McLaren MP4/21 Pics **WARNING 56K**

Posted by madotter 
Re: McLaren MP4/21 Pics **WARNING 56K**
Date: January 24, 2006 09:02PM
Posted by: marcl
not the new car

Re: McLaren MP4/21 Pics **WARNING 56K**
Date: January 24, 2006 10:20PM
Posted by: calimbo
And it's not using the new reg (2005) reg

Re: McLaren MP4/21 Pics **WARNING 56K**
Date: January 24, 2006 10:22PM
Posted by: vesuvius
yes Ferrari was using F2004 wich should be over 2 seconds faster than anyone else so there is nothing to worry about :)
Re: McLaren MP4/21 Pics **WARNING 56K**
Date: January 24, 2006 11:04PM
Posted by: Muks_C
F2004M that they started last season with, with a V8 engine.




RIP Jules, never to be forgotten. #KeepFightingMichael
Re: McLaren MP4/21 Pics **WARNING 56K**
Date: January 24, 2006 11:15PM
Posted by: vesuvius
Muks_C Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> F2004M that they started last season with, with a
> V8 engine.
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------------------------------
> -------
>
>
>
> James Blunt is RUBBISH!
> Show your appreciation for him HERE
>
> Chris Martin wet his bed. It was all yellow!


no not really if it would have been F2004M it would have had front wing that was made for 2005 regulations but it didn't it had the front wing that was made for 2004 regulations .
Re: McLaren MP4/21 Pics **WARNING 56K**
Date: January 24, 2006 11:24PM
Posted by: marcl
yes must say its a worry they are that much faster
Re: McLaren MP4/21 Pics **WARNING 56K**
Date: January 24, 2006 11:36PM
Posted by: vesuvius
marcl Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> yes must say its a worry they are that much faster


why ? I'm not because cars that was made for 2004 regulations shoulde be over 2 seconds faster :)
Re: McLaren MP4/21 Pics **WARNING 56K**
Date: January 24, 2006 11:37PM
Posted by: calimbo
Yeah, and in pics, you see the rear endplates, aren't as big as the new regs endplates

Re: McLaren MP4/21 Pics **WARNING 56K**
Date: January 24, 2006 11:46PM
Posted by: Muks_C
marcl Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> times from today
>
> . M. Gene - Ferrari F2004M V8 - 1:16.583 (+ 0.000
> ) - 88 laps
> 2 . J. Villeneuve - BMW Sauber F1.06 - 1:17.633 (+
> 1.050 ) - 92 laps
> 3 . J. P. Montoya - McLaren Mercedes MP4-21 -
> 1:17.639 (+ 1.056 ) - 87 laps
> 4 . G. Paffett - McLaren Mercedes MP4-20B V10 -
> 1:17.798 (+ 1.215 ) - 55 laps
> 5 . N. Heidfeld - BMW Sauber - 1:18.393 (+ 1.810 )
> - 23 laps
> 6 . R. Doornbos - Red Bull Ferrari RB2 - 1:19.104
> (+ 2.521 ) - 61 laps.
>
> if i were rbr i would be worried now

i'm only saying its the F2004M because thats what it says in Marcs post.





RIP Jules, never to be forgotten. #KeepFightingMichael
Re: McLaren MP4/21 Pics **WARNING 56K**
Date: January 25, 2006 07:26AM
Posted by: marcl
the f2004 is set to 2006 regs with a v8, and at the start of 2005 the f2004 was not on the pace of the other cars now its faster thats y i am worried.

the new ferrari looks more like the f2004 than the f2005
Re: McLaren MP4/21 Pics **WARNING 56K**
Date: January 25, 2006 01:22PM
Posted by: vesuvius
marcl Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> the f2004 is set to 2006 regs with a v8, and at
> the start of 2005 the f2004 was not on the pace of
> the other cars now its faster thats y i am
> worried.
>
> the new ferrari looks more like the f2004 than the
> f2005


not true only the engine is V8 but the aerodynamics are still 2004 regulations so no need to be worried. and 2004 cars should be over 2 seconds faster than 2005 cars and 2006 cars.
Re: McLaren MP4/21 Pics **WARNING 56K**
Date: January 25, 2006 06:15PM
Posted by: IWE
well.. Also all wings and other stuff was changed to 2005/2006 specs.. So not any reason why it would be any faster that 2005 cars! :S ;)

Kimi, so, Massa Fernando Sebastian is faster than you. Can you confirm you understood that message?
Re: McLaren MP4/21 Pics **WARNING 56K**
Date: January 25, 2006 06:26PM
Posted by: marcl
mclaren dont look to good everyone else is in the 1:16 they are in the 1:17's even on their 1st day Honda were faster than them and the toyota was.

Maybe its true about the engine power
Re: McLaren MP4/21 Pics **WARNING 56K**
Date: January 25, 2006 06:37PM
Posted by: anze89
any pictures of the gene ferrari?

this is a picture of ferrari F2004 with which MS tested about a month ago and it's made for 2005/2006 rules (look at the rear wing)








Re: McLaren MP4/21 Pics **WARNING 56K**
Date: January 25, 2006 06:41PM
Posted by: marcl
the ferrari is set to 2005/06 rules as i said that is the speed of the car. It has the 2006 engine and gear box.
Re: McLaren MP4/21 Pics **WARNING 56K**
Date: January 25, 2006 07:14PM
Posted by: watercolours
mclarens have returned to midgrid. i'm gonna cry out loud :((((((
Re: McLaren MP4/21 Pics **WARNING 56K**
Date: January 25, 2006 07:15PM
Posted by: Muks_C
just to remind you, TESTING TIMES MEAN NOTHING




RIP Jules, never to be forgotten. #KeepFightingMichael
Re: McLaren MP4/21 Pics **WARNING 56K**
Date: January 25, 2006 07:20PM
Posted by: chet
lol.






"Trulli was slowing down like he wanted to have a picnic" LOL
Re: McLaren MP4/21 Pics **WARNING 56K**
Date: January 25, 2006 07:20PM
Posted by: calimbo
Here's Massa driving a F2004 Not M:



That's from today. As you can see, the rear endplates are 2004


And this one is from yesterday, Gene driving a F2004 with the wing for 2004.

They aren't using a F2004M, with 2004 reg, not 05/06

Re: McLaren MP4/21 Pics **WARNING 56K**
Date: January 25, 2006 07:33PM
Posted by: Sauber89
the real test is 2morro i think schumacher's in the 248 for the first time against others if thats miles ahead we're in for annother 2004

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Maintainer: mortal, stephan | Design: stephan, Lo2k | Moderatoren: mortal, TomMK, Noog, stephan | Downloads: Lo2k | Supported by: Atlassian Experts Berlin | Forum Rules | Policy