Show your Renders v3.0
Posted by Jorpaes
another beauty is coming. fantastic job as usual my friend 
Excalibur Scritto:
-------------------------------------------------------
> [i.imgur.com]
I believe that even Codemasters will not give us a better model than this, great Excalibur!
-------------------------------------------------------
> [i.imgur.com]
I believe that even Codemasters will not give us a better model than this, great Excalibur!
Thank you guys! 
@MSchumi24: Honestly, the car is far to be perfect. It is between the beta and v.1. I tried to optimize it for GP4 the more I can but by lack of time, it will be released like this. I just hope that people will enjoy it in game
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
@MSchumi24: Honestly, the car is far to be perfect. It is between the beta and v.1. I tried to optimize it for GP4 the more I can but by lack of time, it will be released like this. I just hope that people will enjoy it in game
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
@Ruben, my pc spec are:
Motherboard: MSI X99A Raider
CPU: Intel Core I7 5820K 3,30Ghz
Ram: 16Go
GPU: Zotac Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 TI
But I would say that a lower config could do the same. It is mainly about the software used: Keyshot 8 (easy to handle and powerful)
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Motherboard: MSI X99A Raider
CPU: Intel Core I7 5820K 3,30Ghz
Ram: 16Go
GPU: Zotac Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 TI
But I would say that a lower config could do the same. It is mainly about the software used: Keyshot 8 (easy to handle and powerful)
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
... you can run faster than me, you can manage the car better than me, you can do whatever you want anyway I want you to always give me the road in front of my presence
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/09/2019 11:23PM by Lacrowe.
Thank you for thinking with me, much appreciated.
I was thinking about this ones; NUC8i5BEH and NUC8i7BEH2
My Grand Prix 4 Files
I'm a total dick. How many people can say that?
I was thinking about this ones; NUC8i5BEH and NUC8i7BEH2
Well, if it's just these two for the moment, it's a clear recommendation for the i7 version, simply because only the i7, as far as I'm aware of, supports hyper threading (virtual doubling of available cores). Since both of these Nucs don't have that high a clock frequency, the hyper threading will definitely have a big impact since your rendering program can use 8 instead of just 4 threads. Rendering is one of the prime areas where hyper threading gives you a real benefit of this technology.
The other, general, question is what you're really aiming for with the NUC. Do you want to render high-resolution, real-life like renders with it? Then, honestly, you'll have to plan for a lot of waiting time with just 2,7 GHz base frequency (although the 4,5 GHz Turbo speed aren't that bad, but I don't know how long a NUC can keep that speed before it's overheating).
If you just want to do an occasional render with Blender or Keyshot, the i7 NUC is definitely more than enough. And if it's really just a couple of renders a week, it might even be enough to go with the i5, save a good deal of money and just keep it running while you do other things. I went back to an i5 with my last computer upgrade (many years ago) since I wasn't rendering that much anymore and wanted a better game performance and less energy consumpter rather than the i7 hyper threading. But it really depends on what the machine is mainly used for.
The only thing I cannot answer is how the onboard graphics will interfere in the process. The GPU is NOT needed for the actual rendering process, but it is needed to display your changes while setting up scenes. So depending on which program(s) you use and whether or not they have inbuilt preview options, you might run into a bottleneck at this end. But again it depends whether or not you're planing to regularly build/adapt new scenes. However, even in this case it should be possible to add an external GPU to the NUC in case you need that extra graphical power.
GPGSL : Team Owner of 'Maverick Track Performance' (MTP)
The other, general, question is what you're really aiming for with the NUC. Do you want to render high-resolution, real-life like renders with it? Then, honestly, you'll have to plan for a lot of waiting time with just 2,7 GHz base frequency (although the 4,5 GHz Turbo speed aren't that bad, but I don't know how long a NUC can keep that speed before it's overheating).
If you just want to do an occasional render with Blender or Keyshot, the i7 NUC is definitely more than enough. And if it's really just a couple of renders a week, it might even be enough to go with the i5, save a good deal of money and just keep it running while you do other things. I went back to an i5 with my last computer upgrade (many years ago) since I wasn't rendering that much anymore and wanted a better game performance and less energy consumpter rather than the i7 hyper threading. But it really depends on what the machine is mainly used for.
The only thing I cannot answer is how the onboard graphics will interfere in the process. The GPU is NOT needed for the actual rendering process, but it is needed to display your changes while setting up scenes. So depending on which program(s) you use and whether or not they have inbuilt preview options, you might run into a bottleneck at this end. But again it depends whether or not you're planing to regularly build/adapt new scenes. However, even in this case it should be possible to add an external GPU to the NUC in case you need that extra graphical power.
GPGSL : Team Owner of 'Maverick Track Performance' (MTP)
The great benefit of the Ryzen 5 is that its integrated GPU is way ahead of the integrated Intel GPUs, so if you're aiming for something integrated, you're probably better off with the Ryzen. As for motherboards, I can recommend Asus. Since you'll probably need an ITX mainboard in such a small case, the most logic choice to go would be Asus' ROG STRIX B450-i Gaming (or the respective B350-i Gaming). They seem to be quite equal, price-wise, by now, so going with the newer 450 would be logical, unless you find the 350 for a bargain somewhere.
The more general question is if it's wise to go with such a small case for rendering purposes. Rendering typically maxes out the CPU and as such causes a lot of heat. I don't have any personal experience how well that goes with such small cases, so many somebody else can give their 2 cents. I'm concerned, however, that you might lose CPU power in longer renders because the CPU throttles down due to overheating.
GPGSL : Team Owner of 'Maverick Track Performance' (MTP)
The more general question is if it's wise to go with such a small case for rendering purposes. Rendering typically maxes out the CPU and as such causes a lot of heat. I don't have any personal experience how well that goes with such small cases, so many somebody else can give their 2 cents. I'm concerned, however, that you might lose CPU power in longer renders because the CPU throttles down due to overheating.
GPGSL : Team Owner of 'Maverick Track Performance' (MTP)
Scuderia Ferrari SF90 - Barcelona GP version
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Salut Denny
Isn't it strawberry red ?
.Eric .. it's called Lovable bright red from the favorite color of my lipstick
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.