***Spoiler*** Timo Glock the case... ***Spoiler***
Posted by red 5
Timo glock the case of ultimate cowardice
You can not lose 20 seconds per lap. You just can not. Not even if your tyres were wooden. He backed up. He let him pass by. This is disgrace.
Furthermore, he had the chance to retaliate after what Lewis did to hom at Monza. Glock is coward, utter coward. What was he thinking, he had 1 corner to go. One corner. He should have defense his position. Coward.
If I were his boss I would show him the door immediately. And if he would start mentioning contract I would take the contract and would beat him up and would tell him to shav the contract you know where. He would probably sue me. But the joy of hitting him would be worth of every penny that I would have to pay him on behalf of amends.
You can not lose 20 seconds per lap. You just can not. Not even if your tyres were wooden. He backed up. He let him pass by. This is disgrace.
Furthermore, he had the chance to retaliate after what Lewis did to hom at Monza. Glock is coward, utter coward. What was he thinking, he had 1 corner to go. One corner. He should have defense his position. Coward.
If I were his boss I would show him the door immediately. And if he would start mentioning contract I would take the contract and would beat him up and would tell him to shav the contract you know where. He would probably sue me. But the joy of hitting him would be worth of every penny that I would have to pay him on behalf of amends.
red 5 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Timo glock the case of ultimate cowardice
>
> You can not lose 20 seconds per lap. You just can
> not. Not even if your tyres were wooden. He backed
> up. He let him pass by. This is disgrace.
> Furthermore, he had the chance to retaliate after
> what Lewis did to hom at Monza. Glock is coward,
> utter coward. What was he thinking, he had 1
> corner to go. One corner. He should have defense
> his position. Coward.
> If I were his boss I would show him the door
> immediately. And if he would start mentioning
> contract I would take the contract and would beat
> him up and would tell him to shav the contract you
> know where. He would probably sue me. But the joy
> of hitting him would be worth of every penny that
> I would have to pay him on behalf of amends.
Oh come on, did you hear what Vettel said? you of all people should know how big a differance tires make in F1. be a man and accpet the defeat
-------------------------------------------------------
> Timo glock the case of ultimate cowardice
>
> You can not lose 20 seconds per lap. You just can
> not. Not even if your tyres were wooden. He backed
> up. He let him pass by. This is disgrace.
> Furthermore, he had the chance to retaliate after
> what Lewis did to hom at Monza. Glock is coward,
> utter coward. What was he thinking, he had 1
> corner to go. One corner. He should have defense
> his position. Coward.
> If I were his boss I would show him the door
> immediately. And if he would start mentioning
> contract I would take the contract and would beat
> him up and would tell him to shav the contract you
> know where. He would probably sue me. But the joy
> of hitting him would be worth of every penny that
> I would have to pay him on behalf of amends.
Oh come on, did you hear what Vettel said? you of all people should know how big a differance tires make in F1. be a man and accpet the defeat
This thread is so unnecessary. You are too emotional to see things how they are. I also wanted Massa to win because he deserved it and I'm a fan of him...but you have to face the facts. Timo had absolutely no chance.
1) Without Glock having gambled to stay out on dry tryre we would never have seen this dramatic final. Glock was behind Lewis and normally he shoould also stop for intermediates. If so, Hamilton would have been on P4 and P5 after the stop...and then it doesn'z matter if Vettel passes Lewis because P5 is enough anyway for the win.
But Glock took some risk with keeping his dry tyres and that's why he was infront of them and made possible this epic last lap.
2) The rain got much heavier in the last lap so the difference between intermeditaes and dries got really big. Three laps to go I think Kubica was also on dries and he was much faster and overtook Hamilton and Vettel in Bico de Pato and the last corner and there also Vettel passed Hamilton. But two laps later it was very wet and Hamilton and Vettel passed Glock easily on dry tires.
3) Just look at how slowly Glock accelerated uphill when he was passed in the last corner...totally no grip. Seeing the laptimes he lost 5-6 seconds in intermediate 3...and that's only two turns...so no chance with dry tires under these conditions.
4) If he he had blocked Hamilton on the inside it would not have mattered because Hamilton would have overtaken hime just right after the turn when acceleratiing uphill (see 3) ). And Glock surely couldn't do the left kink befre the pits at full throttle on dry tires...remember what happend to Webber in 2003 at this section...and he had wet tyres...
