Ecclestone.
>
> "I would like a new plane because it's traditional
> as I have had one for 40 years but no one is
> offering me a cheap deal. That's not how it
> works."
>
> Meanwhile, The Times newspaper reports that
> Donington's breach of contract may cost the
> circuit up to 15 million pounds sterling in
> cancellation fees.
>

Ecclestone musts remember that UK and France are traditional countries for f1 races.

I don't understand why he wants a different track layout for donington...



My GPGSL Career
Re: F1 doesn't need British GP - Ecclestone
Date: October 25, 2009 11:24AM
Posted by: harjinator
I think the current layout was too short, or was impossible to alter to FIA standards (run off areas etc).

_______________________________________________________

Team Japan Owner - GPGNC
Re: F1 doesn't need British GP - Ecclestone
Date: October 25, 2009 11:28AM
Posted by: Peat
I think Bernie is just outraged that, heaven forbid, the British Grand Prix actually turned a profit this year.



Re: F1 doesn't need British GP - Ecclestone
Date: October 25, 2009 12:04PM
Posted by: Willb
I HATE BERNIE, Why doesn't he just go away and leave our sport alone :@ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

__________________________



Help keep our forums tidy.

Use the search function...
Re: F1 doesn't need British GP - Ecclestone
Date: October 25, 2009 12:23PM
Posted by: Peat
SOrry to burst your bubble Willb, but it is his....



Re: F1 doesn't need British GP - Ecclestone
Date: October 25, 2009 12:53PM
Posted by: DaveEllis
I HATE BERNIE, Why doesn't he just go away and leave our sport alone :@ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Because if we didn't have Bernie then we wouldn't be watching it on our TVs. Go read up on him, it's actually quite impressive.

Silverstone hasn't kept up with modern times. Donington was nothing more than an hilarious attempt to capture the GP by a nutter who is no more competant at running an organisation than any one of us on this forum. F1 does not *need* a British GP, but it would be good to have one.

Maybe it's just me, but I don't care what country a GP is hosted in, as long as the circuit rocks. If Bahrain was as good as Spa, I'd love it.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com
Re: F1 doesn't need British GP - Ecclestone
Date: October 25, 2009 01:03PM
Posted by: senna9194
harjinator Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think the current layout was too short, or was
> impossible to alter to FIA standards (run off
> areas etc).

current layout is around 4km,just 300m shorter then hungaroring and interlagos(i don't say nothing of monaco because it's a city circuit)



My GPGSL Career
Re: F1 doesn't need British GP - Ecclestone
Date: October 25, 2009 01:07PM
Posted by: DaveEllis
hungaroring is lower speed, so the race lasts significalty longer. Donington would be quite high speed, so it'd be a short race. I'm sure there is a minimum circuit length, I just don't know it.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com
Re: F1 doesn't need British GP - Ecclestone
Date: October 25, 2009 01:08PM
Posted by: Nickv
DaveEllis schreef:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Silverstone hasn't kept up with modern times.
> Donington was nothing more than an hilarious
> attempt to capture the GP by a nutter who is no
> more competant at running an organisation than any
> one of us on this forum. F1 does not *need* a
> British GP, but it would be good to have one.


I agree. The fact that Bernie wants to leave is because Silverstone and Donington both can't supply the facilities needed. Bernie has been very kind to the British GP. If Britain loses its race, then it's not Bernies fault, it's the fault of the organizers.
Re: F1 doesn't need British GP - Ecclestone
Date: October 25, 2009 01:23PM
Posted by: DaveEllis
Just another point:

Ecclestone musts remember that UK and France are traditional countries for f1 races.

Everyone, and that includes teams, drivers and fans, were happy to be rid of the Magny Cours race. That event is proof that people don't particularly care about tradition. We weren't going to be happy at a sub-par circuit just for the sake of the French GP being a tradition. Similarly, teams/Bernie should not put up with Silverstone providing sub-par facilities simply for tradition.

We cannot have it both ways. We cannot cheer when the French GP is binned, then cry tradition when the British GP is binned. Tradition only counts for so much - it is about facilities and circuits now days.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com
Re: F1 doesn't need British GP - Ecclestone
Date: October 25, 2009 01:28PM
Posted by: DaveEllis
Donington photos:

[f1.gpupdate.net]

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com
Re: F1 doesn't need British GP - Ecclestone
Date: October 25, 2009 03:24PM
Posted by: turkey_machine
DaveEllis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> hungaroring is lower speed, so the race lasts
> significalty longer. Donington would be quite high
> speed, so it'd be a short race. I'm sure there is
> a minimum circuit length, I just don't know it.

