The Official 2009 Singapore Grand Prix Thread ***SPOILERS***

Posted by EC83 
I think Sutil thought he was playing GP4 with "indestructible" turned on.

[Website]
Heidfeld's car came out of that crash with the rear wheel sticking up like Senna's was at Estoril in 1989. A long time since I've seen an F1 car damaged in quite that way.

Sutil went from being possibly the driver of the weekend at Monza to being a total n00b in this race.



EC83 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This year's Championship battle is proving to be a
> total anticlimax after the last few ones TBH, it's
> the least exciting one at least since 2005.


Oh yeah, absolutely. And its not even close. I guess its great for some people to have all these different winners, to claim F1 isn't one sided. But to me thats utterly boring. These meaningless wins do nothing for me.

What I crave is what we were spoiled with the last couple years. Ferrari vs. McLaren. Two teams going head to head, session after session ,race after race, fighting tooth & nail. To me, thats what makes F1. Following an intense rivalry all the way through the season.



Webbo's penalty a difficult one.

A shame for Nico but it happens, and it was his mistake. Still, whether he finished or not it was once again perfect represenation of how he needs a better car!! Driver of the day IMO.

tbh I didnt know Glock was 2nd till he crossed the line! kinda came from nowhere! Good result but why cant he do this every race? he's too inconsistant!

Brawn did not have the pace to win today!! Button did a pretty good job, once again doing it when it matters.

it's a shame to hear the same old, Button not worthy shite. It was always, "he's not good enough", "when he wins ill change my mind blahblah" and yet now people have the very nerve to try and put down this championship.

Alot of people bum Vettel. I do, I think hes great, BUT he has never got the job done when it matters, he has never once showed he's aggressive and can overtake when he needs too and he's often made his races alot harder for himself by bad starts or simply not overtaking! Take Rubens at Bahrain on Piquet. Rubens chucked the car inside from miles back! People are saying Button is going to be the worst champion for a long time... why?

He's won the most races, got most poles, most points, most consistant, least mistakes, got the job done when it matters, overtaken when he's had to. A few bad races but who doesnt have those?

In the last few seasons Lewis made plenty of mistakes, Massa made mistakes, Kimi is inconsistant... I ask, what have they done to earn the right of being the 'elite' and being Godlike amungst F1 fans whereas divers like Button can only dream of being as good as they are? I see people making excuses after excuses to try and put him down another notch and its getting a bit old now.

This isnt aimed at anyone, its an observation!!! I havent mentioned Alonso in those list because he simply is Godlike :p!

edit - Also on this, Button's pace on very heavy fuel before the first stop was fantastic. He was keeping up and getting quicker than a lighter Kova. Had the saftey car not come out Button would have been a better posistion IMO. The extra fuel he had could have eventually see him in front of Vettel and maybe ahead of Alonso.

Karen - Meaningless wins? How so? Also Mclaren v's Ferrari is F1??

Some may say Alfa v's Merecedes and Ferrari, otherwise will say Lotus v's Tyrrell, others even many say Williams v's Mclaren. Catch my drift?

btw, if F1 is Mclaren v's Ferrari, what was the sport between 1979 and 2000?!






"Trulli was slowing down like he wanted to have a picnic" LOL



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/28/2009 02:29AM by chet.
I really hate against the fia and whiteny's management in the way they treat their drivers. They are too strict nowadays and so over reacting about a simple incident. like webber gone wide and got drive through penalty? wtf... i hope whitney got less to live in this planet earth.


micky-cannonball Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I hate really those FIA & Whitney's management!.
>
> Rosberg lossing the rear end on whiteline just a
> bit.. then a drive through penalty for thats
> unfair though! he did not gain any time their,
> infact he lost a bit of time their!

Schumacher got 2 drive trhoughs in a row in Magny Cours 2002 by barely touching that white line, barely... trust me, Rosberg deserves it.. what if someone was driving side by side "their"???

> and webber overtaking alonso on 4 wheels abit
> outside (Heavy penalty i think) still unfair! F1
> Now are to strict with those FIA....

people compare Kimi with Webber spa is a bit unfair, in Spa drivers where told that they could use the run off in the 1st lap only in order to avoid an accident, and Kimi's car lost traction and everything, he only came out ahead because of KERS, but anyways this is already been discussed, but here Webber should've braked earlier and would've gone past an out of shape Alonso, easy... beisdes the next courner was in Webber's side, so he did had an advantage there

chet Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
< edit - Also on this, Button's pace on very heavy
> fuel before the first stop was fantastic. He was
> keeping up and getting quicker than a lighter
> Kova. Had the saftey car not come out Button would
> have been a better posistion IMO. The extra fuel
> he had could have eventually see him in front of
> Vettel and maybe ahead of Alonso.

i got impressed by that too, not because he was keeping up with Kovalainen, because we all know he's useless, but because he was not loosing as much to Barrichello... smae scenario as Spain pretty much..

