no, it's global warmingby LeeBeau - F1
i'm feeling reasonably happy and satisfied at the moment, don't know what you're on aboutby LeeBeau - F1
SchueyFan Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > Sky will almost certainly actively crack down on > illegal internet streams faster than the BBC have > done. they haven't so far..by LeeBeau - F1
loque Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > I hope the BBC lose all their viewers and I hope > the Sky coverage is shite. Then nobody will watch > and it'll serve the cxxt right. well this problem does not concern me directly but i seriously hope that the cover will be brilliant so that i can continue enjoying the free internet streamby LeeBeau - F1
bleh.. actively atheist - he's getting trolled big-timeby LeeBeau - Off-Topic
I think I've read a similar article for the last 5 years now. It would be a shame if it was cut though, I love it and it should be the 1st race of the season again (as it was this year ) "In 1996, taxpayers paid about $1.7 million and in 2000, the cost was $3.9 million." Ecclestone wins.by LeeBeau - F1
yes, ice cream is forbidden, especially enjoying it gp was alright i guess, alonso got ahead of both mclarens in points, horner gets paranoid - i guess the decision was somewhat rational but is he really THAT afraid of mclaren, they're miles behind ??by LeeBeau - F1
SchueyFan Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > crashing on the > way to the grid on Saturday indeed, that was a bad one. Not to put him down or anything, i know he's quick, but is there a certain reason why red bull picks ricciardo over e.g. vergne, who's shown some solid stuff this year (or someone from another series with red bull sponsorship)?by LeeBeau - F1
SchueyFan Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I think Dan's qualifying speed is > excellent, but I'm not so sure about his > racecraft, that's probably the reason why rb bought that spot for him, it will definitely be interesting to see how he'll manage but i don't think it would be that big of a deal from rb's point of viby LeeBeau - F1
ok soz u win i now think he's goodby LeeBeau - F1
kubica2 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > nearly won the championship. but he stuffed it in the wall. he'd been complaining the whole time even though he led the championship. i don't really hate anybody, he's had some really fantastic races where i've rooted for him (even this season) but imo he just doesn't deserve a seat in theby LeeBeau - F1
Guimengo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > @LeeBeau: > Senna only had 19 fastest laps in his career which > means they mean nothing. oh trust me i think he sucks and should not be in f1 but atleast he's got SOMEthing on vettel so he's not that bad.by LeeBeau - F1
DaveEllis Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Webber hasn't been as bad as we think really. idd, he's got 4 fastest laps against vettel's 0.by LeeBeau - F1
not to sound like a (gay)fanboy but i think it's fun having him around, he does unpredictable stuff and it's entertaining to watch and discuss . i'm pretty sure if there ever was a sportsman, who could allow himself to arse-about like this, then it's him. but, for the record, i'm not digging the idea of extending his contract, even if by some crazy miracle mercedes wouby LeeBeau - F1
the start will be important as always, hoping to see schumacher have a good one as he so often does and it will be interesting to see how much webber can limit his losses in the start. surely a sc or two . good for massa and ferrari but it doesn't really make much of a difference in terms of the championship imo - vettel still has it locked and going by what horner's saying it'sby LeeBeau - F1
idd, cos if it would work on that basis then shep34 himself should not complain. unless we pay big bucks here we only get the race on sunday and it's not even live . bild saying schumacher to extend contract for some reason i just don't see mercedes building a decent car in the near future, is he really that curious and hopeful?by LeeBeau - F1
danm Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Silverstone 2010... yeah, pretty serious politics, he won the race - that's messed up. any other examples?by LeeBeau - F1
danm Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > some serious No.1 politics like..? i think most f1 fans would like rosberg to have a decent ride, same here. räikkönen would also be fun to watch but it will probably be neither of them in that seat..by LeeBeau - F1
yeh, if they make it to bahrainby LeeBeau - F1
i'm sure there's a perfectly good explanation for thatby LeeBeau - F1
yes, i won't watch & it will be a great blow to bahrain, they'll be sorry for harrassing their peoples after they learn in october that a certain estonian guy didn't watch the f1 broadcast and they shall be ashamed of themselves. this might even call for military action by the whole region there but i just don't care - i will not watch - the most meaningful of statements.by LeeBeau - F1
marwood82 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > EC83 Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Playing the racism card because the stewards > > won't turn a blind eye to his idiotic driving? > > Piss off. > > > so i take it you believe he was being serious? well if you were to i.e callby LeeBeau - F1
an epic race aside from the end. button's not my favourite driver but i was madly rooting for him - he was on the verge of a LEGENDARY race only to be screwed over by the strategy (did they really think there wasn't going to be a SC), such a shame they were allowed to change tyres before the restart. i'd just begun to like hamilton based on his performances this season but manby LeeBeau - F1
Nickv Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > > **SPOILERS BELOW** > > > > > Todays battle between Vettel and Hamilton could > only go on because Hamilton could keep up thanks > to the DRS, without the DRS, Vettel would've > driven away easily. > I doubt he would've gone away that easily considering howby LeeBeau - F1
i'm generally on schumacher's side but he really could've avoided that accident, he should've anticipated that petrov clearly had no control due to braking so late (kudos to the balls) and at that point one would've expected schumacher's experience to step up and avoid a race-ruining incident..by LeeBeau - F1
Vader Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > And you would be surprised not at all, it's clear that to turn people's beliefs into institutions you need brains not faith in god(s) or whatnot. I wasn't suggesting that the ones bringing that excuse are religious themselves and are not aiming for something absolutely different. Again, don't getby LeeBeau - Off-Topic
completely agree with your point of view but i'd like to add that i obviously don't see there being any excuse for killing anyone (utopia) but we could get moar philosophical but that would just be so off-topic so i'll just throw out an idea that irrationality destroys itself and in some cases everything that's around it edit: also what i meant was that religion is broughby LeeBeau - Off-Topic
Frantic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > curious thing > Bin Laden´s family was a sponsor of Williams in > 1979-80 i find more curious that bin laden family had ties with bush sr. & jr. (and hussein aswell) in the petroleum industry that broke some time before 9/11 happened. i don't really care if he lives or not, they'll still have rby LeeBeau - Off-Topic