belini gp4 to gp32k imola 1999 - 2005 released
Posted by belini
belini gp4 to gp32k imola 1999 - 2005 (gp32k only)
coming soon - barcelona 1999 - 2005
monaco 1999 - 2005
[www.belini.fsnet.co.uk]
Think it looks better than the GP4 version imo. Bought GP3 2k the other day jsut to use your tracks, and although the PO can get a bit high, it's certainly worth it.
Go Alesi Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Think it looks better than the GP4 version imo.
> Bought GP3 2k the other day jsut to use your
> tracks, and although the PO can get a bit high,
> it's certainly worth it.
>
>
>
> Win XP Home- P4 2.66Ghz- GF4Ti4800SE 41.04
> drivers- 512MBDDR Ram- Dx 9.0- SB Audigy with
> Creative 5.1 Speakers
glad you're enjoying the tracks
our systems are almost identical have you tried the 29.42 drivers, they
give a big improvement in po.
[www.belini.fsnet.co.uk]
-------------------------------------------------------
> Think it looks better than the GP4 version imo.
> Bought GP3 2k the other day jsut to use your
> tracks, and although the PO can get a bit high,
> it's certainly worth it.
>
>
>
> Win XP Home- P4 2.66Ghz- GF4Ti4800SE 41.04
> drivers- 512MBDDR Ram- Dx 9.0- SB Audigy with
> Creative 5.1 Speakers
glad you're enjoying the tracks
our systems are almost identical have you tried the 29.42 drivers, they
give a big improvement in po.
[www.belini.fsnet.co.uk]
always great Tracks, i like them all so much from you 
belini, it's impossible to find words to describe your gp4 convertions.
But you know, most of the players are still with GP3 because of system requirements.
Once you told me that your tracks eat CPU because of the small track sectors, not because of the hundreds of cmds.
I know that lots of these sectors are very the same on angle and track height.
So, is it really impossible to build the tracks with larger sectors? I understand that it will take away the visual effect of the constant changes in width, but it's something we could live with.
Actually your amazing tracks are useful just for a few people... It would be so great if more people could play it.
Also, Sakhir and Shangai are not as heavy as the GP4 convertions... So maybe there's something you can do for your fans
But you know, most of the players are still with GP3 because of system requirements.
Once you told me that your tracks eat CPU because of the small track sectors, not because of the hundreds of cmds.
I know that lots of these sectors are very the same on angle and track height.
So, is it really impossible to build the tracks with larger sectors? I understand that it will take away the visual effect of the constant changes in width, but it's something we could live with.
Actually your amazing tracks are useful just for a few people... It would be so great if more people could play it.
Also, Sakhir and Shangai are not as heavy as the GP4 convertions... So maybe there's something you can do for your fans
SuperSonic Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> belini, it's impossible to find words to describe
> your gp4 convertions.
>
> But you know, most of the players are still with
> GP3 because of system requirements.
>
> Once you told me that your tracks eat CPU because
> of the small track sectors, not because of the
> hundreds of cmds.
>
> I know that lots of these sectors are very the
> same on angle and track height.
>
> So, is it really impossible to build the tracks
> with larger sectors? I understand that it will
> take away the visual effect of the constant
> changes in width, but it's something we could live
> with.
>
> Actually your amazing tracks are useful just for a
> few people... It would be so great if more people
> could play it.
>
> Also, Sakhir and Shangai are not as heavy as the
> GP4 convertions... So maybe there's something you
> can do for your fans
I wish the PO was less too, but I don't think it's the small sectors but rather
the banking/width commands in conjunction with the view commands that
cause a lot of the problems. I've been working hard with view commands to
try and lower the PO, but a lot of the time it's the view commands that
cause/fix graphical glitches, it can be a nightmare to sort.
sakhir/shanghai are actually not that much better on my cpu (2.6 amd),
the 29.42 drivers give a massive improvement under xp, disabling realistic
weather also helps a lot, as would a faster cpu
the reason I started these conversions was because I loved the gp4 tracks
but quickly got bored (I've been doing this since f1gp), the only reason I
would go back from gp4 was if I could race the same tracks. the small
sectors and the banking/width commands that the gp4 tracks contain are
most of the reason why the gp4 tracks are so special, so it sort of defeats
the whole objective to simplify them.
[www.belini.fsnet.co.uk]
-------------------------------------------------------
> belini, it's impossible to find words to describe
> your gp4 convertions.
>
> But you know, most of the players are still with
> GP3 because of system requirements.
>
> Once you told me that your tracks eat CPU because
> of the small track sectors, not because of the
> hundreds of cmds.
>
> I know that lots of these sectors are very the
> same on angle and track height.
>
> So, is it really impossible to build the tracks
> with larger sectors? I understand that it will
> take away the visual effect of the constant
> changes in width, but it's something we could live
> with.
>
> Actually your amazing tracks are useful just for a
> few people... It would be so great if more people
> could play it.
>
> Also, Sakhir and Shangai are not as heavy as the
> GP4 convertions... So maybe there's something you
> can do for your fans
I wish the PO was less too, but I don't think it's the small sectors but rather
the banking/width commands in conjunction with the view commands that
cause a lot of the problems. I've been working hard with view commands to
try and lower the PO, but a lot of the time it's the view commands that
cause/fix graphical glitches, it can be a nightmare to sort.
sakhir/shanghai are actually not that much better on my cpu (2.6 amd),
the 29.42 drivers give a massive improvement under xp, disabling realistic
weather also helps a lot, as would a faster cpu
the reason I started these conversions was because I loved the gp4 tracks
but quickly got bored (I've been doing this since f1gp), the only reason I
would go back from gp4 was if I could race the same tracks. the small
sectors and the banking/width commands that the gp4 tracks contain are
most of the reason why the gp4 tracks are so special, so it sort of defeats
the whole objective to simplify them.
[www.belini.fsnet.co.uk]
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.