Erm, excuse me, but this years Minardi is bad because they don't have all the crap that the other teams have, and by your logic, I might add, have earned. This, you have what your have deserved leads to some stupid conclusions. For instance, since Toyota have the biggest outfit, they must really have a lot of results in F1 to boast about, since they have "earned" so much.
I saw an interview with Kiesa, were he explained (downforce of the minardi vs. arrows car) that their car had never even seen a windtunnel. They just have a designer that looks at the other car of the teams and spends some months sketching a overall design. There is about 90% chance that they get it pretty right. However, they don't know before the car hits the track, where they can begin to correct errors. And this year, that happenend on Avon F3000 tyres, because Bridgestone didn't "feel" like living up to the obligations that have according to the concorde agreement. Fat chance they had of making that car a rock and a roller before the season commenced...
At Monza, eight of the 20 competing drivers either started their F1 careers at Minardi or currently drive for Minardi. This team actively builds this sport, to the benefit of us, the viewers and certainly the drivers and other teams. Perhaps not they do not shroud F1 in legend like Ferrari, but Minardi certainly do a hell of a lot more for F1 than most other teams do.
You have whta you earn... Yeah right!
It's only after we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything.