look at the situation and facts for once!!Done. Now your turn - listen to the experts, watch Schumacher in the car. The reason Schumi is number one is because he's so bloody good and he's deserved that status, and the team realise that if Barrichello has a decent race, but Schumi is right behind, then it's more than likely that in the next race, and the rest of the season for that matter, Barrichello will have a slump in performance, whereas Michael won't. MS is more consistant, and faster.
if he had done the unsportmanly thing of making mclaren a one man team and made DC defer every race and give up his positions to allow mika to gain extra points, mika would have sewn the title up way before the end of the season.Look, you're clearly just saying things you haven't actually thought about. Why don't
you look at the facts?
2000Classifications: Schumacher/Hakkinen/Coulthard
1/-/-
1/-/-
1/2/3
3/2/1*
5/1/2
1/2/3
-/6/1
1/4/7
-/2/1*
-/1/2
-/2/3
2/1/3
2/1/4
1/2/-
1/-/5
1/2/3
1/4/2
*By my reckoning there are two races in which Coulthard finished higher than Hakkinen, and in which Schumacher did not win. I'm not including Monaco because a) Schumi would have won, and b) Hakkinen had problems anyway. At maximum, that is 8 extra points for Hakkinen had
he finished above Coulthard due to team orders. Schumi won the championship by 19 points. Do you see my point? McLaren didn't even have a chance to use team orders really, save in those two circumstances.
For the rest of the time, had you actually looked at the facts instead of telling everyone else to, you'd have noticed that Hakkinen finished second to a dominant Schumacher. The final four races saw some of the greatest Schumacher victories.
i suggest you check the stats of 2000 Don't sound quite so superior now do you?
HISTORIC BTCC VIDEOS