Applying a weight penalty is a far, FAR better idea than a 10-place grid penalty. Still not ideal, but much better. Previously, teams such as Minardi, Jordan etc. were able to change engines without a massive penalty, and they yet were the ones who sought to reduce costs by using fewer engines.
I'm not keen on the CDG wing either, I think the alterations to bodywork and tyres - coupled with standard ECUs - will do enough to solve the problem without resorting to artificial means.
The one rule which looks ominous is this one:-
* Expensive new technologies which give a team an advantage and are subsequently adopted by other teams will be banned after one season
Purpose: To reduce costs. The aim is to allow a team that discovers a new technology to benefit from it, but prevent F1 as a whole then spending money on the same technology only to leave all the teams in the same relative positions as before.Erm, excuse me? There's a line to be drawn between creativity and pursuance of economy, and for me, this one lies way over the wrong side of the line.
Other than those 2 things, I'm pleased with the proposals, as a fan.
K*bots UK, specialist providers of 'fun science' Curriculum Enhancement days for Primary and Secondary schools in Britain.Please find us on [en.wikipedia.org] for more information.