xSilvermanx Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> MDBSnake schrieb:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Macca25 Schreef:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > The penalties are a bit harsh when we haven't
> > had
> > > any on track action during this activity
> > period!!!
> >
> > I do not agree with that, the rules have been
> > there for a long period of time. They should be
> > well known by all who are involved in the
> league,
> > and respected. It's everyone's own
> responsibility
> > to uphold these rules which are democratically
> > created by us all. Even when there is no real
> 'on
> > track' action. There is enough around to make a
> > comment about to state your activity.
>
> Totally agree with this. Just would like to throw
> in the idea of making the system a bit more
> liberal. At the moment a perf penalty of 20 points
> for the first inactivity means quite a big
> drawback as 20 points in the tight GPGSL-field
> means quite a few places dropped
> performance-wise.
> This being the first penalty seems a bit harsh for
> me. Rules should be standing as is (look at me, I
> see a activity check and directly post some
> generic message so I don't have to bother anymore)
> but maybe replace that first penalty with a
> warning or a 10 points-reduction. I think one time
> inactivity could happen. Of course the second
> penalty should have increased drawbacks, I'd say
> let the 2 races-demotion stand as is and up the
> perf-reduction to a total of 30 points.
In my experience the difference between 10 perf points and 20 is almost non-existence in practice.
The system works fine as it is in my opinion.
Interested in managing an F1 team? Sign up for the Grandprixgames F1 Manager game here