Donington is/was 2.5 miles with the Melbourne loop extension. The problem there is that 16 years ago the FW15s were lapping at 1:10s in the dry. Todays F1 cars would possibly lap around 1 minute dead. I don't think there's a set minimum length, but 2.5 miles seems a logical one to have provided the circuit's slow enough. Otherwise, Singapore, Malaysia, Bahrain, Istanbul, Abu Dhabi, Valencia all follow the trend of having a circuit at least 3 miles long.



Everyone knows that million-to-one chances happen 9 times out of 10; indeed, it's a common requirement in fairy tales. If the human didn't have to overcome huge odds, what would be the point? Terry Pratchett - The Science Of Discworld

GPGSL S5 Race driver for IED.

Re: F1 doesn't need British GP - Ecclestone
Date: October 25, 2009 03:30PM
Posted by: Nickv
The minimum length is 4kms I think, whatever that may be in miles.
Re: F1 doesn't need British GP - Ecclestone
Date: October 25, 2009 04:06PM
Posted by: turkey_machine
2.5 miles is 4.023 kilometres. Monaco's the exception at 2.09 miles.



Everyone knows that million-to-one chances happen 9 times out of 10; indeed, it's a common requirement in fairy tales. If the human didn't have to overcome huge odds, what would be the point? Terry Pratchett - The Science Of Discworld

GPGSL S5 Race driver for IED.

Re: F1 doesn't need British GP - Ecclestone
Date: October 25, 2009 04:31PM
Posted by: Locke Cole
DaveEllis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Maybe it's just me, but I don't care what country
> a GP is hosted in, as long as the circuit rocks.
> If Bahrain was as good as Spa, I'd love it.


See, I don't care about a "British Grand Prix" per se, but I think Silverstone (the circuit) is one of the best tracks in the World, and as such it is a vital part of the F1 calendar. If they re-created the Silverstone layout in Korea, then we wouldn't need a British Grand Prix. But right now, we need Silverstone IMHO - and that means retaining the British race.



K*bots UK, specialist providers of 'fun science' Curriculum Enhancement days for Primary and Secondary schools in Britain.

Please find us on [en.wikipedia.org] for more information.
Re: F1 doesn't need British GP - Ecclestone
Date: October 25, 2009 08:03PM
Posted by: DaveEllis
I agree, to an extent. But you can't have an epic layout, and garages that don't have water tight roofs.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com
Re: F1 doesn't need British GP - Ecclestone
Date: October 25, 2009 09:43PM
Posted by: EC83
I think Bernie is just trying to look out for the sport. No country deserves to have a race on the F1 calendar, just because it always has in the past or has had an association with the sport in the past. It's more important for F1 to be at circuits which meet the criteria of a modern Grade 1 circuit in every respect.
Silverstone keeps lagging behind, and seems to keep needing kicks up the ass from Bernie in order to get its act together. In 2000 we had spectator car parks which resembled stages on Rally GB, and in 2003 we had an idiot managing to find his way onto the track during the race.


DaveEllis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Maybe it's just me, but I don't care what country
> a GP is hosted in, as long as the circuit rocks.
> If Bahrain was as good as Spa, I'd love it.

Not just you! Good racing on good tracks is what I want to see, I'm really not interested what country said tracks are in.



Re: F1 doesn't need British GP - Ecclestone
Date: October 25, 2009 10:55PM
Posted by: Damas
I was at Donnington a few weeks ago. It was the last day ever of using the circuit and there were some road bikes going around it(I was there for the launce of Objet's new 3D printer and set the fastest time of the day of the F1 Simulator ;)). It was pretty eiry thinking that the next day it would be ripped up. The profiling for the new downhill section featuring the tight hairpin was already done, just needed tarmacking. But I couldn't help but feel that it didn't look anywhere near what I'd expect it to, to say it's meant to be hosting a round of the F1 World Championships next year.

I have a few photo's but no idea how to post them up (sorry I'm old and a bit behind on this t'interweb stuff!! lol)
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Maintainer: mortal, stephan | Design: stephan, Lo2k | Moderatoren: mortal, TomMK, Noog, stephan | Downloads: Lo2k | Supported by: Atlassian Experts Berlin | Forum Rules | Policy