5) Look at Trulli's laptime, who also was on dry tires. They are almost identical, Glock was even 0.2 or 0.3 seconds faster....do really thing there was some kind of conspiracy? That Trulli had to slow down just make it look that way? C'mon, that's nonsense.
You should analyse things from a certain distance and not driven by emotion...that never helps and keeps you neglecting the objective facts.
As said, I even Shouted happily 'Massa is champion' when I saw Hamilton still behind Vettel after Bico de Pato and I was shocked when they passed Glock...but I am objective enough to accept it.
Cheers
1) Without Glock having gambled to stay out on dry tryre we would never have seen this dramatic final. Glock was behind Lewis and normally he shoould also stop for intermediates. If so, Hamilton would have been on P4 and P5 after the stop...and then it doesn'z matter if Vettel passes Lewis because P5 is enough anyway for the win.
But Glock took some risk with keeping his dry tyres and that's why he was infront of them and made possible this epic last lap.
2) The rain got much heavier in the last lap so the difference between intermeditaes and dries got really big. Three laps to go I think Kubica was also on dries and he was much faster and overtook Hamilton and Vettel in Bico de Pato and the last corner and there also Vettel passed Hamilton. But two laps later it was very wet and Hamilton and Vettel passed Glock easily on dry tires.
3) Just look at how slowly Glock accelerated uphill when he was passed in the last corner...totally no grip. Seeing the laptimes he lost 5-6 seconds in intermediate 3...and that's only two turns...so no chance with dry tires under these conditions.
4) If he he had blocked Hamilton on the inside it would not have mattered because Hamilton would have overtaken hime just right after the turn when acceleratiing uphill (see 3) ). And Glock surely couldn't do the left kink befre the pits at full throttle on dry tires...remember what happend to Webber in 2003 at this section...and he had wet tyres...
5) Look at Trulli's laptime, who also was on dry tires. They are almost identical, Glock was even 0.2 or 0.3 seconds faster....do really thing there was some kind of conspiracy? That Trulli had to slow down just make it look that way? C'mon, that's nonsense.
You should analyse things from a certain distance and not driven by emotion...that never helps and keeps you neglecting the objective facts.
As said, I even Shouted happily 'Massa is champion' when I saw Hamilton still behind Vettel after Bico de Pato and I was shocked when they passed Glock...but I am objective enough to accept it.
Cheers
Re: ***Spoiler*** Timo Glock the case... ***Spoiler***
Date: November 03, 2008 10:33AM
Posted by: Stan (IP Logged)
Oh come on, did you hear what Vettel said? you of all people should know how big a differance tires make in F1. be a man and accpet the defeat
accept the defeat? I lost nothing. Massa lost and I even hate that guy Massa. That was unsportsmanlike behaviour. F1 drivers are supposed to fight for position no matter who is behind them and no matter what the situation is.
Date: November 03, 2008 10:33AM
Posted by: Stan (IP Logged)
Oh come on, did you hear what Vettel said? you of all people should know how big a differance tires make in F1. be a man and accpet the defeat
accept the defeat? I lost nothing. Massa lost and I even hate that guy Massa. That was unsportsmanlike behaviour. F1 drivers are supposed to fight for position no matter who is behind them and no matter what the situation is.
red 5 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Re: ***Spoiler*** Timo Glock the case...
> ***Spoiler***
> Date: November 03, 2008 10:33AM
> Posted by: Stan (IP Logged)
>
> Oh come on, did you hear what Vettel said? you of
> all people should know how big a differance tires
> make in F1. be a man and accpet the defeat
>
> accept the defeat? I lost nothing. Massa lost and
> I even hate that guy Massa. That was
> unsportsmanlike behaviour. F1 drivers are supposed
> to fight for position no matter who is behind them
> and no matter what the situation is.
Then stop posting bullsheet
-------------------------------------------------------
> Re: ***Spoiler*** Timo Glock the case...
> ***Spoiler***
> Date: November 03, 2008 10:33AM
> Posted by: Stan (IP Logged)
>
> Oh come on, did you hear what Vettel said? you of
> all people should know how big a differance tires
> make in F1. be a man and accpet the defeat
>
> accept the defeat? I lost nothing. Massa lost and
> I even hate that guy Massa. That was
> unsportsmanlike behaviour. F1 drivers are supposed
> to fight for position no matter who is behind them
> and no matter what the situation is.