> Karen - Meaningless wins? How so? Also Mclaren v's
> Ferrari is F1??
>
> Some may say Alfa v's Merecedes and Ferrari,
> otherwise will say Lotus v's Tyrrell, others even
> many say Williams v's Mclaren. Catch my drift?
>
> btw, if F1 is Mclaren v's Ferrari, what was the
> sport between 1979 and 2000?!

people don't like change, next year if Mclaren and Ferrari continue to win then it will be boring again for many. this year's been amazing, who would've tought that Force India could win a race at the start of the season?, who would've tought that Jenson and Rubens would be fighting for the championship after Honda announced they where leaving F1?

if Jenson doesn't deserve the championship then who does? Lewis?, Kimi? Barrichello has made far more mistakes than him, bad starts, bad qualys, bad races, and same for Vettel and Webber
it doesn't matter what Vettel promisses in the future, if he can't win this championship then Jenson can.. otherwise why bother racing?, why just not giving the championship to whoever "deserves it"?
Karan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Oh yeah, absolutely. And its not even close. I
> guess its great for some people to have all these
> different winners, to claim F1 isn't one sided.
> But to me thats utterly boring. These meaningless
> wins do nothing for me.

See, from a Ferrari/McLaren fanboy, that's rather hollow. If it came from a neutral, then fair enough, but I just think the neutrals are loving it. I know I am!

I'm quite nervous that Ferrari and McLaren might have it go their own way for most of 2010. I'd hate to see those teams who have made the best cars suddenly fall backwards as the 'big' teams stop making a mess. I don't want F1 to turn into something like a football league, where the same top teams (the so called 'big 4' in England and Celtic and Ranger in Scotland for example) are the only ones challenging for the title year after year, and other teams very rarely getting in among them.

I'm loving F1 at the moment, with an entire grid separated by 1.5 seconds or something, and 6 genuine different winners, all of who could fail to make it into Q2 with relative ease the following race.

It's like F1 back in the 60s, 70s and early-mid 80s.
Button has won 6 races this year. Unusually, they all managed to come at the start of the season. But if he had won the fist one, then had a bad race, then won the next one, etc. (i.e. all his wins were spread out over a whole season) then people's viewing of things would be different. It's rubbish saying that he doesn't deserve the title because he hasn't achieved enough. Look at his points total! If he wins this year, that total's going to be very similar, if not better, to those achieved in '03, '05, '06, '07 and '08.

The problem with the younger generation is that they've grown up in the Schumaher era, when Championships were won decisively by one of the best drivers the World has ever seen. For many years before that, and in the current F1 climate, nobody has a perfect, dominant season. This Championship battle is no different from countless others which have gone before it, and Jenson has certainly done no better or worse than most of the recent World Champions over a whole season.



K*bots UK, specialist providers of 'fun science' Curriculum Enhancement days for Primary and Secondary schools in Britain.

Please find us on [en.wikipedia.org] for more information.
BUT he has never got the job done when it matters

Shanghai? Might be being a bit harsh on Vettel. He is still relatively new to this. Schumacher wasn't getting the job done in the early days either. He was far more erratic than Vettel is. But he turned into a multiple world champion. Vettel is out there doing a better job than almost all of the rest of the grid. Just because he isn't winning championships just yet doesn't really say much.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
theRacingLine.net
SportsCarArchives.com
DaveEllis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That said, he was poor. Vettel got a penalty and
> damaged his car, and was still ahead of Webber
> before his accident. That shouldn't have been.

I agree that he didn't drive very well in the race (allowing a big gap to form between him and Barrichello when the SC came out, allowing Jenson and Kovalainen to come out between them was particularly poor and showed a lack of awareness), but i think the fact that Webber was stuck behind Alonso was the main reason for him being that far back, nothing to do with his pace. Sure he was slower than Vettel at the start of the race anyway, but not slow enough to be that far back.





X (@ed24f1)
Locke Cole Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If he wins this year, that
> total's going to be very similar, if not better,
> to those achieved in '03, '05, '06, '07 and '08.

