I'm just amazed at seeing people siding with McLaren on that one. Especially since it is proven they had the documents, using them or not should have nothing to do with it. And well, why would they have them if they did not plan on using them in the first place?
So here are a few examples..
Someone gets caught with child porn, he tells the judge he had it but never watched it. I guess he obviously is innocent.
Michael Vick... has anyone seen him make two dogs fight? I sure did not, he probably is innocent. I don't care if he had dogs in his gouse, dog blood in his house, cages and whatever. Dude was never caught using them, sorry try again.
You're in class, final exam, you get up and start looking on everyone else's exams then finish your own. You tell the teacher you just looked for the fun of it but did not intend to cheat and did not use any of the answers you saw. I'm sure he'll gladly let you finish your exam in peace.
"Tour de France"... some of them get caught with roids in their bags, but since the piss and blood tests don't show it, I guess it means they obviously do not cheat. Wasnt Rasmussen excluded for NOTHING? The guy didnt do anythign wrong, besides missing a few tests here and there, he was never tested positive. Dude get back in it, the Yellow @#$%& is yours.
So, if you side with McLaren knowing they did have the documents, I guess you support psychos, michael vick, cheaters and steroid abusers too? Double standars much?
Thanks.