your arguments are so flimsy alex, your questioning the validity of a f1 driverCrikey LS, if you only knew how often you make a mockery of every damn thing that Schumacher says. You are constantly questioning the validity of
the best and most experienced driver in the field, I just wish you would realise that before posting comments like that.
not according to alex Schumacher is a demi god who can perform miraclesI can't believe this. One moment you accuse me of holding Schumi in such awe that I think he performs miracles, the next moment you're naive enought to believe that whatever St. Montoya says absolutely
must be true. Remarkable.
you are so adamant that MS is the bestDoes this really surprise you? The facts are laid out in front of you and quite often shoved into your face by me (for the sake of argument). 4 world championships. 3 of which won in an inferior car. 54 race wins. Some of the best GP performances ever.Tell me - and above all I'd be interested to hear your response to this - what do you think when you read comments by such people as Sir Stirling Moss, Sir Jackie Stewart, Murray Walker, Martin Brundle, Peter Windsor, Nigel Roebuck, Tony Jardine, Eddie Jordan, even Bernie Eccelestone, who say that there is no doubt that Michael Schumacher is head and shoulders above the rest of the field in terms of talent. And remember these guys are experts. What do you think when you read these,
if you read them? Every single driver of the year award was awarded to Schumacher in 2000 and 2001, and you don't get them for having a good car. Instead of treating me as though I'm in a minority and have a strange opinion, why don't you consider yourself as the one against the flow for once? Because you are.
your arguments are so flimsy alexWhat exactly do you mean by flimsy? I'd really like to know, just to make sure you're not saying it because you've run out of excuses at last and have to start condemining the structure of my argument rather than the content. If anyone has a flimsy argument, then it would more than liely be one of you anti-Schumists, seeing as you haven't really got much to go by have you?
It just amuses me that right after the season opener which Schumacher quite conclusively won, you, having made all these hopeful predictions that Montoya will infact beat him this year, immediately have to find every excuse possible for why it wasn't actually Michael Schumacher himself that won the GP. It was luck that won it for him as well, and the car, just like the other 53 no doubt. I've never heard you, nor ever will, congratulate Schumacher on a well earned victory that he thoroughly deserved - I think you are incapable of doing so. The first thing that struck me when I saw that comment...
geez how lucky can a guy be..was
bitterness. Pure bitterness, and it always is. You hate the guy, and I've no problem with that, however it leads you to condemn his talent which is unfair. I've never condemned Montoya's talent, because I don't think that is fair, and it's not right either. Montoya is very fast indeed, but just not as much as Schumacher. And part of that is down to experience. Montoya has proved himself a worthy rival to Schumacher - now he just needs to beat him to the WDC. However, in my opinion, DC has not proved himself a worthy rival to MS. Of course he has performed fantastically well on occasions, but it's the consistancy that counts, and Coulthard just hasn't hacked it, despite the fact that he thinks he thinks he has. Montoya hasn't had the proper chance to prove himself yet. That comes this season. And at Melbourne, he failed. He has 15 more races.
And thanks Mark for your supportive argument, I totally agree and appreciate it.
HISTORIC BTCC VIDEOS