I disagree. He might get close to 03 and 08. Maybe, 07, if he wins the last 3 races of the season (And that's a big if, since the dude hasn't won a race for a little while). But in 2005 and 2006 Alonso had 133 and 134 points respectively. Kinda hard for Button to get there with 3 races to go...although, granted the 2005 season had 19 races, and the 2006 season had 18 I think.
First at all, Button deserves the title. He won when he had the best car, fair enough! The fact that he is not the best driver of the grid doesn't mean he does not deserve the title. I don't think that many people is going to say that.

What it is true, is that could be a title like MotoGP 2006 Hayden title, after this season, Button could end nowhere again next year and never come back. But he took the chance, good for him.

Vettel is too inconsistent a season long. Yes, he has been good when he had the best car, but he doesn't seems to be there when the car is not the best one...he disappointed me a little bit during the second half of the season, but he has been capable of beating Webber (they are quite tight) which is quite an achievement considering Webber's career vs his team-mates. Vettel is definitely good.
He went on to win six of the first seven races of the season (2009), equalling a record achieved by only two other drivers, Michael Schumacher and Jim Clark.

About vettel, I think he(STR),schumacher(Jordan) and Senna(Lotus) are the only guy i think who have performed well beyond expections driving for low budget team. Well soon alot of talented driver outheir will lineup to this guys:) anyway!






Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 09/28/2009 03:46PM by micky-cannonball.
Ali Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What it is true, is that could be a title like
> MotoGP 2006 Hayden title, after this season,
> Button could end nowhere again next year and never
> come back. But he took the chance, good for him.

I think that is very highly likely. We have seen from the 2nd half of this year that McLaren and Ferrari are doing as good or better a job than Brawn and Red Bull with their 2009 cars. With 2010 cars and probably the four best drivers of the year, it is very hard to see anything but a Ferrari vs. McLaren battle for the championship next year. Red Bull and Brawn could get a win or two, but not enough to fight for the championship i think.





X (@ed24f1)
Vettel still needs to show he can race and not just drive fast. This year I dont think he has over taken one car on track? He has either finished where he started or gone backwards. Its not all his fault though thanks to the KERS cars.

Button has done some good moves this year to make up places lost at the start, but Vettel does not.

Button does deserve the championship due to the start of the year, and is making the most of his 1st shot at the title. Will he get another one who knows. Other drivers have had the chance to beat Button this year but have not taken the chances when they were presented to them.

Under Bernies system Button would now be champ.
micky-cannonball Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> About vettel, I think he(STR),schumacher(Jordan)
> and Senna(Lotus) are the only guy i think who have
> performed well beyond expections driving for low
> budget team. Well soon alot of talented driver
> outheir will lineup to this guys:) anyway!

It's harder now to drive 'above expectations' now than it was in the 90s and earlier.

Of recent drivers, I'd add Alonso, Barrichello and especially Frentzen to the list above.

It's pretty much the opposite of Diniz, who only ever came alive when he got into a strong car - he was crap in the Forti.

Even back in the 60s and 70s drivers didn't outperform their cars too much - if they were in a lower car than they would be later in their career they tended to give that car some respect. Stewart at BRM is a good example. He went on to dominate at Matra, March and Tyrell, but took a bit of time to get going at BRM. I had a few good races (leading at Spa one year ('67 I think) before retiring as I recall) but overall didn't overly show the potential he realised in his later years.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/28/2009 03:58PM by gav.
I would also say Lewis has out performed his car this year, yes there have been errors due to pushing hard etc. But the gap between him and Kovy is fairly large and I dont think Kovy is that bad tbh.
marcl Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I would also say Lewis has out performed his car
> this year, yes there have been errors due to
> pushing hard etc. But the gap between him and
> Kovy is fairly large and I dont think Kovy is that
> bad tbh.

When the McLaren was among the worst cars, Lewis didn't even make it into the Q2 3 races straigh...Kovy did. I wouldn't say Lewis showed anything special when the McLaren was bad. When the McLaren improved, Lewis started to improve too and the gap versus Kovalainen increased considerably.
Race pace though :) Over one lap Kovy is fantastic shown by his lap at Monza.

I still think Lewis drove well at the start of the year, pushing as hard as he could yes sometimes to hard like in China but at least he was trying.

I dunno its just my view on it.
I'd agree [edit: with Ali] to an extent. He only came alive at Monaco when the car was clearly better, or he made it better. Prior to that he looked very, very lacking, and again when the faster circuits came along and the McLaren was poor. Heikki generally had the equal of him, whereas now he's now miles off of course.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/28/2009 04:54PM by gav.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Maintainer: mortal, stephan | Design: stephan, Lo2k | Moderatoren: mortal, TomMK, Noog, stephan | Downloads: Lo2k | Supported by: Atlassian Experts Berlin | Forum Rules | Policy