Then stop posting bullsheet
I was hopping round the room with joy when Vettel passed Hamilton, and basically crying into a cushion when Hamilton passed Glock, but even I'm not stupid enough to think that Glock let Hamilton through.
Morbid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And people who use the internet are supposed to
> have social skills, but often.... ah nevermind...
Fell off my chair laughing at that one, made my day.
[www.mediafire.com] Some say you should click it, you know you want to. [www.gp4central.com] <----GP4 Central
-------------------------------------------------------
> And people who use the internet are supposed to
> have social skills, but often.... ah nevermind...
Fell off my chair laughing at that one, made my day.
[www.mediafire.com] Some say you should click it, you know you want to.
[www.gp4central.com] <----GP4 CentralRed 5, quite simply you're an idiot. You try driving a Formula One car with no traction control (or any sort of traction) in wet conditions on dry tyres that had already done 35 laps. He had absolutely no chance.
red 5 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Re: ***Spoiler*** Timo Glock the case...
> ***Spoiler***
> Date: November 03, 2008 10:33AM
> Posted by: Stan (IP Logged)
>
> Oh come on, did you hear what Vettel said? you of
> all people should know how big a differance tires
> make in F1. be a man and accpet the defeat
>
> accept the defeat? I lost nothing. Massa lost and
> I even hate that guy Massa. That was
> unsportsmanlike behaviour. F1 drivers are supposed
> to fight for position no matter who is behind them
> and no matter what the situation is.
What was unsportsman like behaviour was the Brazillian crowd, I seriously hope they consider leaving that country after what they did when Hamilton won, fair enough they wanted their man to win, but did we boo MS at silverstone when he beat Hamilton? No.
__________________________
Help keep our forums tidy.
Use the search function...
-------------------------------------------------------
> Re: ***Spoiler*** Timo Glock the case...
> ***Spoiler***
> Date: November 03, 2008 10:33AM
> Posted by: Stan (IP Logged)
>
> Oh come on, did you hear what Vettel said? you of
> all people should know how big a differance tires
> make in F1. be a man and accpet the defeat
>
> accept the defeat? I lost nothing. Massa lost and
> I even hate that guy Massa. That was
> unsportsmanlike behaviour. F1 drivers are supposed
> to fight for position no matter who is behind them
> and no matter what the situation is.
What was unsportsman like behaviour was the Brazillian crowd, I seriously hope they consider leaving that country after what they did when Hamilton won, fair enough they wanted their man to win, but did we boo MS at silverstone when he beat Hamilton? No.
__________________________
Help keep our forums tidy.
Use the search function...
Re: ***Spoiler*** Timo Glock the case... ***Spoiler***
Date: November 03, 2008 12:10PM
Posted by: Willb (IP Logged)
What was unsportsman like behaviour was the Brazillian crowd, I seriously hope they consider leaving that country after what they did when Hamilton won, fair enough they wanted their man to win, but did we boo MS at silverstone when he beat Hamilton? No.
check your facts mr. former MOD. MS never beat LH at silverstone. Infact he never beat him ever. You know why. Because MS retired before LH debuted.
PWNED!!!!
Date: November 03, 2008 12:10PM
Posted by: Willb (IP Logged)
What was unsportsman like behaviour was the Brazillian crowd, I seriously hope they consider leaving that country after what they did when Hamilton won, fair enough they wanted their man to win, but did we boo MS at silverstone when he beat Hamilton? No.
check your facts mr. former MOD. MS never beat LH at silverstone. Infact he never beat him ever. You know why. Because MS retired before LH debuted.
PWNED!!!!
No we didnt because lewis never raced MS 
But I totally understand your point
But I totally understand your point
lol, somone got owned :P
You can not lose 20 seconds per lap. You just can not.
No, you cant lose 20 secs - but look at Massa's 40 second slower lap than Heidfeld's lap (Massa on dries, Heidfeld on wets)
or Glocks 46 second quicker lap than Massa...
2013 - Nando must come through..
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/03/2008 12:26PM by casabonka.
No, you cant lose 20 secs - but look at Massa's 40 second slower lap than Heidfeld's lap (Massa on dries, Heidfeld on wets)
or Glocks 46 second quicker lap than Massa...
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/03/2008 12:26PM by casabonka.
Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.